Current indoor acoustic models mainly use sound pressure level cutoffs or occupant surveys, missing an interpretable, multi-factor index that links objective metrics with perceived indoor acoustic conditions. This paper introduces a fuzzy-logic Acoustic Comfort Index (ACI) that integrates six inputs: sound pressure level, dominant frequency, emission pattern, masking condition, acoustic criticality, and noise variability, into a continuous 0–1 score (lower indicating greater comfort) with categorical interpretation. The framework is conceptually informed by the ISO/TS 12913 soundscape paradigm, emphasizing contextual and perceptual aspects without relying on survey-based inputs. A 2025-rule Mamdani system is generated through automated rule construction. Model benchmarking includes 1000 randomized cases and 16 representative indoor scenarios. Local sensitivity analysis quantifies variable influence, while a ridge-regularized GAM surrogate confirms expected monotonic behavior and yields strong hold-out agreement. PCA clustering identifies comfort regimes that support practical diagnostic use. Benchmarking against SPL-only and reduced models illustrates the added value of contextual and perceptual variables. A MATLAB ACI Calculator App enables practical application from direct inputs or audio recordings, with calibrated inputs used for absolute SPL estimation.
TorresinSAlbaticiRAlettaF, et al. Assessment methods and factors determining positive indoor soundscapes in residential buildings: a systematic review. Sustainability2019; 11: 5290. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195290
6.
TorresinSAlettaFObermanT, et al. Measuring, representing and analysing indoor soundscapes: a data collection campaign in residential buildings with natural and mechanical ventilation in England. Build Environ2023; 243: 110726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110726
7.
TorresinSAlettaFDicleS, et al. Towards developing a model of adaptive acoustic comfort in the built environment: a thematic analysis from an expert focus group. Build Environ2024; 266: 112074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.112074
8.
TorresinSAlbaticiRAlettaF, et al. Indoor soundscape assessment: a principal components model of acoustic perception in residential buildings. Build Environ2020; 182: 107152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107152
9.
AlettaFKangJAxelssonÖ.Soundscape descriptors and a conceptual framework for developing predictive soundscape models. Landsc Urban Plan2016; 149: 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.02.001
10.
TorresinSAlettaFBabichF, et al. Acoustics for supportive and healthy buildings: emerging themes on indoor soundscape research. Sustainability2020; 12: 6054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156054
11.
WestBDeucharsAAli-MacLachlanI.Office soundscape assessment: a model of acoustic environment perception in open-plan offices. J Acoust Soc Am2024; 156: 2949–2959. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0034230
MinichilliFGoriniFAscariE, et al. Annoyance judgment and measurements of environmental noise: a focus on Italian secondary schools. Int J Environ Res Public Health2018; 15: 208.
YanHPanYLiZ, et al. Further development of a thermal comfort based fuzzy logic controller for a direct expansion air conditioning system. Appl Energy2018; 219: 312–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.045
DionovaBWMohammedMNAl-ZubaidiS, et al. Environment indoor air quality assessment using fuzzy inference system. ICT Express2020; 6: 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icte.2020.05.007
18.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12913-1:2014 acoustics – soundscape – part 1: definition and conceptual framework. ISO, 2014.
19.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12913-2:2018 acoustics – soundscape – part 2: data collection and reporting requirements. ISO, 2018.
20.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 12913-3:2022 acoustics – soundscape – part 3: data analysis. ISO, 2022.
AstutiRDSuhardiBLaksonoPW, et al. Investigating the relationship between noise exposure and human cognitive performance: attention, stress, and mental workload based on EEG signals using power spectrum density. Appl Sci2024; 14: 2699. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072699
25.
SzalmaJLHancockPA.Noise effects on human performance: a meta-analytic synthesis. Psychol Bull2011; 137: 682–707. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023987
SukowskiH.Effects of noise on employees during a concentration task: results from performance and subjective assessments and a critical view of the chosen performance test. Appl Acoust2025; 231: 110533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2025.110533
28.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 3382-3:2022 acoustics – measurement of room acoustic parameters – part 3: open plan offices. ISO, 2022.
29.
GuskiRSchreckenbergDSchuemerR.WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European Region: a systematic review on environmental noise and annoyance. Int J Environ Res Public Health2017; 14: 1539. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14121539
BoycePR (ed.). Human factors in lighting. 2nd ed.CRC Press, 2003.
32.
AlhamadIM.Visual comfort index (VCI): an interpretable fuzzy-logic model for human-centric indoor artificial lighting. Build Environ2026; 287: 113872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113872
ASHRAE. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2023: thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, 2023.
35.
CiabattoniLCiminiGFerracutiF, et al. Indoor thermal comfort control through fuzzy logic PMV optimization. In: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), 2015, pp.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2015.7280698.
36.
