The self-determination of peoples is a fundamental legitimating principle of the international system; it justifies the system’s very existence. Through a vast diachronic corpus and pertinent data sets, this article nevertheless reveals a puzzling decline in the public discourse on, and practice of, self-determination over the last 50 years. I identify and assess four structural explanations for this decline: “lexical change” (replacing self-determination with alternative terms); “silent hegemony” (taking the norm for granted); “reactive rhetoric” (echoing conflicts and new state formation post hoc); and “mission accomplished” (rectifying the incongruence between national boundaries and state borders). Complementing these structural causes with agential reasons, I further suggest that powerful state actors and persuasive academics have sought to “tame” self-determination as both principle and practice, retaining the term but altering its meaning from a source of threat into a resource for containing it. Self-determination, however, has not been eliminated, and taming it may yet prove a pyrrhic victory.
AbulofU (2015a) The confused compass: From self-determination to state-determination. Ethnopolitics In press.
2.
AbulofU (2015b) The Mortality and Morality of Nations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
3.
AbulofU (2015c) Normative concepts analysis: Unpacking the language of legitimation. International Journal of Social Research Methodology18(1): 73–89.
4.
AbulofU (2016a) Mirage or vision: Binationalism in theory and practice. Ethnopolitics In press.
5.
AbulofU (2016b) Public political thought: Bridging the sociological–philosophical divide in the study of legitimacy. British Journal of Sociology In press.
6.
AlesinaADevleeschauwerAEasterlyW. (2003) Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 155–194.
7.
ArchibugiD (2003) A critical analysis of the self-determination of peoples: A cosmopolitan perspective. Constellations10(4): 488–505.
8.
BallTFarrJHansonRL (eds) (1989) Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BarkinJSCroninB (1994) The state and the nation: Changing norms and the rules of sovereignty in International Relations. International Organization48(1): 107–130.
10.
BeissingerMR (2002) Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Ben-Josef HirschM (2014) Ideational change and the emergence of the international norm of truth and reconciliation commissions. European Journal of International Relations20(3): 810–833.
12.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1967) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Press.
13.
BuchananA (1997) Theories of secession. Philosophy and Public Affairs26(1): 31–61.
14.
CarrEH (2001 [1939]) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. New York, NY: Palgrave.
15.
CarterDBGoemansHE (2011) The making of the territorial order: New borders and the emergence of interstate conflict. International Organization65(2): 275–309.
16.
CastellinoJ (2000) International Law and Self-Determination: The Interplay of the Politics of Territorial Possession with Formulations of Post-Colonial National Identity. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
17.
CedermanL-E (1997) Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18.
CedermanL-EWimmerAMinB (2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics62(1): 87–119.
19.
CedermanL-ESkrede GleditschKSalehyanI. (2013) Transborder ethnic kin and civil war. International Organization67(2): 389–410.
20.
ChernevB (2011) The Brest-Litovsk Moment: Self-determination discourse in Eastern Europe before Wilsonianism. Diplomacy & Statecraft22(3): 369–387.
21.
CogginsB (2011) Friends in high places: International politics and the emergence of states from secessionism. International Organization65(3): 433–467.
22.
ConnorW (1967) Self-determination: The new phase. World Politics20(1): 30–53.
23.
ConnorW (2002) Nationalism and political illegitimacy. In: ConversiD (eds) Ethnonationalism in the Contemporary World: Walker Connor and the Study of Nationalism. New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 24–49.
24.
CooperRHVoïnov KohlerJ (eds) (2008) The Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
25.
CrawfordJ (2001) The right of self-determination in international law: Its development and future. In: AlstonP (ed.) People’s Rights. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 7–67.
26.
CrawfordNC (2002) Argument and Change in World Politics: Ethics, Decolonization, and Humanitarian Intervention. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27.
CunninghamKG (2011) Divide and conquer or divide and concede: How do states respond to internally divided separatists?American Political Science Review105(2): 275–297.
28.
CunninghamKG (2014) Inside the Politics of Self-Determination. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
29.
DahbourO (2003) Illusion of the Peoples: A Critique of National Self-Determination. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
30.
DaviesM (2010) COHA, COCA, TIME. Brigham Young University.
31.
DesmetKOrtuño-OrtínIWacziargR (2012) The political economy of linguistic cleavages. Journal of Development Economics97(2): 322–338.
32.
De VriesHWeberS (eds) (1997) Violence, Identity, and Self-Determination. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33.
