In 1971, the United States and India — the world’s two largest
democracies — almost went to war in a ‘near-miss’ at
odds with the hypothesis that democracies do not fight one another. In this article,
I reformulate the democratic peace hypothesis by subsuming it under a broadened
constructivist analysis, one that recognizes that institutional qualities do not
‘speak for themselves’ but rather that struggles over the
meaning of democracy can engender conflict. I then argue that differences regarding
the meaning of democracy shaped post-World War II US perceptions of the South Asian
distribution of power, explaining shifts from periods of Democratic friendship to
Republican enmity toward India, with the latter most clearly manifested in the 1971
crisis. I conclude by emphasizing the merit of a constructivist theory of democratic
interactions in explaining cooperation and conflict.
Adhikari, Gautam
(2004)
‘India and America: Estranged No More’
, Current History103(671):
158-165
.
2.
Ambrose, Stephen E.
(1989) Nixon: Volume Two: The Triumph of a Politician,
1962-1972.
New York: Simon and Schuster
.
3.
Brown, Michael E.
,
Sean M. Lynn-Jones
and
Steven E. Miller
(1996) Debating the Democratic Peace.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
4.
Bundy, William
(1998) A Tangled Web: The Making of Foreign Policy in the
Nixon Presidency.
New York: Hill and Wang
.
5.
Bush, George W.
(2003) ‘Remarks by the President in Address to the
Nation: President Says Saddam Hussein Must Leave Iraq Within 48
Hours’, 17 March 2003
<http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/03/iraq/20030317-7.html>
(14 October 2004)
6.
Drury, Allen
(1959) Advise and Consent.
New York: Doubleday
.
7.
Farber, Henry
and
Joanne Gowa
(1995)
‘Polities and Peace’
, International Security20(2):
123-146
8.
Galbraith, John Kenneth
(1981) A Life in Our Times.
Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin
.
9.
Garthoff, Raymond L.
(1985) Détente and Confrontation: American-Soviet
Relations from Nixon to Reagan.
Washington, DC: Brookings
.
10.
Gowa, Joanne
(1999) Bullets and Ballots: The Elusive Democratic
Peace.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
11.
Harrison, Selig S.
,
Paul H. Kreisberg
and
Dennis Kux
(1999) India and Pakistan.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
12.
Hersh, Seymour
(1983) The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White
House.
New York: Summit Books
.
13.
Kant, Immanuel
(1970) Kant’s Political Writings.
Hans Reiss
(ed.), H.B. Nisbet (trans.)
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
14.
Kissinger, Henry
(1979) White House Years.
Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co
.
15.
Kux, Dennis
(1992) India and the United States: Estranged Democracies,
1941-1991.
Washington, DC: National Defense University Press
.
16.
Kux, Dennis
(2002)
‘India’s Fine Balance’
, Foreign Affairs81(3):
93-106
.
17.
Layne, Christopher
(1994)
‘Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace’
, International Security19(2):
5-49
.
18.
Lebow, Richard Ned
(1981) Between Peace and War.
Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
19.
McMahon, Robert J.
(1994) The Cold War on the Periphery: The United States,
India and Pakistan.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
20.
Maoz, Zeev
(1997)
‘The Controversy Over Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or
Cracks in the Wall?’International Security22(1):
162-198
.
21.
Mearsheimer, John
(1990)
‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War’
, International Security15(1):
5-6
.
22.
Morgenthau, Hans
(1948/1973) Politics Among Nations.
New York: Knopf
.
23.
Nayar, Baldev Raj
and
T.V. Paul
(2003) India in the World Order: Searching for Major-Power
Status.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
24.
New York Times (1992)
‘Excerpts From Pentagon’s Plan: “Prevent the
Re-Emergence of a New Rival”’
, 8 March:
14
.
25.
Nixon, Richard
(1978) RN: The Memoirs of Richard Nixon.
New York: Touchstone
.
26.
Nozick, Robert
(1974) Anarchy, the State, and Utopia.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell
.
27.
Onuf, Nicholas
(1989) World of Our Making.
Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
.
28.
Oren, Ido
(1995)
‘The Subjectivity of the “Democratic” Peace:
Changing US Perceptions of Imperial Germany’
, International Security20(2):
147-184
.
29.
Powell, Colin
(2004)
‘A Strategy of Partnerships’
, Foreign Affairs83(1),
22-35
.
30.
Rawls, John
(1971) A Theory of Justice.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
.
31.
Ray, James Lee
(1995) Democracy and International Conflict.
Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
.
32.
Reeves, Richard
(2001) President Nixon: Alone in the White House.
New York: Simon and Schuster
.
33.
Risse, Thomas
(2000)
‘“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative
Action in World Politics’
, International Organization54(1):
1-39
.
34.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1995)
‘Democratic Peace — Warlike Democracies? A Social
Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument’
, European Journal of International Relations1(4):
491-517
.
35.
Russett, Bruce
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
36.
Sisson, Richard
and
Leo E. Rose
(1990) War and Secession: Pakistan, India and the Creation of
Bangladesh.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
37.
Spiro, David E.
(1994)
‘The Insignificance of the Democratic Peace’
, International Security19(2):
50-86
.
38.
Smith, Craig S.
(2003)
‘Threats and Responses: Chirac Scolding Angers Nations That Back
the US’
, New York Times, 19 February:
A1
.
39.
Taylor, Charles
(1979) ‘Interpretation and the Science of
Man’, in
Paul Rabinow
and
William M. Sullivan
(eds) Interpretive Social Science: A Reader, pp.
25-71.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
40.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1979) Theory of International Politics.
New York: McGraw-Hill
.
41.
Wendt, Alexander
(1992)
‘Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of
Power Politics’
, International Organization46(2):
391-425
.
42.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
43.
Widmaier, Wesley
(2004)
‘The Social Construction of the “Impossible
Trinity”: The Intersubjective Bases of Monetary Cooperation’
, International Studies Quarterly48:
433-453
.
