The theory that democratic states do not go to war with one another depends upon the claim that such states can recognize each other as democracies and act pacifically in accordance with this recognition. This article argues that analyses of the democratic peace and security communities can benefit from a fuller and more critical engagement with the thinking of Immanuel Kant. Kantian liberalism involves subtle yet powerful processes of identity construction, and the processes of mutual recognition with which these identities are intertwined play essential constitutive and disciplining roles in the development of political relations. These processes of recognition are not merely sociological puzzles, but rather overtly political practices that both entail and enable the exercise of considerable power. The social construction of democratic security communities builds upon these liberal structures of identity and discipline, a situation demonstrated in the case of NATO.
Adler, Emanuel
(1997) `Imagined (Security) Communities: Cognitive Regions in IR', Millennium: Journal of International Studies26(2): 249-277.
2.
Adler, Emanuel
and Michael Barnett (1998) Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Barkawi, Tarak
and Mark Laffey (1999) `The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and Globalization', European Journal of International Relations5(4): 403-434.
4.
Bartelson, Jens
(1995) `A Trial of Judgement: A Note on Kant and the Paradoxes of Internationalism', International Studies Quarterly39(2): 255-279.
5.
Bellamy, Richard
(1992) Liberalism and Modern Society. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
6.
Buzan, Barry
, Ole Wæver and Jaap deWilde (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CA: Lynne Reinner.
7.
Clinton, William
(1993) `Confronting the Challenges of a Broader World', US Department of State Bureau of Public Affairs, Dispatch Vol. 4, No. 39 (September).
8.
Doyle, Michael
(1983) `Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part I', Philosophy and Public Affairs12(3): 205-235.
9.
Doyle, Michael
(1997) Ways of War and Peace. New York: Norton.
10.
Dunn, John
(1990) Interpreting Political Responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
Economist (1995) `Democracies and War: The Politics of Peace', 1 April: 17-18.
12.
Enzensberger, Hans Magnus
(1994) Civil Wars: From LA to Bosnia, trans. by P. Spence and M. Chalmers. London: Granta.
13.
Farber, Henry S.
and Joanne Gowa (1995) `Polities and Peace', International Security20(2): 123-146.
14.
Fendius Elman, Miriam
(2000) `Unpacking Democracy: Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Theories of the Democratic Peace', Security Studies9(4): 91-126.
15.
Flathman, Richard
(1992) Willfull Liberalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
16.
Foucault, Michel
(1977) Discipline and Punish, trans. by A. Sheridan. London: Allen Lane.
17.
Foucault, Michel
(1985) The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Uses of Pleasure, trans. by R. Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.
18.
Germain, Randall
and Michael Kenny (1998) `International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians', Review of International Studies24(1): 3-21.
19.
Gheciu, Alexandra
(2000) `The Kosovo Crisis: A Study of Civilizing Practices in Post-Cold War Europe', paper presented at the conference on Strategies and (In)Security, Center for International and Security Studies, York University, Canada, 17-18 October.
20.
Goldgeiger, James
(1998) `NATO Expansion: The Anatomy of a Decision', Washington Quarterly21(1): 85-102.
21.
Hindess, Barry
(1996) Discourses of Power: Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford: Blackwell.
22.
Hirschman, Albert O.
(1977) The Passions and the Interests. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
23.
Holmes, Stephen
(1995) Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Honig, Bonnie
(1993) Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
25.
Huysmans, Jef
(1998) `The Question of the Limit: Desecuritization and the Aesthetics of Horror in Political Realism', Millennium: Journal of International Studies27(3): 569-589.
26.
Ignatieff, Michael
(1998) The Warrior's Honor. London: Penguin Books.
27.
Kahl, Colin H.
(1998/99) `Constructing a Separate Peace: Constructivism, Collective Liberal Identity, and Democratic Peace', Security Studies8(2/3): 94-144.
28.
