A key component of (neo-)functionalist and constructivist approaches to the study of international organizations concerns staff socialization. Existing analyses of how, or indeed whether, staff develop more pro-internationalist attitudes over time draw predominantly on cross-sectional data. Yet, such data cannot address (self-)selection issues or capture the inherently temporal nature of attitude change. This article proposes an innovative approach to the study of international socialization using an explicitly longitudinal design. Analysing two waves of a large-scale survey conducted within the European Commission in 2008 and 2014, it examines the beliefs and values of the same individuals over time and exploits exogenous organizational changes to identify causal effects. Furthermore, the article theorizes and assesses specified scope conditions affecting socialization processes. Showing that international institutions do, in fact, influence value acquisition by individual bureaucrats, our results contest the widely held view that international organizations are not a socializing environment. Our analysis also demonstrates that age at entry and gender significantly affect the intensity of such value change.
AbbottKWGreenJFKeohaneRO (2016) Organizational ecology and institutional change in global governance. International Organization70(2): 247–277.
2.
AshforthBESlussDMHarrisonSH (2007) Socialization in organizational contexts. In: HodgkinsonGPFordJK (eds) International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (vol. 22). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 1–70.
3.
AvantDDFinnemoreMSellSK (eds) (2010) Who Governs the Globe?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4.
AvenFFParkerBMcEvoyGM (1993) Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research26: 63–73.
5.
BanC (2013) Management and Culture in an Enlarged European Commission. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BarnettMFinnemoreM (1999) The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization53(4): 699–732.
7.
BellouV (2007) Psychological contract assessment after a major organizational change: The case of mergers and acquisitions. Employee Relations29(19): 68–88.
8.
BertrandMDufloEMullainathanS (2004) How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics119(1): 249–275.
9.
BesBJ (2017) Under Pressure! The Institutional Role Conceptions of Commission Officials in an Era of Politicization. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
10.
BeyersJ (2005) Multiple embeddedness and socialization in Europe: The case of Council officials. International Organization59(4): 899–936.
11.
BeyersJ (2010) Conceptual and methodological challenges in the study of European socialization. Journal of European Public Policy17(6): 909–920.
12.
BullisCBachBW (1989) Socialization turning points: An examination of change in organization identification. Western Journal of Speech Communication53: 273–293.
13.
BurkeRJLeiterMP (2000) Contemporary organizational realities and professional efficacy: Downsizing, reorganization and transition. In: DewePLeiterMPCoxT (eds) Coping, Health and Organizations. New York, NY: Taylor Francis, pp. 237–258.
14.
ChatmanJA (1991) Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly36: 459–484.
15.
CheckelJT (2005) International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization59: 801–826.
16.
CheckelJT (2017) Socialization and violence: Introduction and framework. Journal of Peace Research54(5): 592–605.
17.
CohenDK (2017) The ties that bind: How armed groups use violence to socialize fighters. Journal of Peace Research54(5): 701–714.
CookT (1985) The bear market in political socialization and the costs of misunderstood psychological theories. American Political Science Review79(4): 1079–1093.
20.
CostaOJorgensenKE (2012) The Influence of International Institutions on the EU. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
21.
De JongTWiezerNDe WeerdM, et al. (2016) The impact of restructuring on employee well-being: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress30(1): 91–114.
22.
DraperP (1985) Two views of sex differences in socialization. In: HallRL (ed.) Male–Female Differences: A Bio-cultural Perspective. New York, NY: Praeger, pp. 5–25.
23.
EgeJBauerMW (2013) International bureaucracies from a public administration and international relations perspective. In: ReinaldaB (ed.) Routledge Handbook of International Organization. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 135–148.
24.
European Communities (2004) Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities and Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Communities. Brussels: European Communities.
25.
FrancoLMBennettSKanferR (2002) Health sector reform and public sector health worker motivation: A conceptual framework. Social Science and Medicine54: 1255–1266.
26.
GheciuA (2005) Security institutions as agents of socialization? NATO and the ‘new Europe’. International Organization59(4): 973–1012.
27.
