The case for using academic journals lists is critically scrutinised. An effect of their use, it argued, is to stifle diversity and constrict scholarly innovation. A monoculture is fostered in which a preoccupation with shoehorning research into a form prized by elite, US-oriented journals overrides a concern to maintain and enrich the diversity of topics, the range of methods and the plurality of perspectives engaged in business and management research. Use of a particular journal list, such as the one prepared by the Association of Business Schools (ABS), can come to dominate the scholarly terrain of a particular discipline with consequences that can be damaging to funding as well as to research culture.
Adler, N.J. and Harzing, A-W. (2009) ‘When Knowledge Wins: Transcending the Sense of and Nonsense of Academic Rankings’, Academy of Management Learning and Education8(1): 72-95.
2.
Aram, J.D. and Salipante, P.F. ( 2003) ‘Bridging Scholarship in Management:
3.
Epistemological Reflections’, British Journal of Management14 : 189-205.
4.
British Journal of Management (2001) Special Issue, S1-S80.
5.
Burgess, T.F. and Shaw, N.E. ( 2010) ‘Editorial Board Membership of Management and Business Journals: A Social Network Analysis Study of the Financial Times 40‘ , British Journal of Management21(3): 627-48.
6.
Downing, L. and Nobus, D. ( 2004) ‘The Iconography of Asphyxiophilia: From Fantasmatic Fetish to Forensic Fact’, Paragraph: A Journal of Modern Critical Theory November: 1-15.
7.
Dunne, S., Harney, S. and Parker, M. ( 2008) ‘The Responsibilities of Management Intellectuals: A Survey’, Organization15(2): 157-59.
8.
Espeland, W.N. and Sauder, M. ( 2007) Rankings and Reactivity : How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds’, American Journal of Sociology113(1): 1-40.
9.
Garfield, E. ( 1995) ‘Citation Indexes to Science: A New Dimension in Documentation Through Association of Ideas’, Science122: 108-11.
10.
Geery, J., Marriott, L. and Rowlinson, M. ( 2004) ‘Journal Rankings in Business and Management and the 2001 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK’, British Journal of Management15: 95-141.
11.
Giacalone, R.A. ( 2009) ‘Academic Rankings in Research Institutions: A Case of Skewed Mind-Sets and Professional Amnesia’, Academy of Management Learning and Education8(1): 122-26.
12.
Grey, C. (2010) ‘Organizing Studies : Publications, Politics and Polemic’ , Organization Studies31(6): 677-94.
13.
Grey, G.C. and Kendzia, V.B. ( 2009) ‘Organizational Self-Censorship: Corporate Sponsorship, Non-profit Funding, and the Educational Experience’, Canadian Review of Sociology46(2): 161-77.
14.
Gulati, R. ( 2007) ‘Tent Poles, Tribalism, and Boundary Spanning: The Rigor-Relevance Debte in Management Research’, Academy of Management Journal50(4): 775-82.
15.
Hall, C.M. ( 2011) ‘Publish or Perish: Bibliometric Analysis, Journal Ranking and the Assessment of Research Quality in Tourism’, Tourism Management32: 16-27.
16.
Hambrick, D.C. ( 1994) ‘What if the Academy Actually Mattered?’ , Academy of Management Review19: 11-16.
17.
Harvey, C. , Kelly, A. , Morris, H. and Rowlinson, M., eds (2010) Academic Journal Quality Guide Version 4, Association of Business Schools . Available at http://www.the-abs.org.uk/files//absalphawintro.pdf (accessed 20 October 2010).
18.
Harvey, C., Morris, H. and Kelly, A., eds (2008) Academic Journal Quality Guide Version 2. Introduction: Context, Purpose and Methodology . Association of Business Schools. Available at http://www.the-abs.org.uk/files/ABS%20Journal%20Ranking%20Guide%20Introduction.pdf (accessed 20 October 2010).
19.
Hinings, C.R. ( 2010) ‘Thirty Years of Organization Studies: Enduring Themes in a Changing Institutional Field’, Organization Studies31(6): 659-76.
20.
Hinings, C.R. & Greenwood, R. ( 2002) ‘Disconnects and Consequences in Organization Theory’ , Administrative Science Quarterly47(3): 411-21.
21.
Hogler, R. and Gross, M.A. (2009) ‘Journal Rankings and Academic Research: Two Discourses about the Quality of Faculty Work’, Management Communication Quarterly23(1): 107-26.
22.
Kelly, A., Morris, H. and Harvey, C. ( 2009) ‘Modelling the Outcome of the UK Business and Management Studies RAE 2008 with Reference to the ABS Journal Quality Guide’, Association of Business Schools. Available from http://www.the-abs.org.uk/files//RAE2008_ABS2009_final.pdf (accessed 21 October 2010).
