Advances in wearable and wireless biosensing technology pave the way for a brave new world of novel multiple sclerosis (MS) outcome measures. Our current tools for examining patients date back to the 19th century and while invaluable to the neurologist invite accompaniment from these new technologies and artificial intelligence (AI) analytical methods. While the most common biosensor tool used in MS publications to date is the accelerometer, the landscape is changing quickly with multi-sensor applications, electrodermal sensors, and wireless radiofrequency waves. Some caution is warranted to ensure novel outcomes have clear clinical relevance and stand-up to the rigors of reliability, reproducibility, and precision, but the ultimate implementation of biosensing in the MS clinical setting is inevitable.
LanskaDJ. The history of reflex hammers. Neurology1989; 39(11): 1542–1549.
2.
RumpfH. Uber einen Fall von Syringomyelie nebst Beitrag zur Untersuchung der Sensibilitat. Neurologisches Zentralblatt, 1889.
3.
PearceJM. Early days of the tuning fork. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1998; 65(5): 728733.
4.
YousefAJonzzonSSuleimanL, et al. Biosensing in multiple sclerosis. Expert Rev Med Devices2017; 14(11): 901–912.
5.
MansourianNRahaieMHosseiniM. A nanobiosensor based on fluorescent DNA-hosted silver nanocluster and HCR amplification for detection of MicroRNA involved in progression of multiple sclerosis. J Fluoresc2017; 27(5): 1679–1685.
6.
DerkusBAcar BozkurtPTuluM, et al. Simultaneous quantification of myelin basic protein and tau proteins in cerebrospinal fluid and serum of multiple sclerosis patients using nanoimmunosensor. Biosens Bioelectron2017; 89(Pt. 2): 781–788.
7.
BlockVJLizeeACrabtree-HartmanE, et al. Continuous daily assessment of multiple sclerosis disability using remote step count monitoring. J Neurol2017; 264(2): 316–326.
8.
HaleLAPalJBeckerI. Measuring free-living physical activity in adults with and without neurologic dysfunction with a triaxial accelerometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2008; 89(9): 1765–1771.
9.
BusseMEPearsonORVan DeursenR, et al. Quantified measurement of activity provides insight into motor function and recovery in neurological disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2004; 75(6): 884–888.
10.
MotlRWWeikertMSuhY, et al. Accuracy of the actibelt(®) accelerometer for measuring walking speed in a controlled environment among persons with multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture2012; 35(2): 192–196.
11.
CraigJJBruetschAPLynchSG, et al. Instrumented balance and walking assessments in persons with multiple sclerosis show strong test-retest reliability. J Neuroeng Rehabil2017; 14(1): 43.
12.
GreeneBRHealyMRutledgeS, et al. Quantitative assessment of multiple sclerosis using inertial sensors and the TUG test. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2014; 2014: 2977–2980.
13.
BambergSJBenbasatAYScarboroughDM, et al. Gait analysis using a shoe-integrated wireless sensor system. IEEE T Inf Technol Biomed2008; 12(4): 413–423.
14.
ShoaibMBoschSIncelOD, et al. Fusion of smartphone motion sensors for physical activity recognition. Sensors2014; 14(6): 10146–10176.
15.
MoonYMcGinnisRSSeagersK, et al. Monitoring gait in multiple sclerosis with novel wearable motion sensors. PLoS ONE2017; 12(2): e0171346.
16.
CarpinellaICattaneoDFerrarinM. Hilbert-Huang transform based instrumental assessment of intention tremor in multiple sclerosis. J Neural Eng2015; 12(4): 046011.
17.
SpainRISt GeorgeRJSalarianA, et al. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture2012; 35(4): 573–578.
18.
RudickRAMillerDBethouxF, et al. The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-based disability assessment tool. J Vis Exp2014; 88: e51318.
19.
ReilmannRHoltberndFBachmannR, et al. Grasping multiple sclerosis: Do quantitative motor assessments provide a link between structure and function. J Neurol2013; 260(2): 407–414.
20.
Lopez-MartinezDPicardR. Wearable technologies for multiple sclerosis: The future role of wearable stress measurement in improving quality of life. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on smart portable, wearable, implantable and disability-oriented devices and systems (SPWID’16), Valencia, 22–26 May 2016.
YuFBilbergAStenagerE. Wireless medical sensor measurements of fatigue in patients with multiple sclerosis. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2010; 2010: 3763–3767.
23.
AdibFKabelacZKatabiD. 3D tracking via body radio reflections. In: Proceedings of the 11th USENIX conference on networked systems design and implementation, Seattle, WA, 2–4 April 2014.
24.
Adib FaKD. See through walls with Wi-Fi! ACM SIGCOMM. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2013 conference on SIGCOMM, Hong Kong, China, 12–16 August 2013.
25.
AdibFKabelacZKatabiD. Multi-person localization via RF body reflections. In: Proceedings of the 12th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI ’15), Oakland, CA, 4–6 May 2015.
26.
HsuCYLiuYKabelacZ, et al. Extracting gait velocity and stride length from surrounding radio signals. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Denver, CO, 6–11 May 2017.
27.
KumarPLeeHJ. Security issues in healthcare applications using wireless medical sensor networks: A survey. Sensors2012; 12(1): 55–91.
