The aim of this article is to demonstrate how a relational concept of power can
benefit Foreign Policy Analysis (FPA). It begins by drawing attention to the fact
that Japan’s foreign policy has been portrayed rather enigmatically in
terms of power, and by arguing that such an enigma stems from the fact that FPA has
borrowed the concept of power of much International Relations (IR) theory, i.e. one
that puts power on a par with capability. With a point of departure in Steven
Lukes’ relational concept of power, the article then conceptualizes an
alternative perspective. By applying the ensuing ‘relational power
analysis’ to two ‘significant’ issues in
Japan’s China policy, namely the negotiations for bilateral investment
protection and interaction over the disputed Pinnacle (Senkaku or
Diaoyu) Islands, the article demonstrates that Japan’s foreign
policy can be portrayed more intelligibly in terms of power, and thereby also how
power could be treated in FPA in the first place.
Li Guojiang, Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Contemporary History,
Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS), Beijing, 3 April 2001.
2.
Wang Jisi, Director, Institute of American Studies, CASS, Beijing, 5 April 2001.
3.
Yang Bojiang, Research Professor and Deputy Director Northeast Asian Studies
Division, Chinese Institute of Contemporary International Relations (CICIR),
Beijing, 9 April 2001.
4.
Zhang Yunling, Director, Institute of Asia-Pacific studies and Institute of
Japanese Studies, CASS, Beijing, 2 April 2001.
5.
An official at the China Section of the Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
MOFA, Tokyo, 22 November 2000.
6.
A former MOFA official with long experience from China and Taiwan, Tokyo, 7
November 2000.
7.
A former ambassador and official at the Japanese embassy in Beijing, Tokyo,
22 May 2002.
8.
A director at the Japan-China Investment Promotion Organization, Tokyo, 16
November 2000.
9.
The director general of the Japan-China Economic Association, Tokyo, 20
November 2000.
10.
A MOFA top-official central to Japan’s China policy in 1992, Tokyo,
1 December 2000.
11.
A MOFA director, Japanese participant in the negotiations for a Japan-China
Bilateral Investment Treaty (JCBIT) in 1988, Tokyo, (1) 5 December 2000, (2) 6
December 2000, and (3) 21 May 2002.
12.
A former Japanese Ministry of International Trade and Industry (MITI)
official in charge of Northeast Asian affairs, Tokyo, (1) 6 December 2000 and (2) 29
May 2002.
13.
A former MITI official in charge of Northeast Asian affairs, Japanese
participant in the negotiations for a JCBIT in 1988, Tokyo, (1) 11 December 2000 and
(2) 23 May 2002.
14.
A former ambassador and deputy minister of foreign affairs with long
experience at the MOFA’s Treaties Bureau, Tokyo, 13 December 2000.
15.
An ambassador central to Japan’s China-policy, Japanese participant
in the negotiations for a JCBIT in 1988, Beijing, 21 March 2001.
16.
A former Ministry of Finance (MOF) official and Japanese participant in the
negotiations for a JCBIT in 1988, Tokyo, 3 June 2002.
17.
A former ambassador and vice-minister of foreign affairs with long experience
at MOFA’s Treaties Bureau, Tokyo, 4 June 2002.
18.
A former ambassador central to Japan’s China-policy, Japanese
participant in the negotiations for a JCBIT in 1988, Tokyo, 4 June 2002.
19.
A Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) official, Beijing, 15 March 2001.
20.
A senior research fellow at China Institute of International Relations
(CIIR), and former MFA official, Beijing, 16 March 2001.
21.
A MFA official central to PRC’s Japanese policy, Beijing, 19 March 2001.
22.
A People’s Liberation Army (PLA) colonel and associate professor at
the National Defence University, Beijing, 19 March 2001.
23.
Adler, Emanuel
(2002) ‘Constructivism and International
Relations’, in
Walter Carlsnaes
,
Thomas Risse
and
Beth Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
95-118.
London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE Publications
.
24.
Agreement between Japan and the People’s Republic of China
Concerning the Encouragement and Reciprocal Protection of Investment.
25.
Arase, David
(1993)
‘Japanese Policy Toward Democracy and Human Rights in Asia’
, Asian Survey33(10):
935-952
.
26.
Reprinted in Scott, 1994:
85-94
.
27.
Reprinted in Scott, 1994:
95-110
.
28.
Baldwin, David A.
(1985) Economic Statecraft.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
29.
