In this editorial, we identify some of the opportunities and the consequences of generative artificial intelligence for academia. We discuss how generative artificial intelligence will affect the three main areas of an academic’s job responsibilities: research, teaching and service. To animate our ideas, we offer illustrative examples of how generative artificial intelligence will impact each of these areas. Further recognizing that generative artificial intelligence poses both opportunities and consequences for academia from a management learning perspective, we use examples that represent a positive and a negative outcome resultant of generative artificial intelligence to each of the three areas of academic responsibility.
BarrosAAlcadipaniR (2023) Decolonizing journals in management and organizations? Epistemological colonial encounters and the double translation. Management Learning54(4): 576–586.
3.
BerthoffA (1987) Foreword. In: FreirePMacedoD (eds) Literacy: Reading the Word and the World. London: Routledge, XII–XIX.
4.
BudhwarPChowdhurySWoodG, et al (2023) Human resource management in the age of generative artificial intelligence: Perspectives and research directions on ChatGPT. Human Resource Management Journal33: 606–659.
5.
ButlerNDelaneyHŚliwaM (2017) The labour of academia ephemera. Theory and politics in organization17(3): 467–480.
EllulJ (1964) The Technological Society. New York: Vintage Books.
8.
FreireP (2005) Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. New York: Continuum.
9.
JamilNHumphries-KilMDeyK (2023) Infusing courageous love for universal dignity and environmental response-ability through management education and learning: Inspired by Freire’s dream. Management Learning. Epub ahead of print 14 August. DOI: 10.1177/13505076231192172.
10.
JeanesELoackerBŚliwaM (2019) Complexities, challenges and implications of collaborative work within a regime of performance measurement: The case of management and organisation studies. Studies in Higher Education44(9): 1539–1553.
KranzbergM (1986) Kranzberg’s laws. Technology and Culture27(3): 544–560.
13.
MollickERMollickL (2023a) Assigning AI: Seven approaches for students, with prompts. SSRN. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=
14.
MollickERMollickL (2023b) Using AI to implement effective teaching strategies in classrooms: Five strategies, including prompts. SSRN. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=
15.
National Academy of Sciences (2009) On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research. 3rd edn.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
16.
PrasadA (2015) Liminal transgressions, or where should the critical academy go from here? Reimagining the future of doctoral education to engender research sustainability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting26: 108–116.
17.
PrasadAŚliwaM (2022) Towards an aspirational future: Cultivating ontological empathy within the ethos of Management Learning. Management Learning53(2): 139–145.
18.
RaischSKrakowskiS (2021) Artificial intelligence and management: The automation–augmentation paradox. Academy of Management Review46(1): 192–210.
19.
ShoukryHFatienP (2023) That’s political! A Freirean perspective towards coaching as a social practice. Management Learning. Epub ahead of print 21 August. DOI: 10.1177/13505076231189776.
20.
ŚliwaMKellardN (2022) The Research Impact Agenda: Navigating the Impact of Impact. London: Routledge.
21.
WinnerL (1977) Autonomous Technology: Technics Out-of-control as a Theme in Political History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22.
ZulfiqarGPrasadA (2021) Challenging social inequality in the Global South: Class, privilege, and consciousness-raising through critical management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education20(2): 156–181.
