Can aid create political trust in conflict-affected states? International aid organizations often argue that supporting states in providing basic services can contribute to strengthening state–society relations. Previous studies in international development have indicated that the provision of basic services can indeed improve people’s attitudes towards state institutions. We take this research a step further: in addition to analysing the impact of aid on political trust, we assess how violence influences this effect. We argue that aid can create opportunities for constructive state–society interactions. As violence increases, however, development-related interactions are crowded out by security-related ones. Violence also fosters corrupt aid governance, which undermines the positive effects of aid on public perceptions. We analyse this hypothesis with a mixed-methods research design that combines original opinion survey data with qualitative interview material systematically collected in 252 villages of northeast Afghanistan. Based on a combination of (a) quantitative analyses, (b) a comparison of most-similar villages, (c) a systematic comparison of qualitative survey response patterns across levels of insecurity, and (d) an in-depth analysis of interview material on aid and trust in highly insecure areas, we show that violence negatively impacts the relative relevance as well as the quality of aid-related state–society interactions. These findings indicate that international aid agencies should refocus from mainly output-oriented project appraisal, design, and monitoring to a stronger process orientation that maximizes state–society interaction and prevents elite capture in areas exposed to high levels of violence.
Asia Foundation (2007) An Assessment of Sub-National Governance in Afghanistan. San Francisco, CA: Asia Foundation.
3.
AskvikS (2008) Trust in the post-apartheid government of South Africa: the roles of identity and policy performance. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics46(4): 516–539.
4.
AskvikSJamilIDhakalTN (2011) Citizens’ trust in public and political institutions in Nepal. International Political Science Review32(4): 417–437.
5.
BauerMBlattmanCChytilováJ, et al. (2016) Can war foster cooperation?Journal of Economic Perspectives30(3): 249–274.
6.
BeathAChristiaFEnikolopovR (2015) The national solidarity programme: assessing the effects of community-driven development in Afghanistan. International Peacekeeping22(4): 302–320.
7.
BellinaSDarbonDSundstøl EriksenS, et al. (2009) The legitimacy of the state in fragile situations. Report for the OECD DAC International Network on Conflict and Fragility, OECD, Paris.
8.
BermanEFelterJHShapiroJN, et al. (2013) Modest, secure, and informed: successful development in conflict zones. American Economic Review103(3): 512–517.
9.
BermanEShapiroJNFelterJH (2011) Can hearts and minds be bought? The economics of counterinsurgency in Iraq. Journal of Political Economy119(4): 766–819.
10.
BlattmanCFialaNMartinezS (2012) Employment generation in rural Africa - mid-term results from an experimental evaluation of the youth opportunities program in Northern Uganda. Report. Berlin: Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
11.
BoeckmannRJSmithHJHuoYJ (1997) Social Justice in a Diverse Society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
12.
BrinkerhoffDW (2005) Rebuilding governance in failed states and post-conflict societies: core concepts and cross-cutting themes. Public Administration and Development25(1): 3–14.
13.
BrinkerhoffDWWetterbergADunnS (2012) Service delivery and legitimacy in fragile and conflict-affected states. Public Management Review14(2): 273–293.
14.
CallCT (2011) Beyond the ‘failed State’: toward conceptual alternatives. European Journal of International Relations17(2): 303–326.
15.
Canetti-NisimDHalperinESharvitK, et al. (2009) A new stress-based model of political extremism personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution53(1): 363–389.
16.
CaseyKGlennersterRMiguelE (2013) The GoBifo project evaluation report: assessing the impacts of communitydriven development in Sierra Leone, 3ie Impact Evaluation Report. Report. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.
17.
CrostBFelterJHJohnstonPB (2016) Conditional cash transfers, civil conflict and insurgent influence: experimental evidence from the Philippines. Journal of Development Economics118(1): 171–182.
18.
De JuanAPierskallaJH (2016) Civil war violence and political trust: Microlevel evidence from Nepal. Conflict Management and Peace Science33(1): 67–88.
19.
DenizerCKaufmannDKraayA (2013) Good countries or good projects? Macro and micro correlates of World Bank project performance. Journal of Development Economics105(2013): 288–302.
20.
DietrichS (2013) Bypass or engage? Explaining donor delivery tactics in foreign aid allocation*. International Studies Quarterly57(4): 698–712.
21.
DixSHussmannKWaltonG (2012) Risks of corruption to state legitimacy and stability in fragile situations. Report. Bergen: U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre.
22.
DyrstadK (2013) Does civil war breed authoritarian values? An empirical study of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo and Croatia. Democratization20(7): 1219–1242.
23.
EastonD (1975) A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science5(4): 435–457.
24.
FeldmanSStennerK (1997) Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology18(4): 741–770.
25.
FiskKCherneyA (2016) Pathways to institutional legitimacy in postconflict societies: perceptions of process and performance in Nepal. Governance30(2): 263–281.
26.
GilleyB (2006) The meaning and measure of state legitimacy: results for 72 countries. European Journal of Political Research45(3): 499–525.
27.
GiustozziAReuterC (2011) The insurgents of the Afghan north. AAN Thematic Report, 04, Afghanistan Analysts Network, Kabul, Afghanistan.
28.
