In this study, an experimental method is proposed to measure the real area of contact between an alumina sphere and an Al surface based on the adhesive transfer of the Au film and the scanning electron microscope in the back-scattered mode. A thin film of Au is sputtered on the alumina sphere before the indentation with the Al surface. After indentation, the interfaces of the alumina sphere and Al surface are observed by the scanning electron microscope. The contact area can be identified based on both the distributions of the alumina and Au on the alumina sphere and Al surface, respectively. The measured contact area at different nominal pressures are compared to predictions made by several popular theoretical elastic-plastic rough surface contact models.
AngadiSVJacksonRLChoeS-Y, et al.A multiphysics finite element model of a 35A automotive connector including multiscale rough surface contact. J Electron Packag2012; 134: 011001–011001.
2.
Zhang P. Effects of surface roughness on electrical contact, RF heating and field enhancement. PhD Dissertation, University of Michigan, USA, 2012.
3.
LiuXLCaiZBLiuSB, et al.Effect of roughness on electrical contact performance of electronic components. Microelectron Reliab2017; 74: 100–109.
4.
ParkYWJungJPLeeKY. Overview of fretting corrosion in electrical connectors. Int J Autom Technol2006; 7: 75–83.
5.
BinderL. Der Widerstand von Kontakten. Elektrotech Maschinenbau1912; 30: 781–782.
6.
WooKLThomasTR. Contact of rough surfaces: a review of experimental work. Wear1980; 58: 331–340.
7.
HolmR. Electric contacts, New York: Springer, 1967.
8.
TaborD. The hardness of materials, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951.
9.
Dwyer-JoyceRSDrinkwaterBWQuinnAM. The use of ultrasound in the investigation of rough surface interfaces. ASME J Tribol2001; 123: 8–16.
10.
Dwyer-JoyceRSDrinkwaterBW. In situ measurement of contact area and pressure distribution in machine elements. Tribol Lett2003; 14: 41–52–52.
11.
Myers M, Leidner M and Schmidt H. Effect of contact parameters on current density distribution in a contact interface. In: 2011 IEEE 57th Holm conference on electrical contacts (Holm), 2011, pp.1–9. New York: IEEE.
12.
WangDUeckermannASchachtA, et al.Tire–road contact stiffness. Tribol Lett2014; 56: 397–402.
13.
D’yachenko PE, Tolkacheva NN, Andreev GA, et al. The actual contact area between touching surfaces, Translated by Consultant Bureau, New York, USA, 1964.
14.
NittaI. Measurements of real contact areas using PET films (thickness, 0.9 µm). Wear1995; 181: 844–849.
15.
BettscheiderSGachotCRosenkranzA. How to measure the real contact area? A simple marker and relocation foot-printing approach. Tribol Int2016; 103: 167–175.
16.
XuYChenYZhangA, et al.A new method for the measurement of real area of contact by the adhesive transfer of thin Au film. Tribol Lett2018; 66: 32–32.
17.
SwinglerJ. The resolution dependence of measured fractal characteristics for a real un-dismantled electrical contact interface. Wear2010; 268: 1178–1183.
18.
KristonAFülöpTIsitmanNA, et al.A novel method for contact analysis of rubber and various surfaces using micro-computerized-tomography. Polym Test2016; 53: 132–142.
19.
ZhangFLiuJDingX, et al.Experimental and finite element analyses of contact behaviors between non-transparent rough surfaces. J Mech Phys Solids2019; 126: 87–100.
20.
JohnsonJEMcIffTELeeP, et al.Validation of radiocarpal joint contact models based on images from a clinical MRI scanner. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng2014; 17: 378–387.
21.
Liu H, Leray D, Colin S, et al. Finite element based surface roughness study for ohmic contact of microswitches. In: 2012 IEEE 58th Holm conference on electrical contacts (Holm), 2012, pp.1–10. New York: IEEE.
22.
Liu H and McBride JW. A finite element based electrical resistance study for rough surfaces: applied to a Bi-layered Au/MWCNT composite for micro-switching applications. In: 2016 IEEE 62nd Holm conference on electrical contacts (Holm), 2016, pp.65–71. New York: IEEE.
23.
SawadaSShimizuKShimadaS, et al.Prediction of electrical contact resistance of tin-plated and silver-plated terminals. SEI Technical Review2010; 71: 37–43.
24.
Yastrebov VA, Cailletaud G, Proudhon H, et al. Three-level multi-scale modeling of electrical contacts sensitivity study and experimental validation. In: 2015 IEEE 61st Holm conference on electrical contacts (Holm), 2015, pp.414–422. New York: IEEE.
25.
LeidnerMSchmidtHMyersM, et al.A new simulation approach to characterizing the mechanical and electrical qualities of a connector contact. Eur Phys J-Appl Phys2010; 49.
26.
Leidner M, Schmidt H and Myers M. Simulation of the current density distribution within electrical contacts. In: 2010 proceedings of the 56th IEEE Holm conference on electrical contacts, 2010, pp.1–9. New York: IEEE.
27.
AlmeidaLRamadossRJacksonR, et al.Laterally actuated multicontact MEMS relay fabricated using MetalMUMPS process: experimental characterization and multiscale contact modeling. J Micro/Nanolith MEMS MOEMS2007; 6: 023009–023009.
28.