DillardHC (1975) Separate opinion. In: International Court of Justice (ed.) Case of Western Sahara; Advisory Opinion of 16 October 1975. The Hague: International Court of Justice, pp. 116–126.
34.
EisenbergAWebberJCoulthardG. (2014) Recognition Versus Self-Determination: Dilemmas of Emancipatory Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press.
35.
EmersonR (1971) Self-determination. The American Journal of International Law65(3): 459–475.
36.
EnglebertP (2000) State Legitimacy and Development in Africa. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
37.
EtzioniA (1992) The evils of self-determination. Foreign Policy89: 21–35.
38.
FabryM (2010) Recognizing States: International Society and the Establishment of New States since 1776. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
39.
FarrJ (1989) Understanding conceptual change politically. In: BallTFarrJHansonRL (eds) Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 24–49.
40.
FazalTM (2014) The strategy of declaring independence. Unpublished conference paper presented at the ISA’s 55th Annual Convention, Toronto, Canada.
41.
FazalTMGriffithsRD (2014) Membership has its privileges: The changing benefits of statehood. International Studies Review16(1): 79–106.
42.
FearonJD (2003) Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth8(2): 195–222.
43.
FrenchD (ed.) (2013) Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
44.
FriendJW (2012) Stateless Nations: Western European Regional Nationalisms and the Old Nations. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
GansC (2002) The Limits of Nationalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
46.
GardnerA-M (2008) Beyond standards before status: Democratic governance and non-state actors. Review of International Studies34(3): 531–552.
47.
GatAYakobsonA (2013) Nations: The Long History and Deep Roots of Political Ethnicity and Nationalism. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
48.
GellnerE (2006) Nations and Nationalism (2nd edn). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
49.
GidonG (1994) Nations without states. Foreign Affairs73(3): 100–112.
50.
GilbertP (1998) The Philosophy of Nationalism. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
51.
GiliomeeH (2003) The Afrikaners: Biography of a People. Cape Town: University of Virginia Press.
52.
GleditschNP (2013) The forum: The decline of war. International Studies Review15(3): 396–419.
53.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonM. (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
54.
GoddardSE (2009) When right makes might: How Prussia overturned the European balance of power. International Security33(3): 110–142.
55.
GoddardSE (2010) Indivisible Territory and the Politics of Legitimacy: Jerusalem and Northern Ireland. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
56.
GoertzGDiehlPF (1992) Toward a theory of international norms: Some conceptual and measurement issues. Journal of Conflict Resolution36(4): 634–664.
57.
HaasPM (1992) Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization46(1): 1–35.
58.
HallRB (1999) National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
59.
HamiltonJMLawrenceRG (2012) Foreign Correspondence. New York, NY: Routledge.
60.
HannumH (1996) Autonomy, Sovereignty, and Self-Determination: The Accommodation of Conflicting Rights (rev. edn). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
61.
HechterMBorlandE (2001) National self-determination: The emergence of an international norm. In: HechterMOppK-D (eds) Social Norms. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 186–235.
HorneA (2006) A Savage War of Peace: Algeria, 1954–1962. New York, NY: New York Review Books.
64.
HorowitzDL (2003) The cracked foundations of the right to secede. Journal of Democracy14(2): 5–17.
65.
HowardM (1978) War and the Liberal Conscience. London: Temple Smith.
66.
HurrellA (2007) On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
67.
IslamMR (1985) Secessionist self-determination: Some lessons from Katanga, Biafra and Bangladesh. Journal of Peace Research22(3): 211–221.
68.
JacksonRH (1990) Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations, and the Third World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
69.
JahnB (2013) Liberal Internationalism: Theory, History, Practice. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
70.
JenningsI (1956) The Approach to Self-Government. Cambridge: University Press.
71.
KostovicovaD (2005) Kosovo: The Politics of Identity and Space. New York, NY: Routledge.
72.
LaitinDD (2007) Nations, States, and Violence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
73.
LansingR (1921) The Peace Negotiations, a Personal Narrative. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Company.
74.
LegroJW (1997) Which norms matter? Revisiting the “failure” of internationalism. International Organization51(1): 31–63.
75.
LeninVI (1971 [1914]) The Right of Nations to Self-Determination (trans. IsaacsB). Moscow: Progress Publishers.
76.
LöwyM (1976) Marxists and the national question. New Left Review96: 81–100.
77.
ManelaE (2007) The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
78.
MarshallMGMarshallDR (2013) Coups d’Etat, 1946–2012. Severn, MD: Center for Systemic Peace, Center for Global Policy, George Mason University and Colorado State University.
