This article argues that European Union Studies (EUS) provides a useful resource for
scholars engaged in the rethinking of international relations in the era of an
emerging global polity which has been neglected for reasons of what might be called
discipline blindness. More precisely, my claim is that EUS can help IR scholars ask
new and useful questions about the nature, development and functioning of the
emerging global polity. This is because EUS has already drawn on, and adapted,
comparative politics to produce a significant body of work which can act as a
transmission belt for ideas, concepts and approaches between the study of
‘domestic politics’ and the study of ‘international
relations’, and thus begin to show IR scholars how these tools can be
adapted and used to study politics in post- and transnational contexts.
Archer, C.
(2001) International Organizations (3rd edn).
London: Routledge
.
2.
Armstrong, K. and J. Shaw (eds) (1998)
‘Integrating Law’
, Journal of Common Market Studies36(2) (Special Issue).
3.
Ashworth, L.
(2002)
‘Did the Realist-Idealist Great Debate Really Happen? A
Revisionist History of International Relations’
, International Relations16(1):
33-51
.
4.
Bache, I.
and
M. Flinders
(eds) (2004) Multi-level Governance.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
5.
Bellamy, R.
and
D. Castiglione
(2000)
‘Legitimizing the Euro-“Polity” and its
“Regime”—The Normative Turn in EU Studies’
, European Journal of Political Theory2(1):
7-34
.
6.
Bhagwati, J.
(2004) In Defense of Globalization.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
7.
Bourne, A.
and
M. Cini
(2006, forthcoming) ‘Introduction: Defining
Boundaries and Identifying Trends in European Union Studies’,
in
M. Cini
and
A. Bourne
(eds.) Palgrave Guide to EU Studies.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
8.
Brown, C.
(2001) Understanding International Relations (2nd
edn).
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
9.
Burchill, S.
(1996) ‘Introduction’, in S.
Burchill and A. Linklater Theories of International Relations, pp.
1-27.
Basingstoke: Macmillan
.
10.
Buzan, B.
(2001)
‘The English School: An Underexploited Resource in IR’
, Review of International Studies27:
471-488
.
11.
Cafruny, A.
and
M. Ryner
(eds) (2003) A Ruined Fortress? Neoliberal Hegemony and
Transformation in Europe.
Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield
.
12.
Calhoun, C.
(2003)
‘European Studies: Always Already There and Still in Formation’
, Comparative European Politics1(1):
5-20
.
13.
Caporaso, J.
(1997)
‘Across the Great Divide: Integrating Comparative and
International Politics’
, International Studies Quarterly41:
563-592
.
14.
Carlsnaes, W.
,
T. Risse
and
B. Simmons
(eds) (2002) Handbook of International Relations.
London: Sage
.
15.
Christiansen, T.
and
S. Piattoni
(eds) (2003) Informal Governance in the European Union.
Aldershot: Edward Elgar
.
16.
Chryssochoou, D.
(1998) Democracy in the European Union.
London: Tauris
.
17.
Cini, M.
(2006, forthcoming)
‘The “State of the Art” in EU Studies: From
Politics to Interdisciplinarity (and Back Again?)’
, Politics.
18.
Cowles, M.G.
(2003)
‘Non-state Actors and False Dichotomies: Reviewing IR/IPE
Approaches to European Integration’
, Journal of European Public Policy10(1):
102-120
.
19.
Cowles, M.G.
,
J. Caporaso
and
T. Risse
(eds) (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and
Domestic Change.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
20.
Cram, L.
(1997) Policy-making in the EU: Conceptual Lenses and the
Integration Process.
London: Routledge
.
21.
Dinan, D.
(2004) Europe Recast: A History of European Union.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
22.
Diez, T.
and
R. Whitman
(2002)
‘Analysing European Integration: Reflecting on the English
School—Scenarios for an Encounter’
, Journal of Common Market Studies40(1):
43-67
.
23.
Elman, C.
and
M. Fendius Elman
(eds) (2003) Progress in International Relations Theory:
Appraising the Field.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
24.
Falk, R.
,
L.E.J. Ruiz
and
R.B.J. Walker
(eds) (2002) Reframing the International: Law, Culture,
Politics.
