Recently, calls for a ‘synthesis’ between rationalist and
constructivist approaches have become louder. The question how the different
ontological presuppositions of the two paradigms can be reconciled has been
neglected. Starting from the ubiquity of ‘arguing’ and
‘bargaining’ in international negotiations, the article explores
the various rationalist attempts to give an explanation for the use of these two
types of speech acts by negotiatiors. It finds that eventually all these attempts
seek resort to social explanations that deviate from the individualist ontology of
rationalism. Efforts to specify the conditions under which negotiators follow
alternatively a logic of consequentialism and appropriateness tend in fact to
privilege either one or the other. Integration appears only possible if one assumes
that the change between the two types of speech acts is guided by norms and rules
that are shared among negotiators. This proposition suggests that the interest-based
negotiation style follows a logic of appropriateness as much as a negotiation style
aiming at communicative persuasion. This proposition, however, does not imply
harmony or stasis. Rather, it accounts for conflicts of different understandings of
appropriateness in intercultural, transnational and two-level discourses.
Adler, Emanuel
(2002) ‘Constructivism and International
Relations’, in
W. Carlsnaes,T. Risse
and
B.A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
95-118.
London: SAGE Publications
.
2.
Albin, Cecilia
(2001) Justice and Fairness in International
Negotiation.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
3.
Apel, Karl-Otto
(1973) Transformation der Philosophie, Vol. I.
Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp
.
4.
Armstrong, David
(1999) ‘The Diplomacy of Revolutionary
States’, in
Jan Melissen
(ed.) Innovation in Diplomatic Practice, pp.
43-59.
London: Macmillan
.
5.
Axelrod, Robert
(1984) The Evolution of Cooperation.
New York: Basic Books
.
6.
Barnett, Michael
(1995)
‘Sovereignty, Nationalism, and Regional Order in the Arab States System’
, International Organization49(3):
479-510
.
7.
Barnett, Michael N.
(1996) ‘Identity and Alliances in the Middle
East’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security, pp.
400-447.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
8.
Barnett, Michael N.
(1999)
‘Culture, Strategy and Foreign Policy Change: Israel’s
Road to Oslo’
, European Journal of International Relations5(1):
5-36
.
9.
Bar-Siman-Tov, Yaacov
(1994) Israel and the Peace Process, 1977-1982.
Albany: State University of New York Press
.
10.
Beer, Francis A.
and
Robert Hariman
(1996) ‘Realism and Rhetoric in International
Relations’, in
Francis A. Beer
and
Robert Hariman
(eds) Post-Realism: The Rhetorical Turn in International
Relations, pp. 1-34.
East Lansing, MI: Michigan University Press
.
Berger, Thomas U.
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and National Security
in Germany and Japan’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security, pp.
317-356.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
13.
Biersteker, Thomas J.
and
Cynthia Weber
(1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construct.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
14.
Blaney, Davie
and
Naem Inayatullah
(1998) ‘International Political Economy as a
Culture of Competition’, in
Dominique Jacquin-Berdal
and
Andrew Oros
(eds) Culture in World Politics, pp. 61-88.
London: Macmillan
.
15.
Bonham, G. Matthew,Victor M. Sergeev
and
Pravel P. Parshin
(1997)
‘The Limited Test-Ban Agreement: Emergence of New Knowledge
Structures in International Negotiation’
, International Science Quarterly41:
215-240
.
16.
Bull, Hedley
(1977) ‘The Anarchical Society. A Study of
Order’, in World Politics.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
17.
Buzan, Barry
,
Ole Waever
and
Jaap de Wilde
(1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis.
Boulder: Rienner
.
18.
Carlsnaes, Walter,Thomas Risse
and
Beth A. Simmons
(eds) (2002) Handbook of International Relations.
London: Sage Publications
.
19.
Checkel, Jeffrey T.
(1997)
‘International Norms and Domestic Politics: Bridging the
Rationalist-Constructivist Divide’
, European Journal of International Relations3(4):
473-495
.
20.
Checkel, Jeffrey
(1999)
‘Norms, Institutions, and National Identity in Contemporary Europe’
, International Studies Quarterly43(1):
83-114
.
21.
Checkel, Jeffrey
(2001)
‘From Meta- to Substantive Theory? Social Constructivism and the
Study of Europe’
, European Union Politics2(2):
219-226
.
