ManuliAMaggioMGTripoliD, et al. Patients’ perspective and usability of innovation technology in a new rehabilitation pathway: An exploratory study in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord2020; 44: 102312.
2.
MoroneGPaolucciSCherubiniA, et al. Robot-assisted gait training for stroke patients: Current state of the art and perspectives of robotics. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat2017; 13: 1303–1311.
3.
SwinnenEBeckweeDPinteD, et al. Treadmill training in multiple sclerosis: Can body weight support or robot assistance provide added value? A systematic review. Mult Scler Int2012; 2012: 240274.
4.
LamersIFeysPSwinnenE.Chapter 18: Robot-assisted rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Overview of approaches, clinical outcomes, and perspectives. In: ColomboRSanguinetiV (eds) Rehabilitation robotics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, pp. 253–266.
5.
FeysPStraudiS.Beyond therapists: Technology-aided physical MS rehabilitation delivery. Mult Scler2019; 25(10): 1387–1393.
6.
StraudiSManfrediniFLambertiN, et al. Robot-assisted gait training is not superior to intensive overground walking in multiple sclerosis with severe disability (the RAGTIME study): A randomized controlled trial. Mult Scler2020; 26(6): 716–724.
7.
McGibbonCASextonAJayaramanA, et al. Evaluation of the Keeogo exoskeleton for assisting ambulatory activities in people with multiple sclerosis: An open-label, randomized, cross-over trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil2018; 15(1): 117.
8.
KozlowskiAJFabianMLadD, et al. Feasibility and safety of a powered exoskeleton for assisted walking for persons with multiple sclerosis: A single-group preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2017; 98(7): 1300–1307.
