Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) mainly presents amongst those of working age. Depending upon the type of MS, many people embark upon a long period of managing their day-to-day work-related needs in the face of intermittent and sometimes persistent disabling symptoms. The objective of this study was to explore the concept of work instability (WI) following the onset of MS and develop a Work Instability Scale (WIS) specific to this population.
Method: WI amongst those with MS in work was explored through qualitative interviews which were then used to generate items for a WIS. Rasch analysis was used to refine the scaling properties of the MS-WIS, which was then validated against expert vocational assessment by occupational health physiotherapists and ergonomists.
Results: The resulting measure is a 22-item, self-administered scale which can be scored in three bands indicating low, medium and high risk of WI (job retention) problems. The scale meets modern psychometric requirements for measurement, indicated by adequate fit to the Rasch model with absence of local dependency and differential item functioning (DIF) by age, gender and hours worked.
Conclusions: The scale presents an opportunity in routine clinical practice to take positive action to reduce sickness absence and prevent job loss.
KornblithABLa RoccaNGBaumHM. Employment in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res1986; 9: 155–165.
2.
RaoSMLeoGJEllingtonLNauertzTBernardinLUnverzagtF. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: II. Impact upon employment and social functioning. Neurology1991; 41: 692–696.
3.
JulianLJVellaLVollmerT. Employment in multiple sclerosis. Exiting and re-entering the work force. J Neurol2008; 255: 1354–1360.
4.
BourdetteDNProchazakaAVMitchellWLicariPBurksJ. Health care costs of veterans with MS: implications for the rehabilitation of MS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1993; 73: 25–31.
5.
SolariARadiceD. Health status of people with multiple sclerosis: a community mail survey. Neurol Sci2001; 22: 307–315.
6.
BeattyWMBlancoCRWilbanksSLPaulRHHamesKA. Demographic, clinical, and cognitive characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients who continue to work. J Neurol Rehab1995; 9: 167–173.
7.
GronningMHannisdalEMellgrenSI. Multivariate analysis of factors associated with unemployment in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1990; 53: 388–390.
8.
BuscheKDFiskJDMurrayTJMetzLM. Short term predictors of unemployment in multiple sclerosis patients. Can J Neurol Sci2003; 30: 137–142.
9.
LaRoccaNKalbRKendallPScheinbergL. The role of disease and demographic factors in the employment of patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol1982; 39: 256.
10.
GladSBNylandHAarsethJHRiiseTMyhrKM. How long can you keep working with benign multiple sclerosis?J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2011; 82: 78–82.
11.
DyckIJongbloedL. Women with multiple sclerosis and employment issues: a focus on social and institutional environments. Can J Occup Ther2000; 67: 337–346.
12.
YorskstonKJohnsonKKlasnerEAmtmannDKuehnCDudgeonB. Getting the work done: a qualitative study of individuals with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil2003: 25: 369–379.
13.
GilworthGChamberlainMAHarveyAWoodhouseASmithJSmythMG. Development of a Work Instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum2003; 49: 349–354.
14.
GilworthGCareyAEyresSSloanJRainfordBBodenhamD. Screening for job loss: development of a Work Instability scale for traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj2006; 20: 835–843.
15.
KremenchutskyMCottrelDRiceG. The natural history: a geographically based study. Progressive-relapsing and relapsing-progressive multiple sclerosis: a re-evaluation. Brain1999; 122: 1941–1950.
16.
MacDonaldIComptonAEdanGGoodkinDHartungHPLublinFD. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Guidelines from the International Panel of the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol2001; 50: 121–127.
17.
HobartJLampingDFitzpatrickRRiaziAThompsonA. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): a new patient-based outcome measure. Brain2001; 124: 962–973.
18.
FiskJDRitvoPGRossLHaaseDAMarrieTJSchlechWF. Measuring the functional impact of fatigue: initial validation of the fatigue impact scale. Clin Infect Dis1994; 18: S79–83.
19.
FordHLGerryETennantAWhalleyDHaighRJohbsonMH. Developing a disease specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil2001; 15: 247–258.
20.
RaschG. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
TennantAConaghanPG. The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: what is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?Arthritis Rheum2007; 57: 1358–1362.
23.
GuttmanLA. The basis for Scalogram analysis. In: StoufferSAGuttmanLASuchmanFALazarsfeldPFStarSAClausenJA (eds) Studies in social psychology in World War II: Vol 4. Measurement and prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1950, pp. 60–90.
24.
SmithRM. Fit analysis in latent trait measurement models. J Appl Meas2000; 2: 199–218.
25.
CronbachLJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika1951; 16: 297–334.
26.
SmithEV. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas2002; 3: 205–231.
TangKBeatonDEGignacMALacailleDZhangWBombardierC. The Work Instability scale for rheumatoid arthritis (RA-WIS) predicts arthritis-related work transitions within 12 months. Arthritis Care Res2010; 62: 1578–1587.
