This paper breaks new ground by looking at the role played by merchant empires, such as the Dutch East India Company (VOC), in shaping European interactions with the non-Western world. It offers a critique of the English School’s state-centric narrative of the expansion of international society by looking to how the VOC and its expansion in Asia influenced developments within Europe. As a non-state actor, the VOC developed networks of trade and power, which were intertwined with the Dutch struggle against Iberian hegemony. As this paper shows, the development of international law, sovereign equality and European international society needs to be understood as being constituted through these colonial encounters. Looking to the VOC as a merchant empire presents a more nuanced approach to the expansion narrative that recognises that states, empires and early modern companies developed in a co-evolutionary manner. This critical approach calls for the recognition of international society as an ongoing process formed by the contestation of hybrid cultures.
AbernethyDB (2000) The Dynamics of Global Dominance: European Overseas Empires, 1415–1980. London: Yale University Press.
2.
AcemogluDJohnsonSRobinsonJ (2005) The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change and economic growth. The American Economic Review95(3): 546–579.
3.
AcharyaA (2016) Advancing global IR: challenges, contentions and contributions. International Studies Review18(1): 4–15.
4.
AndersonC (2019) The old indies at the French court: John Maurit’s gift to Louis XIV. Early Modern Low Countries3(1): 32–59.
5.
AndradeT (2005) The company’s Chinese Pirates: how the Dutch East India company tried to lead a coalition of pirates to war against China 1621–2. Journal of World History15(4): 415–444.
6.
AndradeT (2006) The rise and fall of Dutch Taiwan 1624–1662. Journal of World History17(4): 429–450.
7.
AnievasANisanciogluK (2015) How the West Came to Rule: The Geopolitical Origins of Capitalism. London: Pluto Press.
8.
ArmitageD (2004) Hugo Grotius, The Free Sea. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
9.
AshworthLM (2009) Interdisciplinary and international relations. European Political Science8(1): 16–25.
10.
BaenaLM (2007) Negotiating sovereignty: the peace treaty of Münster 1648. History of Political Thought28(4): 617–641.
11.
BarkawiT (2010) Empire and order in international relations and security studies. In: RobertADRenéeMB (eds) The International Studies Encyclopedia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
BarretoJM (2017) Cerberus: rethinking Grotius and the Westphalian System. In: KoskenniemiRFonseca (eds) International Law and Empire: Historical Explorations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 149–175.
13.
BentonL (2005) Legal spaces of empire: piracy and the origins of ocean revolution. Comparative Studies in Society and History47(4): 700–724.
14.
BentonL (2009) A Search for Sovereignty: Law and Geography in European Empires 1400–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15.
BentonL (2018) Made in Empire: finding the history of International Law in Imperial Locations. Leiden Journal of International Law31(3): 473–478.
16.
BentonLClulowA (2017) Empires and protection: making interpolity law in the early modern world. Journal of Global History12(1): 74–92.
17.
BirkenholzF (2017) Merchant Kings and Lords of the World in Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World 1410-1800. In: SowerbyTHenningsJ (eds) Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World c.1410-1800. London: Routledge, 219–236.
18.
BlusséL (2015) Northern European Empire in Asia: the VOC. In: HamishS (ed.) Oxford Handbook of Early Modern European History 1350-1750. Volume 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 227–253.
19.
BorschbergP (1999) Hugo Grotius, East India Trade and the King of Johur. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies30(2): 225–248.
20.
BorschbergP (2006) ‘Hugo Grotius’ Theory of Trans-Oceanic Trade Regulation: Revisiting Mare Liberum (1609), 1–60. IILJ Working Paper.
21.
BorschbergP (2017) Lost in Translation? The Languages of Euro-Southeast Asian Diplomacy in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. In: RichterRMeurer (eds) Konstruktionen Europas in der Fruhen Neuzeit. Heidelberg: Heidelberg University Publishing, 287–312.
22.