London: Routledge
.
25.
Forsyth, M.
(1981) Unions of States—The Theory and Practice of
Confederation.
Leicester: Leicester University Press
.
26.
Gourevitch, P.
(2002) ‘Domestic Politics and International
Relations’, in
W. Carlsnaes
,
T. Risse
and
B. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
309-328.
London: Sage
.
27.
Greenwood, J.
(1997) Representing Interests in the European Union.
Basingstoke: Macmillan
.
28.
Greenwood, J.
and
Aspinwall, M.
(eds) (1998) Collective Action in the European Union:
Interests and the New Politics of Associability.
London: Routledge
.
29.
Grieco, J.
(1995)
‘The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union and the
Neo-realist Research Programme’
, Review of International Studies21(January):
21-40
.
30.
Grugel, J.
(2003)
‘Democratisation Studies Globalisation: The Coming of Age of a Paradigm’
, British Journal of Politics and International Relations5(2):
258-283
.
31.
Haas, E.
(1964) Beyond the Nation State.
Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press
.
32.
Haltern, U.
(2004) ‘Integration Through
Law’, in
A. Wiener
and
T. Diez
(eds) European Integration Theory, pp.
177-196.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
33.
Hettne, B.
(2003) ‘The New Regionalism
Revisited’, in
F. Söderbaum
and
T. Shaw
(eds) Theories of New Regionalism: A Palgrave Reader, pp.
22-42.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
34.
Higgott, R.
and
M. Ougaard
(2002) ‘Introduction: Beyond System and Society
- Towards a Global Polity?’, in
R. Higgott
and
M. Ougaard
(eds) Towards a Global Polity, pp. 1-19.
London: Routledge
.
35.
Hix, S.
(1994)
‘The Study of the European Community: The Challenge to
Comparative Politics’
, West European Politics17(1):
1-30
.
36.
Hix, S.
(1998)
‘The Study of the European Union II: The “New
Governance” Agenda and its Rival’
, Journal of European Public Policy5(1):
38-65
.
37.
Hix, S.
(2005) The Political System of the European Union
(2nd edn).
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
38.
Hoffmann, S.
(1982)
‘Reflections on the Nation State in Western Europe Today’
, Journal of Common Market Studies
(September-December):
21-37
.
39.
Hooghe, L.
(1996) Cohesion Policy and European Integration.
Oxford: Clarendon
.
40.
Hooghe, L.
and
G. Marks
(2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration.
Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield
.
41.
Hurrell, A.
(1995)
‘Explaining the Resurgence of Regionalism in World Politics’
, Review of International Studies21:
331-358
.
42.
Hurrell, A.
and
A. Menon
(1996)
‘Politics Like Any Other? Comparative Politics, International
Relations and the Study of the EU’
, West European Politics19(2):
386-442
.
43.
Jachtenfuchs, M.
(2001)
‘The Governance Approach to European Integration’
, Journal of Common Market Studies39(2):
245-264
.
44.
Jachtenfuchs, M.
(2002)
‘Deepening and Widening Integration Theory’
, Journal of European Public Policy9(4):
650-657
.
45.
Jeffery, C.
(ed.) (1997) The Regional Dimension of the European Union:
Towards a Third Level in Europe?London: Frank Cass
.
46.
Joerges, C.
(1996)
‘Taking the Law Seriously: On Political Science and the Role of
Law in the Process of European Integration’
, European Law Journal2(2):
105-135
.
47.
Jones, E.
(2003)
‘Idiosyncrasy and Integration: Suggestions from Comparative
Political Economy’
, Journal of European Public Policy10(1):
140-158
.
48.
Jordan, A.
(1997)
‘Overcoming the Divide Between Comparative Politics and
International Relations Approaches to the EC: What Role for Post-Decisional Politics?’
, West European Politics20(4):
43-70
.
49.
Josselin, D.
and
W. Wallace
(eds) (2001) Non-State Actors in World Politics.
Basingstoke: Palgrave
.
50.
Kelstrup, M.
and
M. Williams
(2000) ‘Introduction: Integration and the
Politics of Community in the New Europe’, in
M. Kelstrup
and
M. Williams
(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European
Integration, pp. 1-13.