23.
Lowry, P.B., Humphreys, S., Malwitz, J. and Nix, J. ( 2007) ‘A Scientometric Study of the Perceived Quality of Business and Technical Communication Journals’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication50(4): 352-78.
24.
Macdonald, S. and Kam, J. ( 2007) ‘Ring a Ring o’ Roses: Quality Journals and Gamesmanship in Management Studies’, Journal of Management Studies44(4): 640-55.
25.
Meriläinen, S., Tienari, J., Thomas, R. and Davies, A. ( 2008) ‘Hegemonic Academic Practices: Experiences of Publishing from the Periphery’, Organization15(4): 584-97.
26.
Mingers, J., Watson, K. and Scaparra, P. ( 2009) ‘Estimating Business and Management Journal Quality from the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UK’, Kent Business Working Paper No. 205. Available at: http://www.kent.ac.uk/kbs/documents/research/working-papers/2009/205-rae-papers.pdf (accessed 21 October 2010).
27.
Mingers, J. and Willmott, H. ( 2010) ‘Moulding (Making) the One-Dimensional Academic: The Performative Effects of Journal Rankings Lists’ Working Paper, University of Kent.
28.
Morris, H., Harvey, C. and Kelly, A. ( 2009) Modelling the Outcome of the UK Business and Management Studies RAE 2008 with Referenceto the ABS Journal Quality Guide, Association of Business Schools. Available from: http://www.the-abs.org.uk/files/RAE2008_ABS2009_final.pdf
29.
Morris, H., Harvey, C., and Kelly, A.(2010) ‘Journal Rankings and the ABS Journal Quality Guide’ , Management Decision47(9): 1441-51.
30.
Nkomo, S.M. ( 2009) "The Seductive Power of Academic Journal Ratings: Challenges of Searching for the Otherwise’, Academy of Management Learning and Education8(1): 106-12.
31.
Özbilgin, M.F. ( 2009) ‘From Journal Rankings to Making Sense of the World’ , Academy of Management Learning and Education8(1): 113-21.
32.
Parker, M. ( 2001) ‘Fucking Management: Queer Theory and Reflexivity’ , Ephemera1(1): 36-53.
33.
RAE (2009) RAE 2008 Subject Overview Reports: I36 Business and Management Studies. Available at http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/ov (accessed 20 October 2010 ).
34.
Rentz, K. ( 2009) ‘The Importance of "Niche"’ Journals To New Business-Communication Academics-and To All of Us’, Journal of Business Communication46(3): 404-11.
35.
Rowlinson, M., Hassard, J. and Mohun, S. (in press) ‘Research Audits and their Financial Consequences’ , in C. Cassell and B. Lee (eds) Challenges and Controversies in Management Research . London: Routledge.
36.
Rynes, S.L. ( 2007) ‘ Afterword: To the Next 50 Years’ , Academy of Management Journal50(6): 1379-83.
37.
Seglen, P.O. ( 1992) ‘The Skewness of Science’, Journal of the American Society for Information Science43(9): 628-38.
38.
Seglen, P.O. ( 1997) ‘Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research’, British Medical Journal314: 497-506.
39.
Sikka, P., Willmott, H.C. and Mitchell, A. ( 1998) ‘Sweeping it Under the Carpet : The Role of Accountancy Firms in Moneylaundering’, Accounting, Organizations and Society23(5/6): 589-607.
40.
Starbuck, W.H. ( 2005) ‘How Much Better are the most Prestigious Journals? The Statistics of Academic Publication’, Organization Science16(2): 180-200.
Tranfield, D. and Starkey, K. ( 1998) ‘The Nature, Social Organization and Promotion of Management Research: Towards Policy’, British Journal of Management9(4): 341-53.
43.
Uva, J.L. ( 1995) ‘Review: Autoerotic asphyxiation in the United States’ , Journal of Forensic Sciences40(4): 574-81.
44.
Wells, P. ( 2010) ‘The ABS Rankings of Journal Quality: An Exercise in Delusion’, Working Paper, The Centre for Business Relationships, Accountability, Sustainability and Society, Cardiff Business School. Available at: http://www.brass.cf.ac.uk/uploads/010610_ABS_Rankings.pdf (accessed 21 October 2010).
45.
Wensley, R. ( 2009) ‘Research in UK Business Schools or Management Research in the UK?’, Journal of Management Development28(8): 718-27.
46.
Zizek, S. ( 1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology. London : Verso.
