The prime claim of the theory of securitization is that the articulation of security
produces a specific threatening state of affairs. Within this theory, power is
derived from the use of ‘appropriate’ words in conformity with
established rules governing speech acts. I argue, however, that a speech act view of
security does not provide adequate grounding upon which to examine security
practices in ‘real situations’. For instance, many security
utterances counter the ‘rule of sincerity’ and, the intrinsic
power attributed to ‘security’ overlooks the objective context
in which security agents are situated. As a corrective, I put forward three basic
assumptions — (i) that an effective securitization is audience-centered;
(ii) that securitization is context-dependent; (iii) that an effective
securitization is power-laden. The insights gleaned from the investigation of these
assumptions are progressively integrated into the pragmatic act of security, the
value of which is to provide researchers in the field with a tractable number of
variables to investigate in order to gain a better understanding of the linguistic
manufacture of threats.
Austin, John L.
(1962) How to do Things with Words.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
4.
Austin, John L.
(1970) Philosophical Papers.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
5.
Austin, John L.
(1971)
‘Performative-Constative’, in
John R. Searle
(ed.) Philosophy of Language, pp. 13-22.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
6.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M.
(1986) ‘The Problem of Speech
Genre’, in
Caryl Emerson
and
Michael Holquist
(eds.) Speech Genre and Other Late Essays, pp.
60-102.
Austin: University of Texas Press
.
7.
Balzacq, Thierry
(2004) ‘The Pragmatic Act of Security: Politics and
Methods.’ Unpublished manuscript.
8.
Bar-Tal, Daniel
(2000) Shared Beliefs in a Society: Social Psychological
Analysis.
London: Sage
.
9.
Bateson, Patrick
(2000) ‘What Must be Known in Order to
Understand Imprinting?’, in
Cecilia Heyes
and
Ludwig Huber
(eds) The Evolution of Cognition, pp.
85-102.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
10.
Bigo, Didier
(2000) ‘When Two Become One: Internal and
External Securitisations in Europe’, in
Morten Kelstrup
and
Michael C. Williams
(eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European
Integration, Power, Security and Community, pp.
142-148.
London: Routledge
.
11.
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1979)
‘Symbolic Power’
. Critique of Anthropology4:
77-85
.
12.
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1990) The Logic of Practice, trans. R. Nice.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
13.
Bourdieu, Pierre
(1991) Language and Symbolic Power, trans. G. Raymond
and M. Adamson.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
14.
Brand, Miles
(1984) Intending and Acting: Toward a Naturalized Action
Theory.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
15.
Burke, Kenneth
(1955) A Rhetoric of Motives.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
16.
Buzan, Barry
and
Ole Wæver
(1997)
‘Slippery? Contradictory? Sociologically Untenable? The
Copenhagen School Replies’
. Review of International Studies23(2):
241-250
.
17.
Buzan, Barry
and
Ole Wæver
(2003) Regions of Power: The Structure of International
Relations Theory.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
18.
Buzan, Barry
,
Morten Kelstrup
,
Pierre Lemaitre
,
Elzbieta Tromer
and
Ole Wæver
(1990) The European Security Order Recast: Scenarios for the
Post-Cold War Era.
London: Pinter Publishers
.
19.
Buzan, Barry
,
Ole Wæver
and
Jaap de Wilde
(1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis.
Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner
.
20.
Campbell, David
(1992) Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the
Politics of Identity.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
21.
Cavell, Stanley
(2002) Must We Mean What We Say?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
22.
Danto, Alan R.
(ed.) (1968) The Philosophy of Action.
London: Oxford University Press
.
23.
Dauber, Colin
(2001)
‘Images as Argument: The Impact of Mogadishu on US Military Intervention’
. Armed Forces and Society27(2):
205-229
.
24.
Davidson, Donald
(1963)
‘Actions, Reasons and Causes’
. The Journal of Philosophy60(23):
685-700
.
25.
Davidson, Donald
(1982) Essays on Actions and Events.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
26.
Debrix, François
(ed.) (2003) Language, Agency, and Politics in a Constructed
World.
Armonk: M.E. Sharpe
.
27.
Dillon, Michael
(1996) The Politics of Security: Towards a Political
Philosophy of Continental Thought.
London: Routledge
.
28.
Doty, Roxanne L.
(1998/99)
‘Immigration and the Politics of Security’
, Security Studies8(2/3):
71-93
.
29.
Eckard, Rolf
(1990) ‘The Concept of
Action’, in
Amine Burkhardt
(ed.) Speech Acts, Meaning and Intentions: Critical Approaches to the
Philosophy of John R. Searle, pp. 147-165.
Berlin: Walter de Gruyter
.
30.
Edelman, Murray
(1988) Constructing the Political Spectacle.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
.
31.
Emirbayer, Mustafa
(1997)
‘Manifesto for a Relational Sociology’
. American Journal of Sociology103(2):
281-317
.