Baldwin, David A.
(1993) ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World
Politics’, in
David A. Baldwin
(ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, pp.
3-28.
New York, NY: Columbia University Press
.
30.
Baldwin, David A.
(1999/2000)
‘The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice’
, International Security24(3):
80-107
.
31.
Baldwin, David A.
(2002) ‘Power and International
Relations’, in
Walter Carlsnaes
,
Thomas Risse
and
Beth Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
177-191.
London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE Publications
.
32.
Ball, Terence
(1988) Transforming Political Discourse: Political Theory and
Critical Conceptual History.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell
.
33.
Bates, Laurence W.
(1988)
‘Protecting Foreign Investments in China: The Sino-Japanese
Bilateral Investment Treaty: Comparison with Earlier BITs and U.S. Positions’
, East Asian Executive Reports (December):
9-14
.
34.
Reprinted in Scott, 1994:
283-307
.
35.
Berger, Thomas U.
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security
in Germany and Japan’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identities in World
Politics, pp. 317-356.
New York, NY: Columbia University Press
.
36.
Bergström, Göran
and
Kristina Boréus
(2000) Textens mening och makt: Metodbok i
samhällsvetenskaplig textanalys (The Meaning and Power of the Text:
Methods in Social Scientific Text Analysis).
Lund: Studentlitteratur
.
37.
Blanchard, Jean-Marc F.
(2000)
‘The U.S. Role in the Sino-Japanese Dispute over the Diaoyu
(Senkaku) Islands 1945-1971’
, China Quarterly, no. 161:
95-123
.
38.
Reprinted in Scott, 1994:
269-277
.
39.
Carlsnaes, Walter
(2002) ‘Foreign Policy,’ in
Walter Carlsnaes
,
Thomas Risse
and
Beth A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
331-349.
London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE Publications
.
40.
Charney, Jonathan I.
(1995)
‘Central East Asian Maritime Boundaries and the Law of the Sea’
, American Journal of International Law89(4):
724-749
.
41.
Charney, Jonathan I.
(1999)
‘Rocks that Cannot Sustain Habitation’
, American Journal of International Law93(4):
863-878
.
42.
Chen, Jian-An
(1992) ‘Japanese Firms with Direct Investments
in China and their Local Management’, in
Shojiro Tokunaga
(ed.) Japan’s Foreign Investment and Asian Economic
Interdependence: Production, Trade, and Financial Systems, pp.
257-271.
Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press
.
43.
Connolly, William E.
(1974, 2nd edn1983) The Terms of Political Discourse.
Oxford: Martin Robertson
.
44.
Reprinted in Scott, 1994:
288-309
.
45.
Reprinted in
Roderick Bell
,
David V. Edwards
and
R. Harrison Wagner
(eds) (1969) Political Power: A Reader in Theory and
Research, pp. 36-41.
New York: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan
.
46.
Defense Agency [Bōeichō] (16 October 2000)
Senkaku shotō ni tsuite (on the Pinnacle Islands).
47.
Deng, Liping
and
Akiyo Mukai
(1996)
‘Japan’s Official Development Assistance to China: A
Theoretical and Empirical Analysis’
, International Politics33(2):
163-176
.
48.
Diet-HC (House of Councilors) 101, Gaimu 4, 6 April 1984.
49.
Diet-HC 114, Gaimu 3, 11 April 1989.
50.
Diet-HR (House of Representatives) 101, Gaimu 5, 4 April 1984.
51.
Diet-HR 104, Gaimu 13, 14 May 1986.
52.
Diet-HR 123, Okinawa-Hoppô 4, 10 March 1992.
53.
Diet-HR 123, Yosan, 2 Bunkakai 2, 12 March 1992.
54.
Diet-HR 123, Okinawa-Hoppô 5, 12 March 1992.
55.
Downs, Erica Strecker
and
Phillip C. Saunders
(1998/99)
‘Legitimacy and the Limits of Nationalism: China and the Diaoyu Islands’
, International Security23(3):
114-146
.
56.
Drifte, Reinhard
(1996) Japan’s Foreign Policy in the 1990s: From
Economic Superpower to What Power?New York, NY: St Martin’s Press;
London: Macmillan Press
.
57.
Eckstein, Harry
(1975) ‘Case Study and Theory in Political
Science’, in
Fred E. Greenstein
and
Nelson W. Polsby
(eds) Handbook of Political Science 7, Strategies of Inquiry, pp.