22.
Chilton, Paul
(ed.) (1985) Language and the Nuclear Arms Debate: Nukespeak
Today.
London and Dover: Pinter
.
23.
Cohen, Raymond
(1997) Negotiating Across Cultures. International
Communication in an Interdependent World.
Washington, DC: United States Institute of
Peace Press
.
24.
Cohen, Raymond
(1999) ‘Reflections on the New Global Diplomacy:
Statecraft 2500 BC to 2000 AD’, in
Jan Melissen
(ed.) Innovation in Diplomatic Practice, pp.
1-20.
London: Macmillan
.
25.
Cohen, Raymond
(2000)
‘Meaning, Interpretation and International Negotiation’
, Global Society14(3):
317-335
.
26.
Cohen, Raymond
(2001)
‘Language and Conflict Resolution: The Limits of English’
, International Studies Review3(1):
25-51
.
27.
Cortell, Andrew P.
and
James W. Davis, Jr
(2000)
‘Understanding the Domestic Impact of International Norms: A
Research Agenda’
, International Studies Review2(1):
65-87
.
28.
Crawford, Neta C.
(2002) Argument and Change in World Politics. Ethics,
Decolonialization and Humanitarian Intervention.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
29.
Deitelhoff, Nicole (mimeo) ‘Normgenerierungsprozesse in der
internationalen Politik aus handlungstheoretischer Perspektive’.
30.
Dessler, David
(1989)
‘What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?’
, International Organization43(3):
454-485
.
31.
Ecker-Ehrhardt, Matthias
(2002)
‘Alles nur Rhetorik? Der ideelle Vorder-und Hintergrund der
deutschen Debatte zur EU-Osterweiterung’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen9(2):
209-252
.
32.
Elster, Jon
(1991) Arguing and Bargaining in Two Constituents Assemblies,
The Storrs Lectures.
New Haven: Yale Law School
.
33.
Elster, Jon
(1992) ‘Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal
Convention and the Assemblée Constituante’, in
Raino Malnes
and
Arild Underdal
(eds) Rationality and Institutions.
Essays in Honour of Knut Midgaard, Oslo
.
34.
Elster, Jon
(1995) ‘Strategic Uses of
Arguments’, in
Kenneth J. Arrowet al.
(eds) Barriers to Conflict Resolution, pp.
236-257.
New York and London: W.W. Norton
.
35.
Evans, Peter,Harold K. Jacobson
and
Robert B. Putnam
(eds) (1993) Double-edged Diplomacy: International Bargaining
and Domestic Politics.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
36.
Faure, Guy Olivier
(1999) ‘Cultural Aspects of International
Negotiations’, in
Peter Berton,Hiroshi Kimura
and
I. William Zartman
(eds) International Negotiation. Actors, Structure/Process,
Values, pp. 11-32.
London: Macmillan
.
37.
Fearon, James D.
(1997)
‘Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs’
, Journal of Conflict Resolution41(1):
68-90
.
38.
Fearon, James
and
Alexander Wendt
(2002) ‘Rationalism vs Constructivism: A
Skeptical View’, in
W. Carlsnaes,T. Risse
and
B.A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
52-72.
London: Sage Publications
.
39.
Field, Alexander
(1984)
‘Microeconomics, Norms, and Rationality’
, Economic Development and Cultural Change32:
683-711
.
40.
Fierke, Karin M.
(1998) Chainging Games, Changing Strategies: Investigations
in Security.
Manchester: Manchester University Press
.
41.
Fierke, Karin M.
(1999)
‘Dialogues of Manoeuvre and Entanglement: NATO, Russia, and the CEECs’
, Millenium28(1):
27-52
.
42.
Fierke, Karin M.
(2001) ‘Critical Methodology and
Constructivism’, in
Karin Fierkeet al.
(eds) Constructing International Relations. The Next Generation,
pp. 115-136.
London and Armonk: M.E. Sharpe
.
43.
Fierke, Karin M.
(2002)
‘Links Across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations’
, International Studies Quarterly46(3):
331-354
.
44.
Finnemore, Martha
(1996a)
‘Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from
Sociology’s Institutionalism’
, International Organization50(2):
325-347
.
45.
Finnemore, Martha
(1996b) ‘Constructing Norms of Humanitarian
Intervention’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security, pp.
153-185.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
46.
