Building on organization study’s nascent interest in the organizational potential of liminal urban spaces beyond the confines of traditional firms, this article chronicles how Google draws on participatory urban practices to appropriate and simulate urban commons as an extension of the tech campus. Weaving together ethnographic fieldwork from San Francisco and Silicon Valley, I show how the city serves as a laboratory for prototyping new organizational paradigms that blend workplace gamification with urban activation strategies, by focusing on the spaces “in-between.” That is, areas of everyday urban life that are not (yet) fully enclosed as formal production sites, while providing important avenues for market expansion and commodification in a digital age. By staging a holistic ecology of work and life under the corporate canopy, Google’s urban-style platforms aim to extract sociability as an economic fuel, while curtailing the unruly potential of the street as the dwelling place of the collective.
AltenriedMoritzNieblerValentin (2024) ‘Latent Conflict, Invisible Organisation: Everyday Struggles in Platform Labour’, in MezzadraSandroCuppiniNiccolóFrapportiMattiaPironeMaurilio (eds) Capitalism in the Platform Age: Emerging Assemblages of Labour and Welfare in Urban Spaces, pp. 353–71. Cham: Springer.
BarnsSarah (2019) ‘Negotiating the Platform Pivot: From Participatory Digital Ecosystems to Infrastructures of Everyday Life’, Geography Compass13(9): e12464.
7.
BenjaminWalter (2002) The Arcades Project (trans. HowardEilandKevinMcLaughlin). Cambridge, MA; London: Belknap Press: An Imprint of Harvard University Press.
BeyesTimon (2010) ‘Uncontained: The Art and Politics of Reconfiguring Urban Space’, Culture and Organization16(3): 229–46.
10.
BeyesTimon (2012) ‘Organizing the Entrepreneurial City’, in HjorthDaniel (ed.) Handbook on Organisational Entrepreneurship, pp. 320–37. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
11.
BeyesTimonSteyaertChris (2012) ‘Spacing Organization: Non-Representational Theory and Performing Organizational Space’, Organization19(1): 45–61.
12.
ChenCarolyn (2022) Work Pray Code: When Work Becomes Religion in Silicon Valley. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13.
ChiapelloEveBoltanskiLuc (2005) The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso Books.
DeckerStephanie (2014) ‘Solid Intentions: An Archival Ethnography of Corporate Architecture and Organizational Remembering’, Organization21(4): 514–42.
FraserNancy (2017) ‘Crisis of Care? On the Social-Reproductive Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism’, in BhattacharyaTithi (ed.) Social Reproduction Theory: Remapping Class, Recentering Oppression, pp. 21–36. London: Pluto Press.
HalpernOrit (2014) Beautiful Data: a History of Vision and Reason since 1945. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
35.
HalpernOritLeCavalierJesseCalvilloNereaPietschWolfgang (2013) ‘Test-Bed Urbanism’, Public Culture25(2): 272–306.
36.
HarrisMalcolm (2023) Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World. New York, NY: Little, Brown and Company.
37.
HarveyDavid (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford; Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
38.
HayesDennis (1999) Behind the Silicon Curtain: The Seductions of Work in a Lonely Era. Boston, MA: South End Press.
39.
HerringChris (2019) ‘Complaint-Oriented Policing: Regulating Homelessness in Public Space’, American Sociological Review84(5): 769–800.
40.
HowardRobert (1985) Brave New Workplace. New York, NY: Viking Adult.
41.
HuwsUrsula (2019) ‘The Hassle of Housework: Digitalisation and the Commodification of Domestic Labour’, Feminist Review123(1): 8–23.
42.
JarrettKylie (2019) ‘Through the Reproductive Lens: Labour and Struggle at the intersection of Culture and Economy’, in ChandlerDavidFuchsChristian (eds) Digital Objects, Digital Subjects, pp. 103–116. London: University of Westminster Press.
43.
KerrRonRobinsonSarah (2016) ‘Architecture, Symbolic Capital and Elite Mobilisations: The Case of the Royal Bank of Scotland Corporate Campus’, Organization23(5): 699–721.
44.
KerrRonRobinsonSarah K.ElliottCarole (2016) ‘Modernism, Postmodernism, and Corporate Power: Historicizing the Architectural Typology of the Corporate Campus’, Management & Organizational History11(2): 123–46.
45.
KnausKatharinaMargiesNinaSchillingHannah (2021) ‘Thinking the City through Work’, City25(3–4): 303–314.
46.