79-129.
Reading, MA: Addison Wesley
.
58.
Elman, Colin
(1996)
‘Horses for Courses: Why Not Neorealist Theories of Foreign Policy?’Security Studies6 (1):
7-53
.
59.
Emmott, Bill
(1992)
‘The Economic Sources of Japan’s Foreign Policy’
, Survival, The IISS Quarterly34(2):
50-70
.
60.
Fearon, James
and
Alexander Wendt
(2002) ‘Rationalism v. Constructivism: A
Skeptical View’, in
Walter Carlsnaes
,
Thomas Risse
and
Beth A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
52-72.
London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: SAGE Publications
.
61.
Gaventa, John
(1980) Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebellion in
an Appalachian Valley.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
62.
Gaventa, John
(1987) ‘Makt och deltagande’
(‘Power and Participation’), in
Olof Petersson
(ed.) Maktbegreppet (The Concept of Power), pp.
27-56.
Stockholm: Carlssons
.
63.
George, Alexander L.
(1979) ‘Case Studies and Theory Development: The
Method of Structured, Focused Comparison’, in
Paul Gordon Lauren
(ed.) Diplomacy: New Approaches in History, Theory and Policy, pp.
43-68.
New York, NY: Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan
.
64.
George, Alexander L.
and
Timothy J. McKeown
(1985) ‘Case Studies and Theories of
Organizational Decision Making’, in
Lee S. Sproull
and
Patrick D. Lackey
(eds) Advances in Information Processing in Organizations, vol. 2,
pp. 21-58.
Greenwich and London: Jai Press
.
65.
Gill, Stephen
and
David Law
(1988) The Global Political Economy.
Brighton: Wheatsheaf
.
66.
Goldstein, Judith
and
Robert O. Keohane
(1993) ‘Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical
Framework’, in
Judith Goldstein
and
Robert O. Keohane
(eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political
Change, pp. 3-30.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
67.
Guzzini, Stefano
(2000) ‘The Use and Misuse of Power Analysis in
International Theory’, in
Ronen Palan
(ed.) Global Political Economy, pp. 53-66.
London and New York: Routledge
.
68.
Hadenius, Axel
(1983) ‘The Verification of
Motives’, Scandinavian Political Studies. New
Series 6, no. 2: 125-150.
69.
Hagström, Linus
(2005a) Japan’s China Policy: A Relational Power
Analysis.
London & New York: Routledge
.
70.
Hagström, Linus
(2005b)
‘Ubiquity of “Power” and the Advantage of
Terminological Pluralism: Japan’s Foreign Policy Discourse’
, Japanese Journal of Political Science6(2):
1-20
.
71.
Higure Takanori
(1989) ‘2. Nitchū kankei’
(‘2. The Japan-China Relationship’), in
Chūgoku kenkyūjo
(ed.) Chūgoku nenkan: 1989 nenpan (The China Yearbook: 1989
edition),pp. 78-82.
Tokyo: Chūgoku kenkyūjo
.
72.
Hiramatsu Shigeo
(1992a)
‘Chūgoku no ryōkaihō to Senkaku
shotō mondai (jō)’
(‘China’s Territorial Waters Law and the Pinnacle
Islands Problem (upper)
, Kokubō (The National Defense)41(9):
19-34
.
73.
Hiramatsu Shigeo
(1992b)
‘Chūgoku no ryōkaihō to Senkaku
shotō mondai (chū)’
, Kokubō (The National Defense)41(10):
42-53
.
Hollis, Martin
and
Steve Smith
(1991) Explaining and Understanding International
Relations.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
76.
Holloway, Nigel
(1988)
‘Fair Weather Friends’
, Far Eastern Economic Review, 8 September, p.
117
.
77.
Hook, Glenn D.
,
Julie Gilson
,
Christopher W. Hughes
and
Hugo Dobson
(2001) Japan’s International Relations: Politics,
Economics and Security. Sheffield Centre for Japanese
Studies/Routledge Series,
London and New York: Routledge
.
78.
Hughes, Christopher W.
(1999) Japan’s Economic Power and Security: Japan
and North Korea.
London and New York: Routledge
.
79.
Huldt, Bo
(1996) ‘Introduction’, in
Bert Edström
(ed.) Japan’s Foreign and Security Policies in
Transition, pp. ix-xii.
Stockholm: Swedish Institute of International
Affairs and Center for Pacific Asia Studies
.
