Constructivists maintain that a shared identity was crucial for explaining the creation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the multilateral form that it took. I challenge this view, arguing instead that the alliance was based on moralistic trust, the belief that others will live up to their moral obligations. Moralistic trust facilitates the initiation of cooperation, so that states can begin a virtuous circle of trust, collaboration, and enhanced trust. It is also the foundation of the diffuse reciprocity inherent to multilateralism. In two case studies of the domestic politics in the United States of making a multilateral security commitment to Europe, the first being the League of Nations, I demonstrate that identity was not a prominent consideration and did not lead individuals to embrace multilateralism. This social-psychological account improves upon constructivism and rationalism by offering a way to embed ideational variables in studies of strategic interaction.
AchesonD (1969) Present at the Creation: My Years in the State Department, 1st edn. New York: Norton.
2.
AchillesT (1992) Fingerprints on History: The NATO Memoirs of Theodore C. Achilles. Kent, OH: Lyman L. Lemnitzer Center for NATO and European Community Studies.
3.
AdlerEBarnettMN (1998) Security communities in theoretical perspective. In: AdlerEBarnettMN (eds) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–28.
4.
AmbrosiusLE (1987) Woodrow Wilson and the American Diplomatic Tradition: The Treaty Fight in Perspective. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
AxelrodRM (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
6.
AxelrodRHamiltonWD (1981) The Evolution of Cooperation. Science211 (4489): 1390–1396.
7.
BaylisJ (1993) The Diplomacy of Pragmatism: Britain and the Formation of NATO, 1942–1949. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
8.
CookKSCooperRM (2003) Experimental studies of cooperation, trust and social exchange. In: OstromEWalkerJ (eds) Trust and Reciprocity: Interdisciplinary Lessons from Experimental Research, Vol. 6. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 209–244.
9.
CooperJM (2001) Breaking the Heart of the World: Woodrow Wilson and the Fight for the League of Nations. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
10.
CzerninF (1964) Versailles, 1919: The Forces, Events, and Personalities that Shaped the Treaty. New York: Putnam.
11.
DeutschKW (1957) Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
DoeneckeJD (1979) Not to the Swift: The Old Isolationists in the Cold War Era. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
13.
DueckC (2006) Reluctant Crusaders: Power, Culture, and Change in American Grand Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14.
FRUS (Foreign Relations of the United States) (1948) Vol. III: Western Europe. Washington, DC: United States Department of State.
15.
FRUS (1949) Vol. IV: Western Europe. Washington, DC: United States Department of State.
16.
GerringJ (2001) Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
HardinR (2001) Conceptions and explanations of trust. In: CookKS (ed.) Trust in Society, Vol. 2. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 3–39.
18.
HardinR (2006) Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
HayashiNOstromEWalkerJ. (1999) Reciprocity, trust and the sense of control: A cross-societal study. Rationality and Society11(1): 27–46.
20.
HemmerCKatzensteinPJ (2002) Why is there no NATO in Asia? Collective identity, regionalism, and the origins of multilateralism. International Organization56(3): 575–607.
21.
HendersonN (1983) The Birth of NATO. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
22.
HoffmanAM (2002) A conceptualization of trust in international relations. European Journal of International Relations8(3): 375–401.
23.
IkenberryGJ (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
JacksonPT (2006) Civilizing the Enemy: German Reconstruction and the Invention of the West. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
25.
KaplanLS (1984) The United States and NATO: The Formative Years. Lexington, KT: University Press of Kentucky.
26.
KaplanLS (2007) NATO 1948: The Birth of the Transatlantic Alliance. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
27.
KelleyHHStahelskiAJ (1970) Social interaction basis of cooperators’ and competitors’ beliefs about others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology16(1): 66–91.
28.
KeohaneRO (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
KeohaneRO (1986) Reciprocity in international relations. International Organization40(1): 1–27.
30.
KnockTJ (1992) To End All Wars: Woodrow Wilson and the Quest for a New World Order. New York: Oxford University Press.
31.
KramerRMBrewerMBHannaBA (2004) Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In: KramerRMCookKS (eds) Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches, Vol. 7. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 357–389.
32.
KuhlmanDMMarshelloAF (1975) Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategy effects in prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology32(5): 922–931.
33.
KuhlmanDMWimberleyDL (1976) Expectations of choice behavior held by cooperators, competitors, and individualists across four classes of experimental games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology34(1): 69–81.
34.
KyddAH (2005) Trust and Mistrust in International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35.
LakeDA (1999) Entangling Relations: American Foreign Policy in its Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
36.
LarsonDW (1997) Anatomy of Mistrust: US–Soviet Relations during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
37.
LiebrandWBGJansenRWTLRijkenVM. (1986) Might over morality: Social values and the perception of other players in experimental games. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology22: 203–215.
38.
McClintockCGLiebrandWB (1988) Role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation, and another’s strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55(3): 396–409.
39.
MercerJ (2005) Rationality and psychology in international politics. International Organization59(1): 77–106.
40.
MessickDMKramerRM (2001) Trust as a form of shallow morality. In: CookKS (ed.) Trust in Society, Vol. 2. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 89–118.
41.
MiscambleWD (1992) George F. Kennan and the Making of American Foreign Policy, 1947–1950. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
42.
MontenJ (2005) The roots of the Bush doctrine: Power, nationalism, and democracy promotion in US strategy. International Security29(4): 112–156.
43.
Papers of Woodrow Wilson. Edited by Arthur Link. Princeton University Press. 1966
44.
PatrickS (2009) The Best Laid Plans: The Origins of American Multilateralism and the Dawn of the Cold War. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
45.
PilisukMSkolnickP (1968) Inducing trust: A test of the Osgood proposal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology8(2): 121–133.
46.
PutnamRD (1993) Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47.
ReidE (1977) Time of Fear and Hope: The Making of the North Atlantic Treaty, 1947–1949. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
48.
Risse-KappenT (1995) Cooperation among Democracies: The European Influence on US Foreign Policy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
49.
RotterJB (1980) Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist35(1): 1–7.
50.
RuggieJG (1992) Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization46(3): 561–598.
51.
SnyderGH (1984) The security dilemma in alliance politics. World Politics36(4): 461–495.
52.
SnyderJL (1991) Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53.
StoneRA (1970) The Irreconcilables: The Fight against the League of Nations. Lexington, KT: University Press of Kentucky.
54.
SztompkaP (1999) Trust: A Sociological Theory. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
55.
TaftRA (1951) A Foreign Policy for Americans, 1st edn. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
56.
TaftRA (1997) The Papers of Robert A. Taft. Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
57.
TylerTR (2001) Why do people rely on others? Social identity and social aspects of trust. In: CookKS (ed.) Trust in Society, Vol. 2. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 285–306.
58.
TylerTRDegoeyP (2004) Trust in organizational authorites: The influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. In: KramerRMCookKS (eds) Trust in Organizations, Vol. 7. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 331–356.
59.
US Congress. (Various years) Congressional Record. Washington, D.C.: G. P. O.
60.
UslanerEM (2002) The Moral Foundations of Trust. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
61.
US Senate (1973) The Vandenberg Resolution and the North Atlantic Treaty. Hearings, Eightieth Congress, second session on S. Res. 239. Washington, DC: GPO.
62.
Van LangePAMKuhlmanDM (1994) Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology67(1): 126–141.
63.
YamagishiTYamagishiM (1994) Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion18(2): 129–166.