Polchow JR, Angadi S, Jackson RL, et al. A multi-physics finite element analysis of round pin high power connectors. In: 2010 proceedings of the 56th IEEE Holm conference on electrical contacts, 2010, pp.1–9. New York: IEEE.
29.
Jackson RL, Down MP, Liu H, et al. A comparison of the predictions of a multiscale model and optical real area of contact measurements. In: 2014 IEEE 60th Holm conference on electrical contacts (Holm), 2014, pp.1–8. New York: IEEE.
30.
KogutLEtsionI. Contact of a compliant curved and a nominally flat rough surfaces. Tribol Trans2000; 43: 507–513.
31.
Jackson RL, Ashurst WR, Flowers GT, et al. The effect of initial connector insertions on electrical contact resistance. In: Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE Holm conference on electrical contacts, 2007, pp.17–24. New York: IEEE.
32.
Jackson RL, Liu H and Leray D. A comparison of the predictions of a finite element model and multiscale model for a rough MEMS electrical contact. In: 2013 IEEE 59th Holm conference on electrical contacts (Holm 2013), 2013, pp.1–9. New York: IEEE.
33.
Shen Q, Qiu J, Liu G, et al. Rough surface simulation and electrical contact transient performance. In: 2016 prognostics and system health management conference (PHM-Chengdu), Chengdu, China, 19–21 October 2016, pp.1–6.
34.
EidHJoshiNMcGruerN, et al.A model of contact with adhesion of a layered elastic-plastic microsphere with a rigid flat surface. J Tribol2011; 133: 031406–031406.
35.
ChenZGoltsbergREtsionI. A universal model for a frictionless elastic-plastic coated spherical normal contact with moderate to large coating thicknesses. Tribol Int2017; 114: 485–493.
36.
JohnsonKL. Contact mechanics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.
37.
AnBWangXXuY, et al.Deterministic elastic-plastic modelling of rough surface contact including spectral interpolation and comparison to theoretical models. Tribol Int2019; 135: 246–258.
38.
ArchardJF. Elastic deformation and the laws of friction. Proc R Soc Lond A1957; 243: 190–205.
39.
JacksonRLStreatorJL. A multiscale model for contact between rough surfaces. Wear2006; 261: 1337–1347.
40.
GreenwoodJAWilliamsonJBP. Contact of nominally flat surfaces. Proc R Soc Lond A1966; 295: 300–319.
41.
JacksonRLGreenI. A statistical model of elasto-plastic asperity contact between rough surfaces. Tribol Int2006; 39: 906–914.
42.
BowdenFPTaborD. Friction and lubrication, London: Methuen, 1967.
43.
JacksonRLGreenI. A finite element study of elasto-plastic hemispherical contact. ASME J Tribol2005; 127: 343–354.
44.
MannersW. Plastic deformation of a sinusoidal surface. Wear2008; 264: 60–68.
45.
JacksonRLGhaedniaHPopeS. A solution of rigid–perfectly plastic deep spherical indentation based on slip-line theory. Tribol Lett2015; 58: 47–47.
46.
GhaedniaHPopeSAJacksonRL, et al.A comprehensive study of the elasto-plastic contact of a sphere and a flat. Tribol Int2016; 93: 78–90.
47.
GhaedniaHWangXSahaS, et al.A review of elastic–plastic contact mechanics. Appl Mech Rev2017; 69: 060804–060804.
48.
JacksonRLKrithivasanVWilsonWE. The pressure to cause complete contact between elastic plastic sinusoidal surfaces. Proc IMechE, Part J: J Engineering Tribology2008; 222: 857–864.
49.
KrithivasanVJacksonRL. An analysis of three-dimensional elasto-plastic sinusoidal contact. Tribol Lett2007; 27: 31–43.
50.
GaoYFBowerAFKimKS, et al.The behavior of an elastic-perfectly plastic sinusoidal surface under contact loading. Wear2006; 261: 145–154.
51.
JacksonRLMarghituDGreenI. Predicting the coefficient of restitution of impacting elastic-perfectly plastic spheres. Nonlin Dyn2010; 60: 217–229.
52.
JacksonRLGhaedniaHElkadyYA, et al.A closed-form multiscale thermal contact resistance model. IEEE Trans Comp Packag Technol2012; 2: 1158–1171.
53.
Jackson RL, Malucci RD, Angadi S, et al. A simplified model of multiscale electrical contact resistance and comparison to existing closed form models. In: The 55th IEEE Holm conference on electrical contacts, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2009.
54.
Zhang X and Jackson RL. The influence of multiscale roughness on the real contact area and contact resistance between real reference surfaces. In: Proceedings of the 27th international conference on electrical contacts, Dresden, Germany, 22–26 June 2014, pp.1–6.
55.
Wilson WE, Angadi SV and Jackson RL. Electrical contact resistance considering multi-scale roughness. In: 2008 IEEE Holm conference on electrical contacts, Orlando, FL, USA, 2008.
KogutLEtsionI. Elastic-plastic contact analysis of a sphere and a rigid flat. ASME J Appl Mech2002; 69: 657–662.
58.
Chu NR and Jackson RL. The effect of asperity geometry on elastic-plastic statistical and multi-scale rough surface contact models. In: The STLE tribology frontiers, Chicago, IL, USA, 2018.