BorschbergP (2019) Cornelis Matelief, Hugo Grotius, and the King of Siam (1605–1616): agency, initiative and diplomacy. Modern Asian Studies54(1): 123–156.
23.
BoucherD (1998) Political Theories of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
24.
BranchJ (2010) Colonial reflection and territoriality: the peripheral origins of sovereign statehood. European Journal of International Relations18(2): 277–297.
25.
BroekmanIHelmersH (2007) ‘Het hart des Offraers’ - The Dutch Gift as an Act of Self-Representation. Dutch Crossing31(2): 223–252.
26.
BrownSR (2011) 1494: How a Family Feud in Medieval Spain Divided the World in Half. New York: St Martins’ Press.
27.
BullH. ([1977]1995) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
28.
BullH (1992) The importance of Grotius in the study of international relations. In: HedleyBBenedictKAdamR (eds) Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
29.
BullHWatsonA (1984) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
30.
BuzanB (2001) The English school: an underexploited resource in IR. Review of International Studies27(3): 471–488.
31.
BuzanB (2004) From International to World Society?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32.
BuzanB (2014a) An Introduction to the English School of International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
33.
BuzanB (2014b) The standard of civilization as an English school concept. Millennium Journal of International Studies42(3): 576–594.
34.
BuzanBLittleR (2000) International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
35.
BuzanBLittleR (2014) The historical expansion of international society. In: NavariCGreenDM (eds) Guide to the English School. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 59–76.
36.
CallahanWA (2004) Nationalising international theory: race, class and the English school. Global Society18(4): 305–323.
37.
ClaptonW (2017) Pluralism, decolonization and international society. Cambridge Review of International Affairs30(4): 350–367.
38.
ClulowA (2014) The Company and the Shogan: The Dutch Encounter with Tokugawa Japan. New York: Columbia University Press.
39.
ClulowAMostertT (eds) (2018) The Dutch and English East India Companies: Diplomacy, Trade and Violence in Early Modern Asia. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
40.
ColásA (2016) Barbary Coast in the expansion of international society: piracy, privateering, and corsairing as primary institutions. Review of International Studies42(5): 840–857.
41.
DunneTReus-SmitC (2017) The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
FitzmauriceA (2004) The ideology of early modern colonisation. History Compass2(1): 1–14.
43.
FrigoD (ed.) and BeltonA (trans) (2011) Politics and Diplomacy in Early Modern Italy: The Structure of Diplomatic Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
GongGW (1984) China’s entry into international society. In: BullWatson (eds) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
45.
HartM (2000) Warfare and capitalism: the impact of the economy on state making in northwestern Europe, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Review: A Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center23(2): 209–228.
46.
HellmannGValbjornM (2017) Problematizing global challenges: recalibrating the “inter” in IR-Theory. International Studies Review19(2): 279–309.
47.
HobsonJM (2009) Provincializing Westphalia: the eastern origins of sovereignty. International Politics46(6): 671–690.
48.
HobsonJM (2012) The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory 1760–2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49.
IkedaJ (2010) The post western turn in international theory and the English school. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies9(1): 29–44.
50.
IsraelJ (1977) A conflict of empires: Spain and the Netherlands, 1618–1648. Past and Present76(1): 34–74.
51.
IsraelJ (1998) The Dutch Republic: Its Rise, Greatness and Fall 1477–1806. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
52.
KaczmarskaK (2018) Reification in IR: the process and consequences of reifying the idea of international society. International Studies Review21(3): 347–372.
53.
KayaogluT (2010) Westphalian eurocentrism in international relations theory. International Studies Review12(2): 193–217.
54.
KeeneE (2002) Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55.
KeeneE (2005) International Political Thought. Cambridge: Polity Press.
56.
KeeneE (2008) The English school and British historians. Millennium Journal of International Studies37(2): 381–393.
57.
KeeneE (2014) The standard of ‘civilization’, the expansion thesis and the 19th century international social space. Millennium Journal of International Studies42(3): 651–673.
58.