80.
Hunt, Kenneth
(1992) ‘Japan as a Regional and Global
Power’, in
Bo Huldt
(ed.) Japan as a Regional and Global Power, pp.
29-34. Conference Papers 13.
Stockholm: Swedish Institute of International Affairs
.
81.
Hveem, Helge
(1997) Makt och välfärd: Teorier i
internationell politisk ekonomi (Power and Welfare: Theories in International
Political Economy).
Stockholm: Universitetsforlaget
.
82.
Hyer, Eric
(1995)
‘The South China Sea Disputes: Implications of China’s
Earlier Territorial Settlements’
, Pacific Affairs68(1):
34-54
.
83.
Institute for National Strategic Studies
(11 October 2000) The United States and Japan: Advancing
Toward a Mature Partnership. INSS Special Report,
National Defense University
.
84.
Iriye, Akira
(1992) China and Japan in the Global Setting.
Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press
.
85.
Isaac, Jeffrey C.
(1992) ‘Beyond the Three Faces of Power: A
Realist Critique’, in
Thomas E. Wartenberg
(ed.) Rethinking Power, pp. 32-55.
Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
.
86.
Jepperson, Ronald L.
,
Alexander Wendt
and
Peter J. Katzenstein
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and Culture in National
Security,’ in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identities in World
Politics, pp. 33-78.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
87.
Johnson, Chalmers
(1995) Japan: Who Governs? The Rise of the Developmental
State.
New York and London: W.W. Norton
.
88.
Kajita Yukio
(1988)
‘Nitchū tōshi hogo kyōtei no igi to
naiyō (Significance and Contents of the Japan-China Investment
Protection Accords)’
, Kaigai jijō (Journal of World Affairs)39(9):
58-67
.
89.
Katada, Saori
(2001)
‘Why did Japan Suspend Foreign Aid to China? Japan’s
Foreign Aid Decision-making and Sources of Aid Sanction’
, Social Science Japan Journal4(1):
39-58
.
90.
Katayama Tokio
(1988)
‘Takeshita shushō hōchū to
Nitchū tōshi hogo kyōtei no
shūketsu’ (‘Prime Minister
Takeshita’s visit to China and the conclusion of the Japan-China
Bilateral Investment Treaty’)
, Nitchū keizai kyōkai kaihō
(Japan-China Economic Association Newsletter) (September):
13-16
.
91.
Katzenstein, Peter J.
(1996a) Cultural Norms and National Security: Police and
Military in Postwar Japan.
Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
.
92.
Katzenstein, Peter J.
(ed.) (1996b) The Culture of National Security: Norms and
Identities in World Politics.
New York, NY: Columbia University Press
.
93.
Katzenstein, Peter J.
(1996c) ‘Conclusion: National Security in a
Changing World’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identities in World
Politics, pp. 498-536.
New York, NY: Columbia University Press
.
94.
Kazankai
(ed.) (1998) Nichū kankei kihon
shiryōshū 1949 nen — 1997 nen (Basic collection of
materials in the Japan-China relationship 1949-1997).
Tokyo: Kazankai
.
95.
Kennedy, Paul
(1994) ‘Japan: A Twenty-First-Century
Power?’ in
Craig C. Garby
and
Mary Brown Bullock
(eds) Japan: A New Kind of Superpower?, pp.
193-199.
Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press;
Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
96.
Kim, Young C.
(2001)
‘Japanese Policy Towards China: Politics of the Imperial Visit to
China in 1992’
, Pacific Affairs74(2):
225-242
.
97.
Kivimäki, Timo
(2002)
‘“Reason” and “Power” in
Territorial Disputes: The South China Sea’
, Asian Journal of Social Science, no. 1:
525-546
.
98.
Knudsen, Olav Fagelund
(1994) Anarki og fellesskap: En innføring i
studiet av internasjonal politikk (Anarchy and Community: An Introduction to the
Study of International Politics).
Oslo: TANO/Universitetsforlaget
.
99.
Krause, Keith
(1991)
‘Military Statecraft: Power and Influence in Soviet and American
Arms Transfer Relationships’
, International Studies Quarterly35:
313-336
.
100.
Kumiya, Tomofumi
(1989) ‘5. Hōritsu (5. Law)
in
Chūgoku kenkyūjo
(ed.) Chūgoku nenkan: 1989 nenpan (The China Yearbook: 1989
Edition), pp. 68-69.