Rajeswari SubramaniamKChengCTPangTY. Fuzzy logic controlled simulation in regulating thermal comfort and indoor air quality using a vehicle heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning system. Sensors2023; 23: 1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23031395
37.
PradityoFSuranthaN.Indoor air quality monitoring and controlling system based on IoT and fuzzy logic. In: 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT), 2019, pp.1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2019.8835246.
38.
AlhamadIMSaraijiR.Fuzzibility: a new approach to modeling visibility using fuzzy techniques. J Archit Eng2023; 29(1): 04022042. https://doi.org/10.1061/jaeied.aeeng-1405
39.
BotteldoorenDVerkeynA.Fuzzy models for accumulation of reported community noise annoyance from combined sources. J Acoust Soc Am2002; 112: 1496–1508. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1506366
40.
BotteldoorenDVerkeynALercherP.A fuzzy rule based framework for noise annoyance modeling. J Acoust Soc Am2003; 114: 1487–1498. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1604125
41.
Fernandez-PrietoJACanada-BagoJBirkelU.A fuzzy rule-based system to infer subjective noise annoyance using an experimental wireless acoustic sensor network. Smart Cities2022; 5: 1574–1589. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5040080
BoyerJP.Fuzzy logic device for automatic sound control. US patent US5844992A, 1998.
44.
KipersztokOHammondR. The use of fuzzy logic in active noise control. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis and the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society Conference, 1995, p.577–582. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISUMA.1995.527759.
45.
ZaheeruddinG.A neuro-fuzzy approach for prediction of human work efficiency in noisy environment. Appl Soft Comput2006; 6: 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2005.02.001
46.
JainVKJainVK.An expert system for predicting the effects of speech interference due to noise pollution on humans using fuzzy approach. Expert Syst Appl2008; 35: 1978–1988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.104
47.
MaristanyALópezMRRiveraCA.Soundscape quality analysis by fuzzy logic: a field study in Cordoba, Argentina. Appl Acoust2016; 111: 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.04.013
AlhamadIMHamdanAM.A fuzzy-based smart HVAC controller for mosque buildings: a design procedure under Dubai climate. In: 2021 6th International Conference on Renewable Energy: Generation and Applications (ICREGA), 2021, p.119–124. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICREGA50506.2021.9388279.
50.
BiesDAHansenCH (eds). Engineering noise control: theory and practice. 3rd ed.CRC Press, 2003.
51.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 1996-2:2017 acoustics – description, measurement and assessment of environmental noise – part 2: determination of sound pressure levels. ISO, 2017.
52.
ANSI/ASA. ANSI/ASA S12.12-1992 (R2024): engineering method for determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound pressure: precision method for anechoic and hemi-anechoic rooms. American National Standards Institute and Acoustical Society of America, 2024.
53.
KryterKD.The effects of noise on man. Elsevier, 2013.
54.
BerglundBHassménPJobRF.Sources and effects of low-frequency noise. J Acoust Soc Am1996; 99: 2985–3002. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414863
55.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 226:2023 acoustics – normal equal-loudness-level contours. ISO, 2023.
56.
OlivaDHongistoVKeränenJ, et al. Measurement of low frequency noise in rooms. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, 2011.
ForssénJZachosGRosas PerezC, et al. A model study of low-frequency noise exposure indoors due to road traffic. Build Acoust2023; 30: 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X221143571
BrocoliniLParizetEChevretP.Effect of masking noise on cognitive performance and annoyance in open plan offices. Appl Acoust2016; 114: 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.07.012
67.
ClaaßenETöpkenSvan de ParS.The influence of the reference level on loudness and preference judgements for spectrally manipulated fan sounds. J Acoust Soc Am2024; 155: 1735–1746. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0025161
PedryczWGomideF.Fuzzy systems engineering: toward human-centric computing. John Wiley & Sons, 2007.
72.
MendelJM.Explainable uncertain rule-based fuzzy systems. Springer International Publishing, 2024.
73.
LillyJH.Fuzzy control and identification. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.
74.
SpandagosCNgTL.Fuzzy model of residential energy decision-making considering behavioral economic concepts. Appl Energy2018; 213: 611–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.112
75.
AlHamadIMAl HemyariOShashatiA, et al. An integrated approach to water conservation: fuzzy logic assessment of water tariffs in Abu Dhabi Emirate’s residential sector. Bull Natl Res Cent2023; 47: 160. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-023-01130-w
76.
BaiYWangD.Fundamentals of fuzzy logic control—fuzzy sets, fuzzy rules and defuzzifications. In: BaiYZhuangHWangD (eds) Advanced fuzzy logic technologies in industrial applications. Springer, 2006, pp.17–36.
77.
ElkanoMGalarMSanzJA, et al. Consensus via penalty functions for decision making in ensembles in fuzzy rule-based classification systems. Appl Soft Comput2018; 67: 728–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.05.050