32.
Emirbayer, Mustafa
and
Ann Mische
(1998)
‘What is Agency?’
. American Journal of Sociology1013(4):
962-1023
.
33.
Fearon, James
(1999) ‘What Is Identity (As We Now Use the
Word?)’. Unpublished manuscript,
Stanford University, Stanford
.
34.
Feenley, Paul W.
(1995) Securitization: Redefining the Bank.
London: Macmillan
.
35.
Ferguson, Yale
and
Richard W. Mansbach
(1996) Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change.
Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
.
36.
Forguson, L.W.
(1969) ‘Austin’s Philosophy of
Action’, in
K.T. Fann
(ed.) Symposium on J.L. Austin, pp. 127-147.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
.
37.
Fotion, Nick
(2000) John Searle.
Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
.
38.
Foucault, Michel
(1980) Power/Knowledge.
New York: Pantheon Books
.
39.
Gardener, Edward P.M.
and
Jacques Revell
(1988) Securitization; History, Forms and Risks.
Bangor: Institute of European Finance
.
40.
Giddens, Anthony
(1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure
and Contradiction in Social Analysis.
London: Macmillan
.
41.
Grace, George W.
(1987) The Linguistic Construction of Reality.
London: Croom Helm
.
42.
Gusfield, Joseph R.
(1981) The Culture of Public Problems: Drinking-Driving and
the Symbolic Order.
Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press
.
43.
Guzzini, Stefano
and
Dietrich Jung
(2004) Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace
Research.
London: Routledge
.
44.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1984) Theory of Communication Action, Vol. 1: Reason and
Rationalization of Society.
Boston, MA: Beacon Press
.
45.
Hansen, Lene
(2000)
‘The Little Marmaid’s Silent Security Dilemma and the
Absence of Gender in the Copenhagen School’
. Millennium29(2):
285-306
.
46.
Herman, Edward S.
and
Noam Chomsky
(1989) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the
Mass Media.
New York: Pantheon Books
.
47.
Hopf, Ted
(2002) Social Construction of International Politics:
Identities and Foreign Policies, Moscow, 1995 and 1999.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
48.
Huysmans, Jef
(1998a)
‘Revisiting Copenhagen: Or, on the Creative Development of a
Security Studies Agenda in Europe’
. European Journal of International Relations4(4):
488-506
.
49.
Huysmans, Jef
(1998b)
‘Security! What do you Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier’
. European Journal of International Relations4(2):
226-255
.
50.
‘I Dunno’
, The Korean Times, 15 May 2003. Available from
http//times.hankooki.com/cgi-bin/hkiprn.cgi?/pa%20=/lpage/opinion/200303/kt20030325164.
Accessed 15 May 2003.
51.
Johnson-Laird, Philip N.
(1983) Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of
Language, Inference and Consciousness.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
52.
Kasper, Gabriele
(1990)
‘Linguistic Politeness: Current Research Issues’
. Journal of Pragmatics14:
187-218
.
53.
Kaufman, Stuart J.
(1996)
‘Spiralling to Ethnic War: Elites, Masses, and Moscow in
Moldova’s Civil War’
. International Security21(2):
108-138
.
54.
Knudsen, Olav F.
(2001)
‘Post-Copenhagen Security Studies: Desecuritizing Securitization’
. Security Dialogue32(3):
355-368
.
55.
Krause, Keith
and
Michael C. Williams
(1996)
‘Broadening the Agenda of Security Studies: Politics and Methods’
. Mershon International Studies Review40(2):
229-254
.
56.
Krause, Keith
and
Michael C. Williams
(1997) ‘From Strategy to Security: Foundations
of Critical Security Studies’, in
Keith Krause
and
Michael C. Williams
(eds) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, pp.
33-60.
Minnesota, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
57.
Laclau, Ernesto
and
Chantal Mouffe
(1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical
Democratic Politics.
London: Verso
.
58.
Larsen, Henrik
(1997) Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain
and Europe.
London: Routledge
.
59.
Levinson, Stephen C.
(1983) Pragmatism.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
60.
Lorenz, Konrad
(1981) The Foundation of Ethology.
New York: Springer-Verlag
.
61.
Lupia, Arthur
and
Mathew D. McCubbins
(1998) The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They
Need to Know?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
62.
McGinn, Marie
(1997) Wittgenstein and Philosophical Investigation.
London: Routledge
.
63.
McLauglin, Peter
(2001) What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and
Self-Reproducing Systems.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
64.
McSweeney, Bill
(1996)
‘Identity and Security: Buzan and the Copenhagen School’
. Review of International Studies22(1):
81-93
.
65.
Mey, Jacob L.
(2001) Pragmatics: An Introduction.
Oxford: Blackwell
.
66.
Milliken, Jennifer
(1999)
‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of
Research and Methods’
. European Journal of International Relations5 (2):
257-286
67.