Tokyo: Taishūkan Shoten
.
101.
Lardy, Nicholas R.
(1994) China in the World Economy.
Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics
.
102.
Lind, Jennifer M.
(2004)
‘Pacifism or Passing the Buck? Testing Theories of Japanese
Security Policy’
, International Security29(1):
92-121
.
103.
Lukes, Steven
(1974) Power: A Radical View.
London: Macmillan Press
.
104.
Lukes, Steven
(1986) ‘Introduction’, in
Steven Lukes
(ed.) Power, pp. 1-18.
Oxford: Basil Blackwell
.
105.
Matsui, Yoshiro
(1997)
‘International Law of Territorial Acquisition and the Dispute
over the Senkaku (Diaoyu) Islands’
, Japanese Journal of International Law, no. 40:
3-31
.
106.
McKeown, Timothy J.
(1999)
‘Case Studies and the Statistical Worldview: Review of King,
Keohane, and Verba’s Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific
Inference in Qualitative Research’
, International Organization53(1):
161-190
.
107.
Merritt, Richard L.
and
Dina A. Zinnes
(1989) ‘Alternative Indexes of National
Power’, in
Richard J. Stoll
and
Michael D. Ward
(eds) Power in World Politics, pp. 11-28.
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers
.
108.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
[Gaimushō] (1972) Senkaku shotō ni tsuite
(On the Pinnacle Islands).
Tokyo: Information and Culture Bureau, Ministry
of Foreign Affairs
.
109.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(27 February 1992) Senkaku shotō (Owada jikan no
Yō Shin’a [Yang Zenya] taishi e no mōshiire)
(Pinnacle Islands [Administrative Vice-Minister Owada’s notice to
Ambassador Yang Zenya]).
110.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(5 March 1992) Senkaku shotō o meguru saikin no
dökō ni tsuite (Concerning the Latest Trends in Regard to the
Pinnacle Islands).
111.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(18 March 1992) Dai 12 kai Nitchū gaikō
tōkyokukan kyōgi (Hōjin kisha kaiken) Dai 927
gō (toriatsukai chūi) (The 12th meeting between the
diplomatic authorities in Japan and China [Press conference for Japanese
journalists] Number 927 [Handling Warning]).
112.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(8 April 1992) Nitchū shunō kaidan (kisha
buriifu) (Japan-China Prime Ministers’ Meeting[Journalists’ briefing]).
113.
Moravcsik, Andrew
(1997)
‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,’International Organization51(4):
513-553
.
114.
Morgenthau, Hans J.
(1948, brief edn 1993) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle
for Power and Peace. Revised by Kenneth W. Thompson.
New York: McGraw-Hill
.
115.
Morriss, Peter
(1987) Power: A Philosophical Analysis.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
116.
Naughton, Barry
(1994) ‘The Foreign Policy Implications of
China’s Economic Development Strategy’, in
Thomas W. Robinson
and
David Shambaugh
(eds) Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice, pp.
47-69.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
117.
Neack, Laura
,
Jeanne A. K. Hey
and
Patrick J. Haney
(1995) ‘Generational Change in
FPA’, in
Laura Neack
,
Jeanne A. K. Hey
and
Patrick J. Haney
(eds) FPA: Continuity and Change in its Second Generation, pp.
1-15.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
.
118.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr.
(1993, 4th edn2003) Understanding International Conflicts: An Introduction to
Theory and History.
New York, NY: Longman
.
119.
Ogura Kazuo
(1979)
‘How the “Inscrutables” Negotiate with the
“Inscrutables”: Chinese Negotiating Tactics
vis-à-vis the Japanese’
, China Quarterly, no. 79:
529-552
.
120.
Okabe Tatsumi
(1995) ‘Nijūisseiki e mukau Ajia
Taiheiyō to Nihon’ (‘Japan and Asia-Pacific Facing
the 21st Century’), in
Okabe Tatsumi
(ed.) Ajia seiji no mirai to Nihon (The future of Asian politics and
Japan), pp. 3-14.
Tokyo: Keisō shoten
.
121.
Pearson, Margaret M.
(1991) Joint Ventures in the People’s Republic of
China: The Control of Foreign Direct Investment under Socialism.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
122.
Reeve, Andrew
(1982)
‘Power Without Responsibility’
, Political Studies30:
77-86
.
123.
Rosecrance, Richard
(1986) The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest
in the Modern World.