KnoxHannah (2010) ‘Cities and Organisation: The Information City and Urban Form’, Culture and Organization16(3): 185–95.
LazzaratoMaurizio (1996) ‘Immaterial Labor’, in VirnoPaoloHardtMichael (eds) Radical Thought in Italy : A Potential Politics, pp. 133–47. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
LeeAndrew (2024) Defying Displacement: Urban Recomposition and Social War. Chico, CA: AK Press.
52.
LefebvreHenri (2014) Critique of Everyday Life: The Three-Volume Text. London: Verso Books.
53.
MaharawalManissa M. (2023) ‘Infrastructural Activism: Google Bus Blockades, Affective Politics, and Environmental Gentrification in San Francisco’, Antipode55(5): 1454–78.
54.
McNeillDonald (2016) ‘Governing a City of Unicorns: Technology Capital and the Urban Politics of San Francisco’, Urban Geography37(4): 494–513.
55.
MartinReinhold (2003) The Organizational Complex: Architecture, Media, and Corporate Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
56.
MatternShannon (2021) A City Is Not a Computer: Other Urban Intelligences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
SadowskiJathan (2020) Too Smart: How Digital Capitalism is Extracting Data, Controlling Our Lives, and Taking over the World. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
65.
SadowskiJathan (2021) ‘Who Owns the Future City? Phases of Technological Urbanism and Shifts in Sovereignty’, Urban Studies58(8): 1732–44.
SchwallerKatja (2018) ‘San Francisco: Willkommen in der Hyper-Gentrifizierung!’, Nr. 38. Die Wochenzeitung WOZ, 20September, Retrieved June 24, 2025, from https://www.woz.ch/!97HFDYN3Z8X1
68.
SchwallerKatja (ed.) (2019a) Technopolis: Urbane Kämpfe in der San Francisco Bay Area. Berlin; Zurich: Assoziation A / Seismo.
69.
SchwallerKatja (2019b) ‘Willkommen in Twitterlandia: Gamifizierung, digitale Arbeit und ein urbaner “Dotcom-Korridor”’, in SchwallerKatja (ed.) Technopolis: Urbane Kämpfe in der San Francisco Bay Area, pp. 110–129. Berlin, Hamburg: Assoziation A.
70.
SchwallerKatja (2021) ‘Becoming Twitterlandia’, in Anti-Eviction Mapping Project (ed.) Counterpoints: A San Francisco Bay Area Atlas of Displacement & Resistance, pp. 365–68. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
71.
SchwallerKatja (2023) ‘Verhärtungen unter der Oberfläche – Mike Davis im Plattform-Urbanismus: Kommentar zu Mike Davis’ „Festung L.A.“ (2006 [1990])’, sub\urban. zeitschrift für kritische stadtforschung11(3/4): 411–28.
Sidewalk Labs (n.d.) ‘Sidewalk Labs - Urban Innovation’, Sidewalk Labs, Retrieved September 19, 2023, from https://www.sidewalklabs.com/
77.
SmithNeil (1996) The New Urban Frontier: Gentrification and the Revanchist City. London; New York: Routledge.
78.
SpencerDouglas (2016) The Architecture of Neoliberalism: How Contemporary Architecture Became an Instrument of Control and Compliance. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic.
StehlinJohn (2016) ‘The Post-Industrial “Shop Floor”: Emerging Forms of Gentrification in San Francisco’s Innovation Economy’, Antipode48(2): 474–93.
81.
TerranovaTiziana (2019) ‘Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digital Economy’, Social Text2(63): 33–58.
82.
TurnerFred (2008) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
83.
TurnerFred (2009) ‘Burning Man at Google: A Cultural Infrastructure for New Media Production’, New Media & Society11(1–2): 73–94.
84.
TurnerFred (2016) ‘Prototype’, in PetersBenjamin (ed.) Digital Keywords: A Vocabulary of Information Society and Culture, pp. 257–268. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
85.
TurnerFred (2018) ‘The Arts at Facebook: An Aesthetic Infrastructure for Surveillance Capitalism’, Poetics67: 53–62.
von OstenMarion (2011) ‘Irene ist Viele! Or What We Call “Productive” Forces’, in ArandaJulietaWoodBrian KuanVidokleAnton (eds) Are You Working Too Much? Post-Fordism, Precarity, and the Labor of Art, pp. 40–57. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
88.
WalkerRichard A. (2018) Pictures of a Gone City: Tech and the Dark Side of Prosperity in the San Francisco Bay Area. Oakland, CA: PM Press.
