Clean intermittent self-catheterization in persons with multiple sclerosis: the influence of cognitive dysfunction

Abstract

Background

Bladder problems are very common in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS).

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the ability of PwMS to learn clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC).

Methods

The physical disability of 23 PwMS was evaluated with the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and cognitive status was evaluated with the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests (BRB-N). CISC was taught by the same continence advisor who was blinded to the cognitive test results. The ability to learn CISC was evaluated immediately after sessions and 3 months later. Twenty-three consecutive PwMS participated in the study.

Results

In all, 87% (20/23) of the PwMS successfully finished CISC training. The number of lessons needed to acquire CISC skills differed significantly depending on the EDSS (Spearman r = 0.682, P = 0.0003), but the total cognitive decline subscore did not influence the ability to learn CISC. Only 13% (3/23) of the PwMS failed to learn CISC. The ability to learn CISC depended on the number of lessons needed to acquire CISC (r = −0.499, P = 0.0313) and the EDSS score (r = −0.433, P = 0.0390) but not on the course of the disease (r = 0.125, P = 0.5696) or on cognitive decline (r = −0.311, P = 0.1480). After 3 months of follow-up, 30% (6/20) of the PwMS had ceased performing CISC. A follow-up indicated no statistically significant correlations among any of the subscores of the cognitive test battery, the EDSS score, the course of the disease, and the time required to learn CISC and effective bladder management.

Conclusions

Our study thus confirmed that most (87%) PwMS were able to learn CISC in spite of cognitive dysfunction and therefore to improve their quality of life.

Keywords

bladder management clean intermittent self-catheterization cognitive dysfunction multiple sclerosis rehabilitation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Petersen T De Ridder D Fowler CJ . The SUBDIMS Working Group. Bladder disorders in multiple sclerosis. In: P Ketelaer M Prosiegel M Battaglia M Messmer-Uccelli , (eds), A problem oriented approach in multiple sclerosis. Leuven: Uitgeverij Acco; 1997, p. 239–251.

2 DasGupta R Fowler CJ . Bladder, bowel and sexual dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: management strategies. Drugs 2003; 63: 153–166.

3 Gross-Paju K Sema L Zopp I . Analysis of Fowler bladder management algorithm. Int J MS Care 2002; 4: 79.

4 Rao SM Leo GJ Bernardin L Unverzagt F . Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. I. Frequency, patterns, and prediction. Neurology 1991; 41: 685–691.

5 Bagert B Camplair P Bourdette D . Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis – natural history, pathophysiology and management. CNS Drugs 2002; 16: 445–455.

6 Wilken JA Kane R Sullivan CL . The utility of computerized neuropsychological assessment of cognitive dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2003; 9: 119–127.

7 Rao SM Leo GJ Ellington L . Cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. II. Impact on employment and social functioning. Neurology 1991; 41: 692–696.

8 Hämäläinen P Ruutiainen J . Cognitive decline in multiple sclerosis. Int MS J 1999; 6: 50–57.

9 Fischer JS Foley FW Aikens JE Erickson GD Rao SM Shindell S . What do we really know about cognitive dysfunction, affective disorders and stress in multiple sclerosis? A practitioner’s guide. J Neurol Rehabil 1994; 8: 151–164.

10.

10 Rao SM Aubin-Faubert P Leo GJ . Information processing speed in patients with multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989; 11: 471–477.

11.

11 Kujala P Portin R Revonsuo A Ruutiainen J . Automatic and controlled information processing in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1994; 117: 1115–1126.

12.

12 Elpern SJ Gunderson CH Kattah J Kirsch AD . Cognitive and memory functioning in recently diagnosed chronic multiple sclerosis. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Neuropsychological Society, Houston, USA; 1984.

13.

13 Heaton RK Nelson LM Thompson DS Burks JS Franklin GM . Neuropsychological findings in relapsing-remitting and chronic-progressive multiple sclerosis. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985; 53: 103–110.

14.

14 Rao SM . Neuropsychology of multiple sclerosis: a critical review. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1986; 8: 503–542.

15.

15 Rao SM Leo GJ St. Aubin-Faubert P . On the nature of memory disturbance in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1989; 11: 699–712.

16.

16 Heath A Gaudino EA DeLuca J Ricker JH . Learning impairment is associated with recall ability in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2000; 6: 865–873.

17.

17 Thornton AE Raz N . Memory impairment in multiple sclerosis: a quantitative review. Neuropsychology 1997; 11: 357–366.

18.

18 Chiaravalloti ND Demaree H Gaudino EA DeLuca J . Can the repetition effect maximize learning in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 58–68.

19.

19 Marrie RA Chelune GJ Miller DM Cohen JA . Subjective cognitive complaints relate to mild impairment of cognition in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2005; 11: 69–75.

20.

20 McDonald WI Compston A Edan G . Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001; 50: 121–127.

21.

21 Rao SM . A manual for the brief repeatable battery of neuropsychological tests in multiple sclerosis. New York: NMSS; 1990.