Kant, Immanuel
(1970) `Perpetual Peace', in Kant's Political Writings, ed. by H. Reiss. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
Kant, Immanuel
(1998a) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. and ed. by M. Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Kant, Immanuel
(1998b) Religion Within the Limits of Mere Reason and Other Writings, trans. and ed. by A. Wood and G. Di Giovanni. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Kosseleck, Reinhard
(1988) Critique and Crisis: The Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Oxford: Berg.
32.
Laffey, Mark
and Jutta Weldes (1998) `Beyond Belief: Ideas and Symbolic Technologies in the Study of International Relations', European Journal of International Relations3(2): 193-237.
33.
Lake, David
(1992) `Powerful Pacifists: Democratic States and War', American Political Science Review86(1): 24-37.
34.
Latham, Robert
(1997) The Liberal Moment. New York: Columbia University Press.
35.
Layne, Christopher
(1994) `Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace', International Security19(2): 5-49.
36.
Macpherson, C.B.
(1962) The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
Maoz, Zeev
(1997) `The Controversy over the Democratic Peace: Rearguard Action or Cracks in the Wall?', International Security22(1): 162-198.
38.
Miller, James
(1994) The Passion of Michel Foucault. London: Flamingo/Harper-Collins.
39.
Morgenthau, Hans
(1946) Scientific Man versus Power Politics. New York: Norton.
40.
Nietzsche, Friedrich
(1886/1968) Beyond Good and Evil, in Walter Kaufmann (ed.) Basic Writings of Nietzsche. New York: Modern Library.
41.
Oestreich, G.
(1982) Neostoicism and the Early Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42.
Oren, Ido
(1995) `The Subjectivity of the “Democratic” Peace', International Security20(2): 147-184.
43.
Owen, John
(1994) `How Liberalism Produces the Democratic Peace', International Security19(2): 87-125.
44.
Polanyi, Karl
(1946) The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.
45.
Ringmar, Erik
(1996) Identity, Interests and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1995) `Democratic Peace — Warlike Democracies? A Social Constructivist Interpretation of the Liberal Argument', European Journal of International Relations1(4): 491-517.
47.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1996) `Collective Identity in a Democratic Security Community: The Case of NATO', in Peter Katzenstein (ed.) Culture and National Security. New York: Columbia University Press.
48.
Ruggie, John Gerrard
(1982) `International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order', International Organization36(2): 379-415.
49.
Russett, Bruce
(1993) Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
50.
Russett, Bruce
(1998) `A NeoKantian Perspective: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations in Building Security Communities', in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds) Security Communities, pp. 369-394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51.
Scheuerman, William E.
(1994) Between the Norm and the Exception: The Frankfurt School and the Rule of Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52.
Schiera, Pierangelo
(1995) `Legitimacy, Discipline, and Institutions: Three Necessary Conditions for the Birth of the Modern State', Journal of Modern History67, suppl.: S11-S33.
53.
Solana, Javier
(1999) NATO as a Community of ValuesManfred Worner Memorial Lecture, Berlin, Germany, 2 June. http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/1999/s990602a.htm
54.
Wæver, Ole
(1995) `Securitization and Desecuritization' in Ronnie Lipschutz (ed) On Security, pp. 46-86. New York: Columbia University Press.
55.
Wæver, Ole
(1998) `Insecurity, security, and asecurity in the West European non-war community' in Emanuel Adler and Michael Barnett (eds) Security Communities, pp. 69-118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Wæver, Ole
(2000) `The EU as a Security Actor' in Morten Kelstrup and Michael C. Williams (eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration, pp. 250-294. London: Routledge.
57.
Williams, Michael C.
(1992) Reason and Realpolitik: Kant's `Critique of International Politics', Canadian Journal of Political Science25(1): 99-119.
58.
Williams, Michael C.
and Iver B. Neumann (2000) `From Alliance to Security Community: NATO, Russia, and the Power of Identity', Millennium: Journal of International Studies29(2):357-387.
59.
Zizek, S.
(1991) For they know not what they do: enjoyment as a political factor. London: Verso.
