Different numerical techniques have been used in the last decades for the acoustic characterization and performance optimization of sound diffusive surfaces. However, these methods require very long calculation times and do not provide a rapid feedback. As a result, these methods can hardly be applied by designers at early stages of the design process, when successive design iterations are necessary from an aesthetic point of view. A suitable alternative could be the use of parametric modeling in combination with performance investigations during the design process of sound diffusive surfaces. To this aim, this study presents a design process for diffusive surfaces topology optimization based on the combination of parametric models and geometrical acoustic simulations. It aims to provide architects and designers with rapid visual feedback on acoustic performances at a preliminary stage of the design process. The method has been tested on different case studies, which have been modelled based on geometric guidelines for diffusive surface optimization. The sensitivity of the method showed that it could be a very useful tool for comparisons among surface design alternatives. Finally, the advantages and limitations of the integrated optimization in comparison with conventional optimizations are discussed.
CoxTJ.Fast time domain modeling of surface scattering from reflectors and diffusers. J Acoust Soc Am2015; 137: EL483–EL489.
3.
RedondoJSánchez-PérezJBlascoX, et al. Optimized sound diffusers based on sonic crystals using a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm. J Acoust Soc Am2016; 139: 2807–2814.
4.
MeyerJLokkiT. Optimization of a diffuser geometry using parametric modeling tools and finite-difference time-domain simulations. In: Proceedings of the IOA, Institute of Acoustics, Hamburg, Germany, 4–5 October 2018, pp.638–645.
5.
RobinsonPWPätynenJLokkiT, et al. The role of diffusive architectural surfaces on auditory spatial discrimination in performance venues. J Acoust Soc Am2013; 133: 3940–3950.
6.
JeonJYJoHISeoR, et al. Objective and subjective assessment of sound diffuseness in musical venues via computer simulations and a scale model. Build Environ2020; 173: 106740.
7.
ShtrepiLDi BlasioSAstolfiA.Listeners sensitivity to different locations of diffusive surfaces in performance spaces: the case of a shoebox concert hall. Appl Sci2020; 10: 4370.
8.
ShtrepiLAstolfiAD’AntonioG, et al. Objective and perceptual evaluation of distance-dependent scattered sound effects in a small variable-acoustics hall. J Acoust Soc Am2016; 140: 3651–3662.
9.
BadinoEShtrepiLAstolfiA.Acoustic performance-based design: a brief overview of the opportunities and limits in current practice. Acoustics2020; 2: 246–278.
10.
ISO 17497-1:2004. Acoustics—sound-scattering properties of surfaces—part 1: measurement of the random-incidence scattering coefficient in a reverberation room, 2004.
11.
ISO 17497-2:2012. Acoustics—sound-scattering properties of surfaces—part 2: measurement of the directional diffusion coefficient in a free field, 2012.
12.
BonwetschTBaertschiROesterleS. Adding performance criteria to digital fabrication room-acoustical information of diffuse respondent panels. In: Proceedings 28th ACADIA, in silicon + skin, biological processes and computation, The Association for Computer Aided Design in Architecture, Minneapolis, USA, 16–19 October 2008, pp.364–369.
PetersB.Acoustic performance as a design driver: sound simulation and parametric modeling using smartgeometry. Int J Archit Comput2010; 8: 337–358.
16.
PetersBOlesenT. Integrating sound scattering measurements in the design of complex architectural surfaces: informing a parametric design strategy with acoustic measurements from rapid prototype scale models. In: Future cities: 28th eCAADe conference proceedings, The Association for Education and research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, 15–18 September 2010, Zurich, Switzerland, pp.481–491.
17.
ShtrepiLMenichelliJAstolfiA, et al. Improving scattering surface design with rapid feedback by integrating parametric models and acoustic simulation. J Acoust Soc Am2017; 142: 2499.
18.
KohlerMGramazioFWillmannJ.The robotic touch: how robots change architecture, Zürich: Park Books, 2014.
19.
ReinhardtDCabreraDJungA, et al. Towards a micro design of acoustic surfaces. In: Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Springer Nature Switzerland, 2016, pp.137–151.
20.
ShtrepiL.Advances in diffusive surface design using 3D architectural parametric modelling programs. In: Proceedings ICA, Aachen, 9–13 September 2019.
21.
WortmannTTuncerB.Differentiating parametric design: digital workflows in contemporary architecture and construction. Des Stud2017; 52: 173–197.
22.
WhiteheadH. Laws of form. In: KolarevicB (ed.) Architecture in the digital age: design and manufacturing, 2003, pp.89–113. Oxfordshire, UK: Taylor & Francis.
23.
ShtrepiLAstolfiAPelzerS, et al. Objective and perceptual assessment of the scattered sound field in a simulated concert hall. J Acoust Soc Am2015; 138: 1485–1497.
24.
ShtrepiL.Investigation on the diffusive surface modeling detail in geometrical acoustics based simulations. J Acoust Soc Am2019; 145: EL215–EL221.
25.
ShtrepiLAstolfiAPuglisiGE, et al. Effects of the distance from a diffusive surface on the objective and perceptual evaluation of the sound field in a small simulated variable-acoustics hall. Appl Sci2017; 7: 224.
26.
ShtrepiL. Diffusive surface design guidelines. In: 8th congress of the alps adria acoustics association, Zagreb, 21 September 2018.
27.
XiangyangZKeanCJincaiS.On the accuracy of the ray-tracing algorithms based on various sound receiver models. Appl Acoust2003; 64(4): 433–441.
RindelJH. Attenuation of sound reflections due to diffraction. In: Proceedings Nordic acoustical meeting, Aalborg, 20–22 August 1986, pp.257–260. Denmark: Aalborg University.
30.
CoxTJD’AntonioP.Acoustic absorbers and diffusers: theory, design and application. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2017.
31.
CoxTJDalenbackB-ID’AntonioP, et al. A tutorial on scattering and diffusion coefficients for room acoustic surfaces. Acta Acust United Acust2006; 92: 1–15.
32.
RindelJH. Attenuation of sound reflection from curved surfaces. In: Proceedings 25th conference on acoustics, Štrbské Pleso, 1–4 October 1985.
33.
HargreavesTJCoxTJLamYW, et al. Surface diffusion coefficients for room acoustics: free-field measures. J Acoust Soc Am2000; 108(4): 1710–1720.
34.
TsuchiyaYLeeHSakumaT.Scale model measurement of the scattering coefficients of rib/block structure walls. AIJ J Technol Des2013; 19(41): 175–178.
35.
JeonJYLeeSCVorländerM.Development of scattering surfaces for concert halls. Appl Acoust2004; 65(4): 341–355.
36.
ShtrepiLAstolfiAD’AntonioG, et al. Accuracy of the random-incidence scattering coefficient measurement. Appl Acoust2016; 106: 23–35.
37.
LeeHTsuchiyaYSakumaT.Acoustic scattering characteristics of penrose-tiling-type diffusers. Appl Acoust2018; 130: 168–176.
38.
ShtrepiLPratoA.Towards a sustainable approach for sound absorption assessment of building materials: validation of small-scale reverberation room measurements. Appl Acoust2020; 165: 107304.
39.
VorländerM.Computer simulations in room acoustics: concepts and uncertaintie. J Acoust Soc Am2013; 133: 1203–1213.
