This study concerns an overall evaluation of building envelopes, for what concerns the energy, acoustic and lighting performances. It combines different topics of energy and indoor comfort, with the aim to improve the livability of an existing building (a social housing) by means of a comprehensive retrofit of their envelopes. The novel contribution of this study is to apply some methods for energy retrofit of a building envelope in such a way that objectives are achieved within the state-of-the-art combination simulation, optimization approaches, and equations describing the calculations of sound insulation in buildings. The results showed that properties of building envelope like the value of transmittance of the glass window and thermal properties of materials have an impact on indoor environmental quality and energy performance.
RuparathnaRHewageKSadiqR. Improving the energy efficiency of the existing building stock: a critical review of commercial and institutional buildings. Renew Sust Energ Rev2016; 53: 1032–1045.
2.
HwangRLShuSY. Building envelope regulations on thermal comfort in glass facade buildings and energy-saving potential for PMV-based comfort control. Build Environ2011; 46: 824–834.
3.
OralGKYenerAKBayazitNT. Building envelope design with the objective to ensure thermal, visual and acoustic comfort conditions. Build Environ2004; 39: 281–287.
4.
BerBPremrovMStrukeljA, et al. Experimental investigations of timber–glass composite wall panels. Constr Build Mater2014; 66: 235–246.
5.
SpegeljTLeskovarVZPremrovM. Application of the timber-glass upgrade module for energy refurbishment of the existing energy-inefficient multi-family buildings. Energ Buildings2016; 116: 362–375.
6.
BeesleyPHirosueSRuxtonJ. Responsive architectures: subtle technologies 06. Cambridge, ON, Canada: Riverside Architectural Press, 2006, p. 3.
7.
ThunGVelikovK. Responsive building envelopes: characteristics and evolving paradigms. In: TrubianoF (ed.) Design and construction of high performance homes. London: Routledge, 2012, pp. 75–92.
8.
AddingtonMSchodekD. Smart materials and technologies for the architecture and design professions. Oxford: Elsevier Architectural Press, 2005, pp. 8–15.
9.
SaffariMde GraciaAFernándezC, et al. Simulation-based optimization of PCM melting temperature to improve the energy performance in buildings. Appl Energ2017; 202: 420–434.
10.
ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2017. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy.
11.
AndargieMSTouchieMObrienW. A review of factors affecting occupant comfort in multi-unit residential buildings. Build Environ2019; 160: 106182.
12.
DuboisMCBlomsterbergÅ. Energy saving potential and strategies for electric lighting in future North European, low energy office buildings: a literature review. Energ Buildings2011; 43: 2572–2582.
13.
RoisinBBodartMDeneyerA, et al. Lighting energy savings in offices using different control systems and their real consumption. Energ Buildings2008; 40: 514–523.
14.
Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). Recommended practice for daylighting. New York: IESNA, 2013.
15.
ShishegarNBoubekriM. Quantifying electrical energy savings in offices through installing daylight responsive control systems in hot climates. Energ Buildings2017; 153: 87–98.
16.
BS 8206-2:2008. Lighting for buildings. Part 2—code of practice for daylighting.
17.
RasmussenBHolger RindelJ. Sound insulation between dwellings—descriptors applied in building regulations in Europe. Appl Acoust2010; 71: 171–180.
18.
European Environment Agency (EEA). Noise in Europe 2014. EEA Report No. 10/2014, 2014. Copenhagen:EEA.
EN ISO 12354-3:2017. Building acoustics—estimation of acoustic performance of buildings from the performance of elements. Part 3: airborne sound insulation against outdoor sound.
21.
NaticchiaBCarbonariA. Feasibility analysis of an active technology to improve acoustic comfort in buildings. Build Environ2007; 42: 2785–2796.
McMullanR. Environmental science in building (Building and surveying series). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.
24.
WarnockACC. Chapter 105: Sound insulation—airborne and impact. In: CrockerMJ (ed.) Handbook of noise and vibration control. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2007, pp. 1257–1266.
25.
NeubauerROKangJ. Time structure of the signal in airborne sound insulation. In: European Acoustics Association, Forum Acusticum 2011, Aalborg: S. Hirzel Verlag, 27June–1July2011, pp. 1783–1787.
26.
EN ISO 12354-1:2017. Building acoustics—estimation of acoustic performance of buildings from the performance of elements. Part 1: airborne sound insulation between rooms.
27.
ISO 16283-1:2014. Acoustics—field measurement of sound insulation in buildings and of building elements. Part 1: airborne sound insulation.
28.
PatrícioJBragançaL. The contribution of roller shutters to noise insulation of façades. Build Acoust2004; 11: 309–324.
29.
LordPTempletonD. Detailing for acoustics. New York: Spon Press, 2001.
30.
BarronRF. Industrial noise control and acoustics. Ruston, LA: Louisiana Tech University, 2003.
31.
DemirkaleSY. Çevre ve Yapı Akustiği. Istanbul: Birsen Publishing, 2007 (in Turkish).
BronsemaNR. Moisture movement and mould management in straw bale walls for a cold climate. Master‘s Thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada, 2010.