GleibsIHMummendeyANoackP (2008) Predictors of change in postmerger identification during a merger process: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology95(5): 1095–1112.
28.
GruberL (2000) Ruling the World: Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
HaasEB (1964) Beyond the Nation State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30.
HatmakerDMParkHH (2014) Who are all these people? Longitudinal changes in new employee social networks within a state agency. American Review of Public Administration44(6): 716–739.
31.
HoogheL (2003) Europe divided? Elites versus public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics4: 281–304.
32.
HoogheL (2005) Several roads lead to international norms, but few via international socialization. A case study of the European Commission. International Organization59(4): 861–898.
33.
HoogheL (2012) Images of Europe: How Commission officials conceive their institution’s role. Journal of Common Market Studies50(1): 87–111.
34.
HuddyLTerkildsenN (1993) Gender stereotypes and the perception of male and female candidates. American Journal of Political Science37(1): 119–147.
35.
JohnstonAI (2001) Treating international institutions as social environments. International Studies Quarterly45: 487–515.
36.
JohnstonAI (2005) Conclusions and extensions: Toward mid-range theorizing and beyond Europe. International Organization59(4): 1013–1044.
37.
KassimHPetersonJBauerM, et al. (2013) The European Commission of the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38.
KavanaghMHAshkanasyNM (2006) The impact of leadership and change management strategy on organizational culture and individual acceptance of change during a merger. British Journal of Management17(S1): S81–S103.
39.
KeohaneRO (1969) Institutionalization in the United Nations General Assembly. International Organization23(4): 859–896.
40.
KeohaneRO (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41.
KjeldsenAJacobsenCB (2013) Public service motivation and employment sector: Attraction or socialization?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory23(4): 899–926.
42.
LefkowitzJ (1994) Sex-related differences in job attitudes and dispositional variables: Now you see them…Academy of Management Journal37(2): 323–349.
43.
LewisJ (2005) The Janus face of Brussels: Socialization and everyday decision making in the European Union. International Organization59(4): 937–971.
44.
LinosK (2011) Diffusion through democracy. American Journal of Political Science55(3): 678–695.
45.
LouisMR (1980) Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly25: 226–251.
46.
MartinLLSimmonsB (1998) Theories and empirical studies on international institutions. International Organization52(4): 729–757.
47.
MurdochZ (2012) Negotiating the European External Action Service (EEAS): Analyzing the external effects of internal (dis)agreement. Journal of Common Market Studies50(6): 1011–1027.
48.
MurdochZGeysB (2012) Instrumental calculation, cognitive role-playing, or both? Self-perceptions of seconded national experts in the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy19(9): 1357–1376.
49.
RaginsBRSundstromE (1989) Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin105: 51–88.
50.
RoseAJRudolphKD (2006) A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin132(1): 98–131.
51.
RudolphKDConleyCS (2005) Socioemotional costs and benefits of social-evaluative concerns: Do girls care too much?Journal of Personality73(1): 115–137.
52.
SaksAMAshforthBE (1997) Organizational socialization: Making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. Journal of Vocational Behavior51: 234–279.
53.
SchaferJ (2014) European Commission officials’ policy attitudes. Journal of Common Market Studies52(4): 911–927.
54.
Schön-QuinlivanE (2011) Reforming the European Commission. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
SewellJP (1966) Functionalism and World Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56.
SigelRS (1995) New directions for political socialization research: Thoughts and suggestions. Perspectives on Political Science24(1): 17–22.
57.
SuvarierolSBusuiocMGroenleerM (2013) Working for Europe? Socialisation in the European Commission and agencies of the European Union. Public Administration91(4): 908–927.
58.
WaltzK (1979) Theory of International Politics. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
59.
WolfP (1973) International organization and attitude change: A re-examination of the functionalist approach. International Organization27(3): 347–371.
60.
YangKPandeySK (2009) How do perceived political environment and administrative reform affect employee commitment?Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory19: 335–360.
61.
ZürnMCheckelJT (2005) Getting socialized to build bridges: Constructivism and rationalism. International Organization59(4): 1045–1079.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