KirkTA (2005) Genoa and the Sea: Policy and Power in an Early Modern Maritime Republic, 1559–1684. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.
59.
KloosterW (2016) The Dutch Moment: War, Trade, and Settlement in the Seventeenth-Century Atlantic World. New York: Cornell University Press.
60.
KoskenniemiM (2011) Histories of international law: dealing with Eurocentrism. Rechtsgeschichte19(1): 152–176.
61.
KrischerAJThiessenHV (2019) Diplomacy in a global early modernity: the ambiguity of Sovereignty. The International History Review41(5): 1100–1107.
62.
LawsonGGoJ (2017) Global Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63.
LeiraH (2015) Private force and the emergence of the international system. In: RitaAAnnaL (eds) Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies. London: Routledge, 30–38.
64.
LinklaterA (2005) The English school. In: BurchillLDevetakDPatersonR-S, et al. (eds) Theories of International Relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
65.
LinklaterA (2010) The english school conception of international society: reflections on western and non-western perspectives. Ritsumeikan Annual Review of International Studies9(1): 1–13.
66.
LittleR (2004) The English school and world history. In: AlexJB (ed.) International Society and its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
67.
ManckeE (1999) Early modern expansion and the politicization of oceanic space. The Geographical Review89(2): 225–236.
68.
MattheeR (2004) Negotiating across cultures: the Dutch van Leene mission to the Iranian court of shah sulayman 1689-1692. Eurasian Studies3(1): 35–63.
69.
MeersbergenGV (2017) The merchant diplomat in comparative perspective: embassies to the court of Aurangzeb 1660–66. In: SowerbyTHenningsJ (eds) Practices of Diplomacy in the Early Modern World 1410–1800. London: Routledge, 147–165.
70.
MeersbergenGV (2019) The diplomatic repertoires of the East India companies in Mughal South Asia 1608–1717. The Historical Journal62(4): 875–898.
71.
MeuweseM (2013) The states general and the Stadholder: Dutch diplomatic practices in the Atlantic World before the West India Company. Journal of Early American History3(1): 43–58.
72.
MillerJC (ed.) (2015) The Princeton Companion to Atlantic History. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
73.
MostertT (2018) The Scramble for Spices: Makassar’s role in European and Asian Competition in the Eastern Archipelago up to 1616. In: ClulowMostert (eds) The Dutch and English East India Companies; Diplomacy, Trade and Violence in Early Modern Asia. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Press, 25–54.
74.
MulichJ (2018) Transformation at the margins: imperial expansion and systemic change in world politics. Review of International Studies44(4): 694–716.
75.
NeumannIB (2013) Diplomatic Sites: A Critical Enquiry. London: C. Hurst & Co.
76.
O’HaganJ (2017) The role of civilization in the globalization of international society. In: DunneReus-Smit (eds) The Globalization of International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–203.
77.
ParkerG (1976) Why did the Dutch revolt last eighty years?Transactions of the Royal Historical Society26(1): 53–72.
78.
PellaJA (2014) Expanding the expansion of international society: a new approach with empirical illustrations from West African and European Interaction, 1400–1883. Journal of International Relations and Development17(1): 89–111.
79.
PhilipsA (2017) Company sovereigns, private violence and colonialism. The Routledge Handbook of Private Security Studies, London: Routledge, 39–48.
80.
PhilipsASharmanJC (2015a) International Order in Diversity: War, Trade and Rule in the Indian Ocean, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81.
PhilipsASharmanJC (2015b) Explaining durable diversity in international systems: state, company and Empire in the Indian Ocean. International Studies Quarterly59(3): 436–448.
82.
PimentelJ (2000) The Iberian vision: science and empire in the framework of a universal Monarchy, 1500–1800. Osiris15(1): 17–30.
83.
PorrasIM (2005) Constructing international law in the East Indian Seas: property, sovereignty, commerce and war in Hugo Grotius’ De Jure Praedae- the law of prize and booty, or “how to distinguish merchants from pirates. Brook Journal of International Law31(3): 741–804.