London: Routledge
.
51.
Keohane, R.
and
S. Hoffmann
(eds) (1991) The New European Community: Decision-making and
Institutional Change.
Oxford: Westview
.
52.
Keohane, R.
and
L. Martin
(2003) ‘Institutional Theory as a Research
Program’, in
C. Elman
and
M. Fendius Elman
(eds) Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the
Field, pp. 71-107.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
53.
Koenig-Archibugi, M.
(2002) ‘Mapping Global
Governance’, in
D. Held
and
A. McGrew
(eds) Governing Globalization: Power, Authority and Global
Governance, pp. 46-69.
Cambridge: Polity
.
54.
Kohler-Koch, B.
and
R. Eising
(eds) (1999) The Transformation of Governance in the European
Union.
London: Routledge
.
55.
Kuhn, T.
(1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd
edn).
Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
.
Le Galès, P.
and
C. Lequesne
(eds) (1998) Regions in Europe.
London: Routledge
.
58.
Lord, C.
(1998) Democracy in the European Union.
Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press
.
59.
Manners, I.
(2003)
‘Europaian Studies’
, Journal of Contemporary European Studies11(1):
67-83
.
60.
Manners, I.
and
R. Whitman
(2003)
‘The “Difference Engine”: Constructing and
Representing the International Identity of the European Union’
, Journal of European Public Policy10(3):
380-404
.
61.
Marks, G.
and
L. Hooghe
(2004) ‘Contrasting Visions of Multi-level
Governance’, in
I. Bache
and
M. Flinders
(eds) Multi-level Governance, pp. 15-30.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
62.
Marks, G.
,
L. Hooghe
and
K. Blank
(1996)
‘European Integration from the 1980s: State-centric versus
Multi-level Governance’
, Journal of Common Market Studies34(3):
341-378
.
63.
Mearsheimer, J.
(1990)
‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War’
, International Security15(1):
5-56
.
64.
Moravcsik, A.
(1999) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power
from Messina to Maastricht.
London: UCL Press
.
65.
Mulligan, S.
(2004)
‘Questioning (the Question of) Legitimacy in IR: A Reply to Jens Steffek’
, European Journal of International Relations10(3):
475-484
.
66.
Øhrgaard, J.
(1997)
‘Less than Supranational, More than Intergovernmental: European
Political Cooperation and the Dynamics of Intergovernmental Integration’
, Millennium26(1):
1-29
.
67.
Olsen, J.
(2003) ‘Europeanization’, in
M. Cini
(ed.) European Union Politics, pp. 333-348.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
68.
Peterson, J.
(1995)
‘Decision-making in the European Union: Towards a Framework for Analysis’
, Journal of European Public Policy2(1):
69-93
.
69.
Peterson, J.
and
M. Shackleton
(eds) (2002) The Institutions of the European Union.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
70.
Pollack, M.
(2001)
‘International Relations Theory and European Integration’
, Journal of Common Market Studies39(2):
221-244
.
71.
Rausitalia, K.
and
A.-M. Slaughter
(2002) ‘International Law, International
Relations and Compliance’, in
W. Carlsnaes
,
T. Risse
and
B. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
538-558.
London: Sage
.
72.
Rhodes, R.A.W.
(1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance,
Reflexivity and Accountability.
Buckingham: Open University Press
.
73.
Richardson, J.
(ed.) (2006) European Union Power and Policy-making
(3rd edn).
London: Routledge
.
74.
Risse-Kappen, T.
(1996)
‘Explaining the Nature of the Beast: International Relations
Theory and Comparative Policy Analysis Meet the EU’
, Journal of Common Market Studies34(1):
53-90
.
75.
Rosamond, B.
(2000) Theories of European Integration.
Basingstoke: Macmillan
.
76.
Rosamond, B.
(2005a)
‘Globalization, The Ambivalence of European Integration, and the
Possibilities for a Post-disciplinary EU Studies’
, Innovation18(1):
23-43
.
77.
Rosamond, B.
(2005b)
‘The Uniting of Europe and the Foundation of EU Studies:
Revisiting the Neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’
, Journal of European Public Policy12(2):
1-18
.
