Maintaining paid work is a key issue for people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Different factors, including psychological attributes, can influence job retention. Understanding their role should inform potential interventions to help PwMS retain employment.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to identify the key factors which improve job retention in an employed cohort of PwMS.
Methods:
This three-year longitudinal study used validated self-completed measures of physical and psychological factors at four time points over 28 months.
Results:
Of 208 employed PwMS, just over 1 in 10 was no longer working at the end of the study. Three variables were predictive of continuing employment; low ‘work instability’ at baseline increased the odds of job retention by a factor of 12.76; high levels of self-efficacy by a factor of 4.66 and being less than 50 years of age increased the odds of job retention by a factor of 3.90. Path analysis demonstrated the mediating role of self-efficacy between the physical impact of MS and the level of work instability at exit.
Conclusion:
Screening for work instability and self-efficacy in a clinical setting followed by appropriate interventions to increase self-efficacy and reduce work instability could aid job retention in MS.
KrauseIKernSHorntrichAet al. Employment status in multiple sclerosis: Impact of disease-specific and non-disease-specific factors. Mult Scler2013; 19(13): 1792–1799.
2.
JulianLJVellaLVollmerTet al. Employment in multiple sclerosis. Exiting and re-entering the work force. J Neurol2008; 255(9): 1354–1360.
3.
KornblithABRoccaNGLBaumHM.Employment in individuals with multiple sclerosis. Int J Rehabil Res1986; 9(2): 155–165.
4.
RaoSMLeoGJEllingtonLet al. Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology1991; 41(5): 692–696.
5.
RumrillPDJr.Challenges and opportunities related to the employment of people with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil2009; 31(2): 83–90.
6.
RumrillPDFraserRTJohnsonKL.Employment and workplace accommodation outcomes among participants in a vocational consultation service for people with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil2013; 39(2): 85–90.
7.
RaggiACovelliVSchiavolinSet al. Work-related problems in multiple sclerosis: A literature review on its associates and determinants. Disabil Rehabil2015; 38(10): 936–944.
8.
KrokavcovaMNagyovaIVan DijkJPet al. Self-rated health and employment status in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil2010; 32(21): 1742–1748.
9.
SweetlandJHowseEPlayfordED. A systematic review of research undertaken in vocational rehabilitation for people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil2012; 34(24): 2031–2038.
10.
UccelliMSpecchiaCBattagliaMAet al. Factors that influence the employment status of people with multiple sclerosis: A multi-national study. J Neurol2009; 256(12): 1989–1996.
11.
WicksCRWardKStroudAet al. Multiple sclerosis and employment: Associations of psychological factors and work instability. J Rehabil Med2016; 48(9): 799–805.
12.
McFaddenEHortonMCFordHLet al. Screening for the risk of job loss in multiple sclerosis (MS): Development of an MS-specific Work Instability Scale (MS-WIS). Mult Scler2012; 18(6): 862–870.
13.
PolmanCHReingoldSCBanwellBet al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol2011; 69(2): 292–302.
14.
McDonaldWIHartungH-PPolmanCHet al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the international panel on the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol2001; 50: 121–127.
15.
MillsRJYoungCAPallantJFet al. Development of a patient reported outcome scale for fatigue in multiple sclerosis: The neurological fatigue index (NFI-MS). Health Qual Life Outcomes2010; 8: 22.
16.
HobartJLampingDFitzpatrickRet al. The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29): A new patient-based outcome measure. Brain2001; 124: 962–973.
17.
HonarmandKFeinsteinA.Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for use with multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler2009; 15(12): 1518–1524.
18.
GlaesmerHRiefWMartinAet al. Psychometric properties and population-based norms of the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R). Br J Health Psychol2012; 17(2): 432–445.
19.
StuifbergenABeckerHBlozisSet al. Conceptualization and development of the Acceptance of Chronic Health Conditions Scale. Issues Ment Health Nurs2008; 29(2): 101–114.
20.
YoungCAMillsRJWoolmoreJet al. The unidimensional self-efficacy scale for MS (USE-MS): Developing a patient based and patient reported outcome. Mult Scler2012; 18(9): 1326–1333.
21.
FordHLGerryETennantAet al. Developing a disease-specific quality of life measure for people with multiple sclerosis. Clin Rehabil2001; 15(3): 247–258.
22.
TennantRHillerLFishwickRet al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): Development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes2007; 5: 63.
23.
KurtzkeJF.Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology1983; 33: 1444–1452.
24.
RaschG.Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1960.
25.
AndrichD.Components of variance of scales with a bifactor subscale structure from two calculations of alpha. Educ Meas: Issue Pract2016; 35: 25–30.
RochaNSChachamovichEde Almeida FleckMPet al. An introduction to Rasch analysis for psychiatric practice and research. J Psychiatr Res2013; 47(2): 141–148.
28.
TomarkenAJWallerNG.Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol2005; 1: 31–65.
RoesslerRRumrillPHennesseyM.Employment concerns of people with multiple sclerosis: Building a national employment agenda. Kent, OH: Kent State University Center for Disability Studies, 2002.
31.
RoesslerRTRumrillPDLiJet al. Predictors of differential employment statuses of adults with multiple sclerosis. J Vocat Rehabil2015; 42: 141–152.
32.
VanderWeeleTJ.Mediation analysis: A practitioner’s guide. Annu Rev Public Health2016; 37: 17–32.
33.
BanduraAWoodR.Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol1989; 56(5): 805–814.
