This study investigates to what extent ethnic minorities differ from majorities in the degree of confidence in the UN and the scope conditions. Emphasizing the impact of the UN’s involvement, it argues that minorities are predisposed to hold a higher degree of confidence in the UN in countries where ethnic conflict has taken place and this difference is further complicated by the nature of the countries’ political regimes. Utilizing the World Value Surveys for the period 1981–2012, we find robust evidence for our arguments. We also find that minorities probably increase in such trust as ethnic conflict persists longer.
AbdiHWilliamsLJ (2010) Jackknife. In SalkindN. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2.
AiCNortonEC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters80(1): 123–129.
3.
BeardsleyKSchmidtH (2012) Following the flag or following the charter? Examining the determinants of UN involvement in international crises, 1945–2021. International Studies Quarterly56(1): 33–49.
4.
BelgeCKarakoçE (2015) Minorities in the Middle East: Ethnicity, religion, and support for authoritarianism. Political Research Quarterly68(2): 280–292.
5.
BellucciPSandersDSerricchioF (2012) Explaining European identity. In BellucciPSandersDTokaGTorcalM (eds) The Europeanization of National Polities? Citizenship and Support in a Post-enlargement Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.
BrewerPRSteenbergenMR (2002) All against all: How beliefs about human nature shape foreign policy opinions. Political Psychology23(1): 39–58.
7.
BrewerPRGrossKAdaySWillnatL (2004) International trust and public opinion about world affairs. American Journal of Political Science48(1): 93–109.
8.
BrewerPRAdaySGrossK (2005) Do Americans trust other nations? A panel study. Social Science Quarterly86(1): 36–51.
9.
BuenodeMesquitaBDownsGWSmithACherifFM (2005) Thinking inside the box: A closer look at democracy and human rights. International Studies Quarterly49: 439–457.
10.
CaldeiraGAGibsonJL (1995) The legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the European Union: Models of institutional support. American Political Science Review89(2): 356–376.
11.
CarmentDJamesP (1998) The United Nations at 50: Managing ethnic crises—Past and present. Journal of Peace Research35(1): 61–82.
12.
CedermanL-EWimmerAMinB (2010) Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics62(1): 87–119.
13.
ChapmanC (2008) Why a minority rights approach to conflict? The case of Southern Sudan. Minority Rights Group International.
14.
CollierPHoefflerA (2004) Greed and grievance in civil war. Oxford Economic Papers56(4): 563–595.
15.
CookTEGronkeP (2005) The skeptical American: Revisiting the meanings of trust in government and confidence in institutions. Journal of Politics67: 784–803.
16.
De SoysaI (2002) Paradise is a bazaar? Greed, creed, and governance in civil war, 1989–99. Journal of Peace Research39(4): 395–416.
17.
De SoysaIVadlamannatiKC (2011) Does being bound together suffocate, or liberate? The effects of economic, social, and political globalization on human rights, 1981–2005. Kyklos64(1): 20–53.
18.
DowleyKMSilverBD (2002) Social capital, ethnicity and support for democracy in the post-Communist states. Europe–Asia Studies54(4): 505–527.
19.
DowleyKMSilverBD (2011) Support for Europe among Europe’s ethnic, religious, and immigrant minorities. International Journal of Public Opinion Research23(3): 315–337.
20.
DoyleMWSambanisN (2000) International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. The American Political Science Review94(4): 779–801.
21.
DreherA (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics38(10): 1091–1110.
22.
EdwardsMS (2009) Public support for the international economic organizations: Evidence from developing countries. The Review of International Organizations4(2): 185–209.
23.
EhinP (2007) Political support in the Baltic States: 1993–2004. Journal of Baltic Studies38(1): 1–20.
24.
ElkinsZSidesJ (2007) Can institutions build unity in multiethnic states?American Political Science Review101(4): 693–708.
25.
ErdoganE (2007) Determinants of Turkish citizens’ attitudes toward international institutions. Turkish Policy Quarterly6(4): 131–160.