84.
PourmokhtariN (2013) A postcolonial critique of state sovereignty in IR: the contradictory legacy of a west-centric discipline. Third World Quarterly34(10): 1767–1793.
RommelseGA (2011) An early modern naval revolution? The relationship between ‘economic reason of state’ and maritime warfare. Journal for Maritime Research13(2): 138–150.
87.
RuanglsipB (2007) Dutch East India Company Merchants at the Court of Ayutthaya. Leiden: Brill.
88.
SchnurmannC (2003) Wherever profit leads us to every sea and shore…the VOC, the WIC, and Dutch methods of globalization in the seventeenth century. Renaissance Studies17(3): 474–493.
89.
SethS (2011) Postcolonial theory and the critique of international relations. Millennium Journal of International Studies40(1): 167–183.
90.
SharmanJC (2019a) Power and profit at sea: the rise of the west in the making of the international system. International Security43(4): 163–196.
91.
SharmanJC (2019b) Empires of the Weak. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
92.
SharpP (2003) Herbert butterfield, the English School and the civilizing virtues of diplomacy. International Affairs79(4): 855–878.
93.
SowerbyTA (2016) Early modern diplomatic history. History Compass14(9): 441–456.
94.
SternPJ (2008) A polities of civil & military power: political thought and the late seventeenth-century foundations of the East India Company State. Journal of British Studies47(2): 253–283.
95.
SternPJ (2009) History and historiography of the English east India company: past, present and future. History Compass7(4): 1146–1180.
96.
StivachtisYA (2013) The english school and the concept of ‘empire’: theoretical and practical/political implications. Global Discourse3(1): 129–135.
97.
SuzukiS (2005) Japan’s socialization into Janus-Faced European international society. European Journal of International Relations11(1): 137–164.
98.
SwanC (2017) Dutch diplomacy and trade in Rariteyten in Global Gifts. In: BierdermannZGerritsenARielloG (eds) The Material Culture of Diplomacy in Early Modern Eurasia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99.
TuckR (2001) The Rights of War and Peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
100.
VanIM (2010) The long goodbye: Hugo Grotius’ justification of Dutch expansion overseas 1615–1645. History of European Ideas36(4): 386–411.
101.
VanIM (2016) Debating natural law in the Banda Islands: a case study in Anglo-Dutch imperial competition in the East Indies 1609–1621. History of European Ideas42(4): 459–501.
102.
VanWR (2008) Slave trading and slavery in the Dutch Colonial Empire: a global comparison. New West Indian Guide82(1–2): 47–96.
103.
VivoFD (2003) Historical justifications of Venetian power in the Adriatic. Journal of the History of Ideas64(2): 159–176.
104.
WalkerRBJ (2010) After the Globe, Before the World. London: Routledge.
105.
WatsonA (1982) Diplomacy: the Dialogue Between States. London: Routledge.
106.
WatsonA (1992) The Evolution of International Society. London: Routledge.
107.
WeststeijnA (2012) Republican Empire: colonialism, commerce and corruption in the Dutch Golden Age. Renaissance Studies26(4): 491–509.
108.
WeststeijnA (2014) The VOC as a company state: debating seventeenth century Dutch colonial expansion. Itinerario38(1): 13–34.
109.
WilsonE (2009) Making the world safe for Holland: “de indis” of Hugo Grotius and international law as Geoculture. Review: Journal of the Fernand Braudel Center32(3): 239–287.
110.
WilsonE (2016) The “alexandrowicz thesis” revisited: Hugo Grotius, divisible sovereignty, and private avengers within the Indian Ocean world system. In: OoiKGHoangAT (eds) Early Modern Southeast Asia, 1350–1800. Oxon: Routledge.
111.
ZhangX (2011) China in the conception of international society. Review of International Studies37(2): 763–786.
112.
ZhangYSuzukiSQuirkJ (2016) International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. London: Routledge.