Finnemore, Martha
and
Kathrin Sikkink
(1998)
‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’
, International Organization52(4):
887-917
.
47.
Frank, Thomas M.
(1990) The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations.
New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
48.
Frank, Thomas M.
(1995) Fairness in International Law and Institutions.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
49.
Garrett, Geoffrey
and
Barry R. Weingast
(1993) ‘Ideas, Interests and Institutions:
Constructing the European Community’s Internal
Market’, in
Judith Goldstein
and
Robert O. Keohane
(eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political
Change, pp. 173-206.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
50.
Garthoff, Raymond C.
(1985) Détente and Confrontation in
American-Soviet Relations From Nixon to Reagan.
Washington, DC: Brookings
.
51.
Gehring, Thomas
(1996a) ‘Arguing und Bargaining in
internationalen Verhandlungen. Überlegungen am Beispiel des
Ozonschutz-Regimes’, in
Volker von Prittwitz
(ed.) Verhandeln und Argumentieren, pp.
208-238.
Opladen: Leske und Budnich
.
52.
Gehring, Thomas
(1996b)
‘Regieren im Internationalen System. Verhandlungen, Normen und
Internationale Regime’
, Politische Vierteljahresschrift36(2):
197-219
.
53.
Goertz, Gary
(2003) International Norms and Decision Making. A Punctuated
Equilibrium Model.
Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield
.
54.
Haacke, Jürgen
(1996)
‘Theory and Praxis in International Relations: Habermas,
Self-Reflection, Rational Argumentation’
, Millenium: Journal of International Studies25:
255-289
.
55.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1981) Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns, 2 Bde.
Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp
.
56.
Habermas, Jürgen
(1996) Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse
Theory of Law and Democracy.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
.
57.
Habermas, Jürgen
(2001) Kommunikatives Handeln und detranszendentalisierte
Vernunft.
Stuttgart: Reclam
.
58.
Hampson, Fen Osler
with
Michael Hart
(1995) Multilateral Negotiations. Lessons from Arms Control,
Trade and the Environment.
Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press
.
59.
Hardin, Russel
(2002) Trust and Trustworthiness.
New York: Russell Sage Foundation
.
60.
Hasenclever, Andreas,Peter Mayer
and
Volker Rittberger
(1997) Theories of International Regimes.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
61.
Holzinger, Katharina
(2001a)
‘Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch
Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie’
, Politische Vierteljahresschrift42:
414-446
.
62.
Holzinger, Katharina
(2001b)
‘Kommunikationsmodi und Handlungstypen in denInternationalen
Beziehungen. Anmerkungen zu einigen irreführenden Dichotomien’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen8(2):
243-286
.
63.
Hurd, Ian
(1999)
‘Legitimacy and Authority in International Politics’
, International Organization53(2):
379-408
.
64.
Hurrell, Andrew
(2002) ‘Norms and Ethics in International
Relations’, in
W. Carlsnaes,T. Risse
and
B.A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
147-154.
London: Sage Publications
.
65.
Ikenberry, G. John
(2002)
‘America’s Imperial Ambition’
, Foreign Affairs81(5):
44-60
.
66.
Jepperson, Ronald L.
,
Alexander Wendt
and
Peter J. Katzenstein
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and Culture in National
Security’, in
Peter J. Katzenstein
(ed.) The Culture of National Security, pp.
33-75.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
67.
Jervis, Robert
(1970) The Logic of Images in International Relations.
Princeton: Princeton University Press
.
68.
Johnson, Rebecca
(1995)
‘Indefinite Extension of the NPT: Risks and Reckonings’
, ACRONYM7, September.
69.
Johnston, Alistair Jain
(2001)
‘Treating International Institutions as Social Environments’
, International Studies Quarterly45:
487-515
.
70.
Jönsson, Christer
(1990) Communication in International Bargaining.
New York: St Martins Press
.
71.
Jönsson, Christer
(2002) ‘Diplomacy, Bargaining and
Negotiation’, in
W. Carlsneaes,T. Risse
and
B.A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
212-234.
London: Sage Publications
.
72.
Katzenstein, Peter J.
(ed.) (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and
Identity in World Politics.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
73.
Katzenstein, Peter J., Robert O. Keohane and Stephen D. Krasner (eds.)
(1998)
‘International Organization at Fifty. Exploration and
Contestation in the Study for World Politics’
, International Organization Special Edition52(4).