GoodhandJHakimiA (2013) Counterinsurgency, local militias, and statebuilding in Afghanistan. Report. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.
29.
GuerreroA (2011) Rebuilding Trust in Government via Service Delivery: The Case of Medellin, Colombia. Washington, DC: World Bank.
30.
HainmuellerJMummoloJXuY (2018) How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis27(2): 1–30.
31.
HumphreysMde la SierraRSvan der WindtP (2014) Social and economic impacts of Tuungane: final report on the effects of a community driven reconstruction program in Eastern democratic republic of Congo. Report. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie).
32.
KantorD (2012) MAHAPICK: Stata module to select matching observations based on a Mahalanobis distance measure.
33.
KilcullenSA (2011) The Accidental Guerrilla: Fighting Small Wars in the Midst of a Big One. Reprint edn. New York: Oxford University Press.
34.
KoehlerJ (2014) The Afghan perspective on ISAF – changes and trends in North-East Afghanistan. In: ChiariB (ed.) From Venus to Mars? Provincial Reconstruction Teams and the European Military Experience in Afghanistan, 2001–2014. Freiburg im Breisgau: Rombach Verlag KG, 65–86.
35.
KramerRM (1999) Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology50(1): 569–598.
36.
LambR (2012) Formal and informal governance in Afghanistan: reflections on a survey of the Afghan People, Part 1 of 4. Occasional Paper, Asia Foundation.
LindEATylerTR (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
39.
LuhmannN (1968) Vertrauen: ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexität. Stuttgart: F. Enke.
40.
MallettRHagen-ZankerJSlaterR, et al. (2015) Surveying livelihoods, service delivery and governance: baseline evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Uganda, Working Paper. Ovserseas Development Institute.
41.
ManiR (1999) Contextualizing police reform: security, the rule of law and post-conflict peacebuilding. International Peacekeeping6(4): 9–26.
42.
McChrystalSA (2009) Commander’s initial assessment (unclassified with removal of enclosure) (30.08.2009). Headquarters International Security Assistance Force, Kabul, Afghanistan.
43.
McloughlinC (2015) When does service delivery improve the legitimacy of a fragile or conflict-affected state?Governance28(3): 341–356.
44.
MukhopadhyayD (2014) Warlords, Strongman Governors, and the State in Afghanistan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MurtazashviliJB (2016) Informal Order and the State in Afghanistan. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46.
NaglJASchoomakerPJ (2005) Learning to Eat Soup With a Knife: Counterinsurgency Lessons From Malaya and Vietnam. 1st edn. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
47.
NarangNStantonJA (2017) A strategic logic of attacking aid workers: evidence from violence in Afghanistan. International Studies Quarterly61(1): 38–51.
48.
NixonH (2008) The Changing Face of Local Governance: Community Development Councils in Afghanistan. Kabul, Afghanistan: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).
49.
RashidA (2010) Taliban: Militant Islam, Oil and Fundamentalism in Central Asia. 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
50.
RothsteinBTheorellJ (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance21(2): 165–190.
51.
RubinBR (2002) The Fragmentation of Afghanistan: State Formation and Collapse in the International System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
52.
SacksA (2012) Can Donors and Non-State Actors Undermine Citizens’ Legitimating Beliefs?Washington, DC: World Bank.
53.
SacksALarizzaM (2012) Why quality matters: rebuilding trustworthy local government in post-conflict Sierra Leone. Policy Research Working Papers. The World Bank.
54.
SaltmarsheDAbhilashM (2011) Local Governance in Afghanistan: A View from the Ground. Kabul: Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU).
55.
ShahraniN (2008) Taliban and Talibanism in historical perspective. In: CrewsR (ed.) The Taliban and the Crisis of Afghanistan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 155–181.
56.
SturgisPSmithP (2010) Assessing the validity of generalized trust questions: what kind of trust are we measuring?International Journal of Public Opinion Research22(1): 74–92.
57.
SuhrkeA (2012) When More is Less: The International Project in Afghanistan. New York: Columbia University Press.
58.
SundbergRMelanderE (2013) Introducing the UCDP georeferenced event dataset. Journal of Peace Research50(4): 523–532.
59.
Sztompka (2008) Trust: A Sociological Theory. New edn. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.
60.
Van de WalleSScottZ (2009) The role of public services in state- and nation building: exploring lessons from European history for fragile states. GSDRC Research Paper, Governance and Social Development Resource Centre, Birmingham
61.
WildeAMielkeK (2013) Order, stability, and change in Afghanistan: from top-down to bottom-up state-making. Central Asian Survey32(3): 353–370.
62.
WintersMS (2014) Targeting, accountability and capture in development projects. International Studies Quarterly58(2): 393–404.
63.
WongP-H (2016) How can political trust be built after civil wars? Evidence from post-conflict Sierra Leone. Journal of Peace Research53(6): 772–785.
64.
World Bank (2011) World Development Report: Conflict, Security, and Development. 2011 edn. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
65.
WörmerN (2012) The networks of Kunduz: a history of conflict and their actors, from 1992 to 2001. Kabul: Afghanistan Analysts Network.
66.
ZaeefAS (2011) My Life With the Taliban. 1st edn. London: Hurst.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
