The relationship between the English School's notion of `international society' or the `society of states' and various more sociologically informed conceptions of `world' or `global' society is here examined. The English School is located as a variant of classical realism and its notion of `international society' is then explicated by means of a contrast to the neo-realist idea of an international system. The English School's confrontation with John Burton's `cobweb' model of world society is then described and the potential for a relationship between a society of states and the Stanford School's conception of global society is argued. Modern systems theory is less compatible with English School thinking although the related notion of a world system has some affinities, especially with reference to its interest in the history of the modern world system. Finally, some difficulties with the conception of norms employed by the English School are outlined.
Albert, Mathias
(1999) `Observing World Politics. Luhmann's Systems Theory of Society and International Relations', Millennium: Journal of International Studies28(2): 236-265.
2.
Albert, Mathias
, Lothar Brock and Klaus Dieter Wolf (eds) (2000) Civilizing World Politics: Society and Community Beyond the State. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
3.
Ashley, Richard
(1984) `The Poverty of Neorealism', International Organisation38: 225-286.
4.
Baldwin, David A.
(ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Brown, Chris
(1995) `International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way', Review of International Studies21(2): 183-196.
6.
Bull, Hedley
(1969) `International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach', in Klaus Knorr and James Rosenau (eds) Contending Approaches to International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
Bull, Hedley
(1977) The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.
8.
Burton, John W.
(1968) Systems, States, Diplomacy and Rules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
Burton, John W.
(1969) Conflict and Communication: The Use of Controlled Communication in International Relations. New York: Free Press.
10.
Burton, John W.
(1972) World Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Burton, John
(1979) Deviance, Terrorism and War. New York: St Martin's Press.
12.
Burton, John W.et al.
(1974) `The Study of World Society: A London Perspective', mimeo.
13.
Butterfield, Herbert
and Martin Wight (1966) Diplomatic Investigations. London: George Allen and Unwin.
14.
Buzan, Barry
(1999) `The English School as a Research Programme', mimeo, BISA Conference, Manchester.
15.
Donelan, Michael
(ed.) (1978) The Reason of States. London: Allen and Unwin.
16.
Dunne, Tim
(1995) `The Social Construction of International Society', European Journal of International Relations1(3): 367-389.
17.
Dunne, Tim
(1998) Inventing International Society. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
18.
Finnis, John
(1980) Natural Law and Natural Rights. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19.
Frost, Mervyn
(1996) Ethics in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20.
Gilpin, Robert
(1984) `The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism', International Organisation38: 287-304.
21.
Gong, G.C.
(1984) The Standard of `Civilisation' in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22.
Hall, Rodney Bruce
(1999) National Collective Identities: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
23.
James, Alan
(1982) `Michael Nicholson on Martin Wight: A Mind Passing in the Night', Review of International Studies8(2): 117-124.
24.
James, Alan
(1993) `System or Society', Review of International Studies19(3): 269-288.
25.
Jones, Roy E.
(1981) `The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure', Review of International Studies7(1): 1-14.
26.
Krasner, Stephen
(1999) Sovereignty: Organised Hypocrisy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
27.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
(1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
(1995) `Sovereignty as Dominium', in G. Lyons and M. Mastanduno (eds) Beyond Westphalia: State Sovereignty and Intervention, pp. 21-42. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
29.
Luhmann, Niklas
(1997) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (2 vols). Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.
30.
Meyer, John
, John Boli, George Thomas and Francisco Ramirez (1997) `World Society and the Nation State', American Sociological Review62: 171-190.
31.
Nardin, Terry
(1983) Law, Morality and the Relations of Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32.
Nicholson, Michael
(1981) `The Enigma of Martin Wight', Review of International Studies7(1): 15-22.
33.
Nicholson, Michael
(1982) `Martin Wight: Enigma or Error?', Review of International Studies8(2): 125-128.
34.
Oakeshott, Michael
(1975) On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35.
Shaw, Martin
(1994) Global Society and International Relations. Cambridge: Polity Press.
36.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1959) Man, the State and War. New York: Columbia University Press.
37.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
38.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1997) `Evaluating Theories', American Political Science Review91(4): 913-918.
39.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40.
Wheeler, N.J.
(1992) `Pluralist and Solidarist Conceptions of International Society: Bull and Vincent on Humanitarian Intervention', Millennium: Journal of International Studies21(3): 463-487.
41.
Wheeler, N.J.
(2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42.
Wight, Martin
(1977) Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
43.
Wight, Martin
(1978) Power Politics. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
44.
Wight, Martin
(1991) International Theory: The Three Traditions. [Gabrielle Wight and Brian Porter (eds)] Leicester: Leicester University Press.