26.
FortnaVP (2004) Does peacekeeping keep peace? International intervention and the duration of peace after civil war. International Studies Quarterly48(2): 269–292.
27.
FranzeseRKamC (2007) Modeling and Interpreting Interactive Hypotheses in Regression Analysis. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
28.
GilbertG (2002) The burgeoning minority rights jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly24(3): 736–780.
29.
GleditschNPWallensteenPErikssonMSollenbergMStrandH (2002) Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset.Journal of Peace Research39(5): 615–637.
30.
GriecoJMGelpiCReiflerJFeaverPD (2011) Let’s get a second opinion: International institutions and American public support for war. International Studies Quarterly55(2): 563–583.
31.
HegreHHultmanLNygårdHM (2015) Evaluating the conflict-reducing effect of UN peacekeeping operations. PRIO Working Papers.
32.
HessamiZ (2011) What determines trust in international organizations? An empirical analysis for the IMF, the World Bank, and the WTO. University of Konstanz.
HumphreysMWeinsteinJM (2006) Handling and manhandling civilians in civil war. American Political Science Review100(3): 429–447.
35.
HurdI (2005) The strategic use of liberal internationalism: Libya and the UN Sanctions, 1992–2003. International Organization59(3): 495–526.
36.
HurdI (2007) After Anarchy: Legitimacy and Power in the UN Security Council. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
37.
HydeS (2007) The observer effect in international politics: Evidence from a natural experiment. World Politics60(1): 37–63.
38.
JohnsonT (2011) Guilt by association: The link between states’ influence and the legitimacy of intergovernmental organizations. The Review of International Organizations6: 57–84.
39.
KarakoçE (2013) Ethnicity and trust in national and international institutions: Kurdish Attitudes toward Political Institutions in Turkey. Turkish Studies14(1): 92–114.
40.
KeeferP (2008) Insurgency and credible commitment in autocracies and democracies. The World Bank Economic Review22(1): 33–61.
41.
KelleyJ (2009) D-Minus elections: The politics and norms of international election observation. International Organization63(4): 765–787.
42.
KelleyJG (2006) Ethnic Politics in Europe: The Power of Norms and Incentives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
43.
LakeDARothchildD (1996) Containing fear: The origins and management of ethnic conflict. International Security21(2): 41–75.
44.
LebovicJHVoetenE (2006) The politics of shame: The condemnation of country human rights practices in the UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly50(4): 861–888.
45.
LebovicJHVoetenE (2009) The cost of shame: International organizations and foreign aid in the punishing of human rights violators. Journal of Peace Research46(1): 79–97.
46.
MarshallMGJaggersK (2012) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800–2012: Dataset users’ manual.College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
47.
PeksenD (2009) Better or worse? The effect of economic sanctions on human rights. Journal of Peace Research46(1): 59–77.
48.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (2001) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49.
RummelRJ (1995) Democracy, power, genocide, and mass murder. The Journal of Conflict Resolution39(1): 3–26.
50.
RyanS (2000) United Nations peacekeeping: A matter of principles?International Peacekeeping7(1): 27–47.
51.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002) Modeling multilevel data structures. American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
52.
TorglerB (2008) Trust in international organizations: An empirical investigation focusing on the United Nations. The Review of International Organizations3(1): 65–93.
53.
TostensenABullB (2002) Are smart sanctions feasible?World Politics54(3): 373–403.
54.
VanhanenT (2014) Measures of democracy 1810–2012 [computer file]. FSD1289.
55.
VoetenE (2013) Public opinion and the legitimacy of international courts. Theoretical Inquiries in Law14: 411–436.
56.
VreelandJR (2008) The effect of political regime on civil war: Unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution52(3): 401–425.
57.
WimmerA (1997) Who owns the state? Understanding ethnic conflict in post-colonial societies. Nations and Nationalism3: 631–666.
58.
World Bank (2016) World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