74.
Keck, Margaret
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Transnational Advocacy
Networks in International Politics.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
75.
Keck, Otto
(1995)
‘Rationales kommunikatives Handeln in den Internationalen
Beziehungen. Ist eine Verbindung von Rational-Choice-Theorie und
Habermas’ Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns möglich?’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen2(1):
5-48
.
76.
Keck, Otto
(1997)
‘Zur sozialen Konstruktion des Rational-Choice-Ansatzes. Einige
Klarstellungen zur Rationalismus-Konstruktivismus-Debatte’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen4(1):
139-151
.
77.
Keohane, Robert O.
(1989) International Institutions and State Power. Essays in
International Relations Theory.
Boulder: Westview
.
78.
Kepel, Gilles
(2002) Das Schwarzbuch des Dschihad. Aufstieg und Niedergang
des Islamismus.
München: Piper
.
79.
Kowert, Paul
and
Jeffrey Legro
(1996) ‘Norms, Identity, and their Limits: A
Theoretical Reprise’, in Peter J. Katzenstein, The
Culture of National Security, pp. 451-497.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
80.
Krasner, Stephen D.
(1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime
Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in
Stephen D. Krasner
(ed.) International Regimes, pp. 1-22.
Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
.
81.
Krasner, Stephen D.
(1985) Structural Conflict. The Third World Against Global
Liberalism.
Berkeley, CA: University of California Press
.
82.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
(1988)
‘The Protagorean Quest: Community, Justice, and the
“Oughts” and “Musts” of
International Politics’
, International Journal43:
205-240
.
83.
Kratochwil, Friedrich
(1989) Rules, Norms and Decisions. On the Conditions of
Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic
Affairs.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
84.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V.
(2000) ‘How Do Norms
Matter?’, in
Michael Byers
(ed.) The Role of Law in International Politics: Essays in International
Relations and in International Law, pp. 35-68.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
85.
Kydd, Andrew
(2000)
‘Trust, Reassurance, and Cooperation’
, International Organization54(2):
801-828
.
86.
Kydd, Andrew
and
Duncan Snidal
(1993) ‘Progress in Game-Theoretical Analysis of
International Regimes’, in
Volker Rittberger
(ed. with the assistance of
Peter Mayer
) Regime Theory and International Relations, pp.
112-135.
Oxford: Clarendon Press
.
87.
Linklater, Andrew
(1996) ‘The Achievements of Critical
Theory’, in
Steve Smithet al.
(eds) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, pp.
279-298.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
88.
Lose, Lars G.
(2001) ‘Communicative Action and the World of
Diplomacy’, in
Karin Fierkeet al.
(eds) Constructing International Relations. The Next Generation,
pp. 179-200.
London and Armonk: M.E. Sharpe
.
89.
Lynch, Marc
(2002)
‘Why Engage? China and the Logic of Communicative Engagement’
, European Journal of International Relations Theory8(2):
187-230
.
90.
Mansfield, Harvey C.
(1995)
‘Self-Interest Rightly Understood’
, Political Theory23(1):
43-66
.
91.
March, James G.
and
Johan P. Olsen
(1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis
of Politics.
New York: Free Press
.
92.
March, James G.
and
Johan P. Olsen
(1998)
‘The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders’International Organization52(4):
943-969
.
93.
Mercer, Jonathan
(1996) Reputation and International Politics.
Ithaca: Cornell University Press
.
94.
Morrow, James D.
(1994)
‘Modeling the Forms of International Cooperation: Distribution
versus Information’
, International Organization48(3):
387-424
.
95.
Morrow, James D.
(1999) ‘The Strategic Setting of Choices:
Signaling, Commitment, and Negotiation in International
Politics’, in
David A. Lake
and
Robert Powell
(eds) Strategic Choice and International Relations, pp.
77-114.
Princeton: Princeton University Press
.
96.
Müller, Harald
(1993) Die Chance der Kooperation. Regime in den
internationalen Beziehungen.
Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft
.
97.
Müller, Harald
(1994)
‘Internationale Beziehungen als kommunikatives Handeln. Zur
Kritik der utilitaristischen Handlungstheorien’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen1(1):
15-44
.
98.
Müller, Harald
(1995)
‘Spielen hilft nicht immer. Die Grenzen des
Rational-Choice-Ansatzes und der Platz der Theorie kommunikativen Handelns
in der Analyse internationaler Beziehungen’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen2(2):
371-391
.