Morris, Peter
(1987) Power: A Philosophical Analysis.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
68.
Neumann, Iver B.
(1999) The Uses of Other: The ‘East’ in
European Identity Formation.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
69.
Onuf, Nicholas G.
(1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory
and International Relations.
Columbia, SC: University of California Press
.
70.
Perelman, Chaïm
and
Lucie Olbrechts-Tytecka
(1969) The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation.
Notre Dame, IN.: The University of Notre Dame Press
.
71.
Perinbanayagam, R.S.
(1991) Discursive Acts.
New York: Aldine de Gruyter
.
72.
Ricœur, Paul
(1981) Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
73.
Ringmar, Erik
(1996) Identity, Interest, and Action: A Cultural Explanation
of Sweden’s Intervention in the Thirty Years War.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
74.
Risse, Thomas
(2000)
‘“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative
Action in World Politics’
. International Organization54(1):
1-40
.
75.
Sapir, Edward
(1934) ‘Symbolism’, in
Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences.
London: Macmillan
.
76.
Saunders, A.N.W.
(1970) Greek Political Oratory.
Harmondsworth: Penguin
.
77.
Schiffrin, Deborah
(1994) Approaches to Discourse.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
.
78.
Schneider, Anne
and
Helen Ingram
(1993)
‘Social Construction of Target Populations: Implications for
Politics and Policy’
. American Political Science Review87(2):
334-337
.
79.
Searle, John
(1969) Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of
Language.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
80.
Searle, John R
(1977) ‘A Classification of Illocutionary
Acts’, in
P. Cole
and
J. Morgan
(eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, pp.
59-82.
New York: Academic Press
.
81.
Searle, John R.
(1983) Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of
Mind.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
82.
Searle, John R.
(1991) ‘What is a Speech
Act’, in
Steven Davis
(ed.) Pragmatics: A Reader, pp. 254-264.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
83.
Searle, John R.
and
Daniel Vanderveken
(1985) Foundations of Illocutionary Logic.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
84.
Skinner, Quentin
(2002) Visions of Politics. Vol. 1: Regarding Method.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
85.
Smith, Steve
(1999)
‘The Increasing Insecurity of Security Studies: Conceptualizing
Security in the Last Twenty Years’
. Contemporary Security Policy20(3):
72-101
.
86.
Snyder, Jack
and
Karen Ballentine
(1996)
‘Nationalism and the Market Place of Ideas’
. International Security21(2):
5-40
.
87.
Stevenson, Rosemary
(1993) Language, Thought and Representation.
Chichester: John Wiley
.
88.
Suganami, Hidemi
(1999)
‘Agents, Structures, Narratives’
. European Journal of International Relations5(3):
365-386
.
89.
Thompson, John B.
(1991) ‘Editor’s
Introduction’, in Pierre Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic
Power, trans G. Raymond and M. Adamson.
Cambridge: Polity Press
.
90.
Todorov, Tzvetan
(1983) Symbolism and Interpretation.
London: Routledge & Kegan Paul
.
91.
Violi, Patrizia
(2001) Meaning and Experience, trans. Jeremy Garden.
Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press
.
92.
Wæver, Ole
(1989) ‘Security, the Speech Act: Analyzing the
Politics of a Word’, Working Paper 19.
Copenhagen: Center for Peace and Conflict Research
.
93.
Wæver, Ole
(1995) ‘Securitization and
Desecuritization’, in
Ronnie D. Lipschutz
(ed.) On Security.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
94.
Wæver, Ole
,
Barry Buzan
,
Morten Kelstrup
and
Pierre Lemaitre
(1993) Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in
Europe.
London: Pinter Publishers
.
Walt, Stephen
(1991)
‘The Renaissance of Security Studies’
, International Studies Quarterly35(2):
211-239
.
97.
Weldes, Jutta
(1999) Constructing National Interests: The US and the Cuban
Missile Crisis.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
98.
Weldes, Jutta
,
Mark Laffey
,
Hugh Gusterson
and
Raymond Duvall
(1999) ‘Introduction: Constructing
Insecurity’, in
Jutta Weldes
,
Mark Laffey
,
Hugh Gusterson
and
Raymond Duvall
(eds) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of
Danger, pp. 1-34.
Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press
.
99.
White, Eugene E.
(1992) The Context of Human Discourse: A Configurational
Criticism of Rhetoric.
Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press
.
100.
Williams, Michael C.
(2003)
‘Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics’
. International Studies Quarterly47(4):
511-531
.
101.
Williams, Raymond
(1976) Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society.
London: Fontana
.
102.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig
(2001[1958]) Philosophical Investigations.
Oxford: Blackwell Publishers
.
103.
Wright, Georg Henrik, von
(1971) Explanation and Understanding.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
104.
Wyn Jones, Richard
(1995)
‘“Message in a Bottle?” Theory and Praxis of
Critical Security Studies’
. Contemporary Security Policy16(3):
299-319
.