79.
MceneryTHardieA (2012) Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
80.
MillerB (2007) States, Nations, and the Great Powers: The Sources of Regional War and Peace. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
81.
MillerD (1995) On Nationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82.
Minorities at Risk Project (2009) Minorities at Risk Dataset. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.
83.
MontalvoJGReynal-QuerolM (2005) Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. The American Economic Review95(3): 796–816.
84.
MoynS (2010) The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85.
MoynihanDP (1993) Pandaemonium: Ethnicity in International Politics. London: Oxford University Press.
86.
MuiznieksNR (1995) The influence of the Baltic popular movements on the process of Soviet disintegration. Europe-Asia Studies47(1): 3–25.
87.
MullerJZ (2008) Us and them. Foreign Affairs87(2): 18–35.
88.
NeubergerB (2001) National self-determination: A theoretical discussion. Nationalities Papers29(3): 391–418.
89.
NodiaGO (1992) Nationalism and democracy. Journal of Democracy3(4): 3–22.
90.
OklopcicZ (2014) A farewell to rhetorical arms? Unravelling the self-determination of peoples. In: EisenbergAWebberJCoulthardG. (eds) Recognition Versus Self-Determination: Dilemmas of Emancipatory Politics. Vancouver: UBC Press, pp. 101–124.
91.
Pew Global Attitudes Project (2009) Two Decades after the Wall’s Fall. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
92.
PhilpottD (1995) In defense of self-determination. Ethics105(2): 352–385.
93.
PosnerDN (2004) Measuring ethnic fractionalization in Africa. American Journal of Political Science48(4): 849–863.
94.
QvortrupM (2014) Referendums and Ethnic Conflict. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
95.
Reus-SmitC (2001) Human rights and the social construction of sovereignty. Review of International Studies27(4): 519–538.
96.
RoederPG (2007) Where Nation-States Come From: Institutional Change in the Age of Nationalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
97.
RonenD (1979) The Quest for Self-Determination. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
98.
RosecranceRNSteinAA (eds) (2006) No More States? Globalization, National Self-Determination, and Terrorism. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
99.
RoshwaldA (2011) The post-1989 era as heyday of the nation-state?International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society24(1): 1–9.
100.
SambanisNSchulhofer-WohlJ (2009) What’s in a line?International Security34(2): 82–118.
101.
SambanisNShayoM (2013) Social identification and ethnic conflict. American Political Science Review107(2): 294–325.
102.
ScottD (2012) Norms of self-determination: Thinking sovereignty through. Middle East Law and Governance4(2/3): 195–224.
103.
SimpsonB (2012) The United States and the curious history of self-determination. Diplomatic History36(4): 675–694.
104.
SnyderJL (2000) From Voting to Violence: Democratization and Nationalist Conflict (1st edn). New York, NY: Norton.
105.
StarushenkoGB (1963) The Principle of National Self-Determination in Soviet Foreign Policy. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
106.
TalbottS (2000) Self-determination in an interdependent world. Foreign Policy118: 152–163.
107.
TanguyJ (2003) Redefining sovereignty and intervention. Ethics & International Affairs17(1): 141–148.
108.
Van EveraS (1994) Hypotheses on nationalism and war. International Security18(4): 5–39.
109.
Van LeeuwenT (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
110.
WalterBF (2009) Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts Are So Violent. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
111.
WalzerM (1982) The Politics of Ethnicity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
112.
WeitzED (2015) Self-determination: How a German Enlightenment idea became the slogan of national liberation and a human right. The American Historical Review120(2): 462–496.
113.
WellerM (2008) Escaping the Self-Determination Trap. Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff.
114.
WilsonW (1918) President’s address to Congress. The Washington Post, 12February.
115.
WimmerA (2013) Waves of War: Nationalism, State Formation, and Ethnic Exclusion in the Modern World. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
116.
WimmerAFeinsteinY (2010) The rise of the nation-state across the world, 1816 to 2001. American Sociological Review75(5): 764–790.
117.
WodakR (2011) Critical discourse analysis. In: HylandKPaltridgeB (eds) Continuum Companion to Discourse Analysis. New York, NY: Continuum, pp. 38–53.
118.
WoodwellD (2007) Nationalism in International Relations: Norms, Foreign Policy, and Enmity (1st edn). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
119.
YackB (2012) Nationalism and the Moral Psychology of Community. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
120.
ZacherMW (2001) The territorial integrity norm: International boundaries and the use of force. International Organization55(2): 215–250.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