New York, NY: Basic Books
.
124.
Rose, Caroline
(1998) Interpreting History in Sino-Japanese Relations: A
Case Study in Political Decision-Making.
London and New York: Routledge
.
Scheja, Max
(2000) ‘Determinants of Action as Conceptual
Devices for Analysing Learning Activities in Formal Educational
Settings’, in Intentionell analys (Intentional
Analysis). Forskningsrapporter från Pedagogiska institutionen, no.
64, pp. 1-17.
Stockholm: Stockholm University
.
127.
Scott, John
(ed.) (1994) Power: Critical Concepts, vols. 1 and 2.
London: Routledge
.
128.
Shaw, Han-yi
(1999) The Diaoyutai/Senkaku Islands Dispute: Its History and
an Analysis of the Ownership Claims of the P.R.C., R.O.C., and Japan.
Occasional Papers/Reprints Series in Contemporary Asian Studies,
no. 152 (no. 3 1999).
Baltimore, MD: School of Law, University of Maryland
.
129.
Shaw, Malcolm N.
(1991) International Law.
Cambridge: Grotius Publications. Quoted in Shaw
, 1999.
130.
Shida, Tomio
(1988)
‘Takeshita Visit to Open China Door Wider: Beijing Counts on
Japan Investment to Meet Goals’
, in Japan Economic Journal, 27 August:
3
.
131.
SIPRI homepage: http://www.sipri.se/.
132.
Solomon, Richard H.
(1995, new edn 1999) Chinese Negotiating Behavior: Pursuing
Interests Through ‘Old Friends’.
Washington, DC: United States Institute of
Peace Press
.
133.
Söderberg, Marie
(2002) ‘The Role of ODA in the
Relationship’, in
Marie Söderberg
(ed.) Chinese-Japanese Relations in the Twenty-First Century:
Complementarity and Conflict, pp. 114-129.
London and New York: Routledge
.
134.
Suganuma, Unryu
(2000) Sovereign Rights and Territorial Space in
Sino-Japanese Relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Asian
Interactions and Comparisons.
Honolulu: Association for Asian Studies and
University of Hawai’i Press
.
135.
Wallensteen, Peter
(1971) Ekonomiska sanktioner (Economic Sanctions).
Stockholm: Prisma
.
136.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1979) Theory of International Politics.
New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
.
137.
Waltz, Kenneth
(1993)
‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’
, International Security18(2):
44-79
.
138.
Wang, Yan
(2002) Chinese Legal Reform: The Case of Foreign Investment
Law.
London and New York: Routledge
.
139.
Watson, Adam
(1997) The Limits of Interdependence: Relations Between
States in the Modern World.
London and New York: Routledge
.
140.
First published in the Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und
Sozialpolitik in 1904.
141.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
142.
Whiting, Allen S.
(1998) ‘Chinese Foreign Policy: Retrospect and
Prospect’, in
Samuel S. Kim
(ed.) (1976, 4th edn 1998) China and the World, pp.
287-308.
Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press
.
143.
Wohlforth, William Curti
(1993) The Elusive Balance: Power and Perceptions During the
Cold War.
Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press
.
144.
Wu Xinbo
(2000)
‘The Security Dimension of Sino-Japanese Relations: Warily
Watching One Another’
, Asian Survey40(2):
296-310
.
145.
Yasutomo, Dennis T.
(1995) The New Multilateralism in Japan’s Foreign
Policy.
London: Macmillan Press
.
146.
Zhang, Dong Dong
(1998a) China’s Relations with Japan in an Era of
Economic Liberalisation.
New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers
.
147.
Zhang, Dong Dong
(1998b)
‘Negotiating for a Liberal Economic Regime: The Case of Japanese
FDI in China’
, Pacific Review11(1):
51-78
.
148.
Zhao, Quansheng
(1995) Japanese Policymaking: The Politics Behind Politics:
Informal Mechanisms and the Making of China Policy.
Hong Kong, Oxford and New York: Oxford
University Press
.
149.
Zhao, Quansheng
(1996) Interpreting Chinese Foreign Policy.
Hong Kong, Oxford and New York: Oxford
University Press.
150.
Asahi Shimbun (AS); British Broadcasting Corporation, Summary of World
Broadcasts (SWB).
151.
Beijing Review (BR); Chûgoku Geppô (CG); Foreign
Broadcast Information Service (FBIS).