78.
Sandholtz, W.
and
A. Stone Sweet
(eds) (1998) European Integration and Supranational
Governance.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
79.
Schmidt, B.
(2002) ‘On the History and Historiography of
International Relations’, in
W. Carlsnaes
,
T. Risse
and
B. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
3-22.
London: Sage
.
80.
Schmitter, P.
(1996) ‘Imagining the Future of the Euro-Polity
with the Help of New Concepts’, in G. Marks, F. Scharpf, P.
Schmitter and W. Streeck Governance in the European Union, pp.
121-150.
London: Sage
.
81.
Schneider, G.
(2000)
‘European Union Politics Editorial Statement’
, European Union Politics1(1):
5-7
.
82.
Simmons, B.
and
L. Martin
(2002) ‘International Organizations and
Institutions’, in
W. Carlsnaes
,
T. Risse
and
B. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
192-211.
London: Sage
.
83.
Smith, S.
(2000) ‘International Theory and European
Integration’, in
M. Kelstrup
and
M. Williams
(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European
Integration, pp. 33-56.
London: Routledge
.
84.
Smith, S.
and
Baylis, J.
(2005) ‘Introduction’, in
J. Baylis
and
S. Smith
(eds) The Globalization of World Politics (3rd edn), pp.
1-14.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
85.
Steffek, J.
(2004)
‘Why IR Needs Legitimacy: A Rejoinder’
, European Journal of International Relations10(3):
485-490
.
86.
Telò, M.
(ed.) (2001) European Union and New Regionalism: Regional
Actors and Global Governance in a Post-hegemonic Era.
Aldershot: Ashgate
.
87.
Taylor, T.
(1978) ‘Introduction: The Nature of
International Relations’, in
T. Taylor
(ed.) Approaches and Theory in International Relations, pp.
1-18.
London: Longman
.
88.
Verdun, A.
(2003)
‘An American/European Divide in European Integration Studies:
Bridging the Gap with International Political Economy’
, Journal of European Public Policy10(1):
84-101
.
89.
Wæver, O.
(2000) ‘The EU as a Security Actor: Reflections
from a Pessimistic Constructivist on Post-Sovereign Security
Orders’, in
M. Kelstrup
and
M. Williams
(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European
Integration, pp. 250-294.
London: Routledge
.
90.
Wæver, O.
(2004) ‘Discursive
Approaches’, in
A. Wiener
and
T. Diez
(eds) European Integration Theory, pp.
197-215.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
91.
Walker, R.B.J.
(2000) ‘Europe is Not Where it is Supposed To
Be’, in
M. Kelstrup
and
M. Williams
(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European
Integration, pp. 14-32.
London: Routledge
.
92.
Warleigh, A.
(2000)
‘History Repeating? Framework Theory and Europe’s
Multilevel Confederation’
, Journal of European Integration22:
173-200
.
93.
Warleigh, A.
(2002) Flexible Integration: Which Model for the European Union?London: Continuum
.
94.
Warleigh, A.
(2003) Democracy in the European Union: Theory, Practice and
Reform.
London: Sage
.
95.
Warleigh, A.
(2004)
‘In Defence of Intra-Disciplinarity: “European
Studies”, the “New Regionalism”, and the Issue
of Democratisation’
, Cambridge Review of International Affairs17(2):
301-318
.
96.
Warleigh, A.
and
J. Fairbrass
(eds) (2003) Influence and Interests in the European Union:
The New Politics of Persuasion and Advocacy.
London: Europa
.
97.
Weber, C.
(2001) International Relations Theory: A Critical
Introduction.
London: Routledge
.
98.
Weiler, J.
(1991)
‘The Transformation of Europe’
, Yale Law Journal100(8):
2405-2483
.
99.
Wessels, W.
(1997)
‘An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on
Integration Processes’
, Journal of Common Market Studies35(2):
267-299
.
100.
Wessels, W.
,
A. Maurer
and
J. Mittag
(eds) (2003) Fifteen into One? The European Union and its
Member States.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
101.
Wiener, A.
(1998) European Citizenship Practice: Building Institutions
of a Non-State.
Oxford: Westview
.