99.
Müller, Harald
(2001) ‘International Relations as Communicative
Action’, in
Karin Fierke,
and
Knud Erik Joergensen
(eds) Constructing International Relations. The Next Generation,
pp. 160-170.
New York and London: M.E. Sharpe
.
100.
Müller, Harald
(2003)
‘German National Identity and WMD Nonproliferation’
, The Nonproliferation Review10(2):
1-20
.
101.
Müller, Harald
,
David Fischer
and
Wolfgang Kötter
(1994) Nuclear Non-Proliferation and Global Order.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
102.
Nadelmann, Ethan
(1990)
‘Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in
International Society’
, International Organization44(4):
479-26
.
103.
Neyer, Jürgen
(2002)
‘Politische Herrschaft in nicht-hierarchischen Mehrebenensystemen’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen9(1):
9-38
.
104.
Offe, Claus
(1996) ‘Political Economy: Sociological
Perspectives’, in
Robert G. Goodin
and
Hans-Dieter Klingemann
(eds) A New Handbook of Political Science, pp.
675-690.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
105.
Payne, Roger A.
(2001)
‘Persuasion, Frames, and Norm Construction’
, European Journal of International Relations7(1):
37-61
.
106.
Price, Richard
(1998)
‘Reversing the Gun Sights. Transnational Civil Society Targets
Land Mines’
, International Organization52(3):
613-644
.
107.
Pruitt, Dean G.
(1995) ‘Networks and Collective Scripts: Paying
Attention to Structure in Bargaining Theory’, in
Roderick M. Kramer
and
David M. Messick
(eds) Negotiation as a Social Process, pp.
37-47.
Thousand Oaks: Sage Publicataions
.
108.
Pruitt, Dean G.
and
Peter J. Carnevale
(1993) Negotiation in Social Conflicts, pp.
119-129.
Pacific Grove: CA: Brooks/Grove Publishing Company
.
109.
Quandt, William B.
(1986) Camp David. Peacemaking and Politics.
Washington DC: Brookings
.
110.
Rapoport, Anatol
(1960) Fights, Games and Debates.
Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
.
111.
Resende, Santos
(1996)
‘Anarchy and the Evolution of Military Systems: Military
Organization and Technology in South America’
, Security Studies5:
193-260
.
112.
Reus-Smit, Christian
(1997)
‘The Constitutional Structure of International Society and the
Nature of Fundamental Institutions’
, International Organization51(4):
555-589
.
113.
Risse, Thomas
(1999)
‘International Norms and Domestic Change: Arguing and
Communicative Behavior in the Human Rights Area’
, Politics & Society27(4):
529-559
.
114.
Risse, Thomas
(2000)
‘“Let’s Argue!”: Communicative
Action in World Politics’
, International Organization54(1):
1-39
.
115.
Risse, Thomas
(2002) ‘Transnational Actors and World
Politics’, in
W. Carlsnaes,T. Risse
and
B.A. Simmons
(eds) Handbook of International Relations, pp.
255-274.
London: Sage Publications
.
116.
Risse, Thomas,Stephen C. Ropp
and
Kathryn Sikkink
(eds) (1999) The Power of Human Rights. International Norms
and Domestic Change.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
117.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1995a) ‘Bringing Transnational Actors Back In:
Introduction’, in
Thomas Risse-Kappen
(ed.) Bringing Transnational Actors Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic
Structures and International Institutions, pp. 3-33.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
118.
Risse-Kappen, Thomas
(1995b)
‘Reden ist nicht billig. Zur Debatte um Kommunikation und Rationalität’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen2(1):
171-184
.
119.
Rittberger, Volker
(ed.) (1993) Regime Theory and International Relations.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
120.
Scharpf, Fritz W.
(1997) ‘Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered
Institutionalism’, in Policy Research.
Boulder: Westview
.
121.
Schiemann, John W.
(2000)
‘Meeting Halfway Between Rochester and Frankfurt: Generative
Salience, Focal Points, and Strategic Interaction’
, American Journal of Political Science44(1):
1-16
.
122.
Schimmelfennig, Frank
(1995) Debatten zwischen Staaten. Eine Argumentationstheorie
internationaler Systemkonflikte.
Opladen: Leske & Budrich
.
123.
Schimmelfennig, Frank
(1997)
‘Rhetorisches Handeln in der internationalen Politik’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen4(2):
219-254
.
124.
Schimmelfennig, Frank
(2000)
‘International Socialization in the New Europe: Rational Action
in an Institutional Environment’
, European Journal of International Relations6(1):
109-139
.
125.
Schimmelfennig, Frank
(2003) The EU, NATO, and the Integration of Europe: Rules and
Rhetoric.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
126.
Schneider, Gerald
(1994)
‘Rational Choice und kommunikatives Handeln. Eine Replik auf
Harald Müller’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen1(2):
357-366
.
127.
Schoppa, Leonard J.
(1999)
‘The Social Context in Coercive International Bargaining’
, International Organization53(2):
307-342
.
128.
Searle, John
(1969) Speech Acts.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
129.
Searle, John R.
(1997) Die Konstruktion der gesellschaftlichen Wirklichkeit.
Zur Ontologie sozialer Tatsachen, Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt (original title:
The Construction of Social Reality.
New York: Free Press
, 1995).
130.
Sending, Ole Jacob
(2002)
‘Constitution, Choice and Change: Problems with the
“Logic of Appropriateness” and its Use in Constructivist Theory’
, European Journal of International Relations8(4):
443-470
.
131.
Sharp, Paul
(1999)
‘For Diplomacy: Representation and the Study of International Relations’
, International Studies Reveiw1(1):
33-57
.
132.
Siegman, Henry
(2002)
‘Sharon Rewrites the Peace Script’
, International Herald Tribune12 June, p.
8
.
133.
Simon, Herbert
(1976) Administrative Behaviour.
New York: Free Press
.
134.
Simon, Herbert
(1983) Reason in Human Affairs.
Stanford: Stanford University Press
.
135.
Steffek, Jens
(2003)
‘The Legitimation of International Governance: A Discourse Approach’
, European Journal of International Relations9(2):
249-276
.
136.
Stinchcombe, Arthur. L.
(1986)
‘Reason and Rationality’
, Sociological Theory4:
151-166
.
137.
Stoker, Laura
(1992)
‘Interest and Ethics in Politics’
, American Political Science Review86:
369-380
.
138.
Tarrow, Sidney
(2001)
‘Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in
International Politics’
, Annual Review of Political Science4:
1-20
.
139.
Waltz, Kenneth N.
(1979) Theory of International Politics.
New York: Random House
.
140.
Watson, Adam
(1982) Diplomacy — The Dialogue Between
States.
London: Eyre Methuen
.
141.
Wendt, Alexander
(1987)
‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’
, International Organization41(3):
335-370
.
142.
Wendt, Alexander
(1999) Social Theory of International Politics.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
143.
Wheeler, Nicholas J.
(2000) Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in
International Society.
Oxford: Oxford University Press
.
144.
Willems, Ulrich
(1998) Entwicklung, Interesse und Moral. Die
Entwicklungspolitik der Evangelischen Kirche in Deutschland.
Opladen: Leske & Budrich
.
145.
Willems, Ulrich
(2003) ‘Moralskepsis, Interessenreduktionismus
und Strategien der Förderung von Demokratie und Gemeinwohl. Eine
kritische Sichtung politiktheoretischer Reflexionen über Interesse und
Moral als Orientierungen politischen Handelns’, in
U. Willems
(ed.) Interesse und Moral als Orientierungen politischen Handelns,
pp. 9-98.
Baden-Baden: Nomos
.
146.
Williamson, Oliver
(1986) Economic Organization. Firms, Markets and Policy
Control.
Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books
.
147.
Zangl, Bernhard
and
Michael Zürn
(1996)
‘Argumentatives Handeln bei internationalen Verhandlungen.
Moderate Anmerkungen zur post-realistischen Debatte’
, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen3(2):
341-366
.
148.
Zartmann, William
(1999) ‘Introduction: Negotiating
Cultures’, in
Peter Bertonet al.
(eds) International Negotiation. Actors, Structure/Process,
Values, pp. 1-10.
London: Macmillan
.
149.
Zellner, Wolfgang
(1994) Die Verhandlungen über konventionelle
Streitkräfte in Europa: konventionelle Rüstungskontrolle, die
neue Lage in Europa und die Rolle der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.
Baden-Baden: Nomos
.
