In what ways are organizational learning a relevant theoretical construct? The article taps into a debate on what is relevance to practitioners versus researchers’ responsibility. The publications on organizational learning are on the rise, but the patterns have changed and points to a bifurcation within the field of organizational learning. On one hand, organizational learning is a means to further organizational performance, a fixed goal to be measured, which sometimes demands unlearning. On the other hand, there is a call for organizational learning to be encompassing contemporary societal challenges like widespread digitalization, sustainable production, and an inclusive labor market. This may appear as a cleavage between immediate relevance to practitioners and researchers’ responsibilities for the development of relevant and critical knowledge. I propose to embrace a pragmatist theory of learning that can help address the unknown and include creative imagination directed toward developing an organizational learning field, which is also ready for the future.
AbbottA (2009) Organizations and the Chicago School. In: AdlerPS (ed.) Sociology and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 399–420.
2.
AdlerPSdu GayPMorganG, et al. (2014) The Oxford Handbook of Sociology, Social Theory, and Organization Studies: Contemporary Currents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3.
AndersonLThorpeRColemanC (2020) Reviewing Management Learning: The field and the journal. Management Learning51(1): 17–34.
ArgyrisC (2000) Flawed Advice and the Management Trap. How Managers Can Know When They’re Getting Good Advice and When They’re Not. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
ArgyrisC (2003) Actionable knowledge. In: KnudsenCTsoukasH (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Organization Theory. Meta-theoretical Perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press, 423–452.
7.
ArgyrisCSchönDA (1978) Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
8.
ArgyrisCSchönDA (1996) Organizational Learning II. Theory, Method, and Practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
9.
ArjaliésD-LLorinoPSimpsonB (2013) Understanding organizational creativity: Insights from pragmatism. In: KelemenMRumensN (eds) American Pragmatism and Organization. Issues and Controversies. Dorchester: Gower, 131–145.
10.
BabujiHCrossanMM (2004) From questions to answers: Reviewing organizational learning research. Management Learning35(4): 397–417.
11.
BaškaradaSChandranAShokrM, et al. (2016) Facilitating organizational learning through agent-based modeling and simulation experimentation. The Learning Organization23(6): 429–443.
12.
BrandiUElkjaerB (2013) Organisational learning: Knowing in organising. In: KelemenMRumensN (eds) American Pragmatism and Organization. Issues and Controversies. Dorchester: Gower, 147–161.
13.
BrownJSDuguidP (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science2(1): 40–57.
14.
CaldwellR (2012) Systems thinking, organizational change and agency: A practice theory critique of Senge’s learning organization. Journal of Change Management12(2): 145–164.
CastanedaDIManriqueLFCuellarS (2018) Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management22(2): 299–325.
17.
CheungCKGengSChuahKB, et al. (2016) Organizational learning in shop floor level. The Learning Organization23(5): 274–298.
18.
ChiaR (2017) A process-philosophical understanding of organizational learning as “wayfinding” Process, practices and sensitivity to environmental affordances. The Learning Organization24(2): 107–118.
19.
ChivaRAlegreJLapiedraR (2007) Measuring organisational learning capability among the workforce. International Journal of Manpower28(3/4): 224–242.
20.
CleggSRDanyFGreyC (2011) Introduction to the special issue critical management studies and managerial education: New contexts? New agenda?M@n@gement14(5): 272–279.
21.
CleggSRKornbergerMCarterC, et al. (2006) For management?Management Learning37(1): 7–27.
22.
CookSDNYanowD (1993) Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry2(4): 373–390.
23.
CzarniawskaB (2008) A Theory of Organizing. Cheltenham; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
24.
DavisGF (2017) Organization theory and the dilemmas of a post-corporate economy. In: DavisGF (ed.) How Institutions Matter! Research in the Sociology of Organizations. London: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 311–322.
25.
DeweyJ (1933 [1986]) How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In: BoydstonJA (ed.) The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale, IL; Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 105–352.
26.
DeweyJ (1938 [1986]) Logic. The theory of inquiry. In: BoydstonJA (ed.) The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale, IL; Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1–539.
27.
DeweyJ (1938 [1988]) Experience and education. In: BoydstonJA (ed.) The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale, IL; Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 1–62.
28.
DeweyJ (1939 [1988]) Experience, knowledge and value: A reejoinder. In: BoydstonJA (ed.) The Later Works of John Dewey, 1925–1953. Carbondale, IL; Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, 3–90.
29.
DierkesMAntalABChildJ, et al. (2001) Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30.
DinnersteinD (1976) The Mermaid and the Minotaur: Sexual Arrangements and Human Malaise. New York: Harper & Row.
31.
Easterby-SmithM (1997) Disciplines of organizational learning: Contributions and critiques. Human Relations50(9): 1085–1113.
32.
Easterby-SmithMAraujoL (1999) Organizational learning: Current debates and opportunities. In: Easterby-SmithMAraujoLBurgoyneJ (eds) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. London: SAGE, 1–21.
33.
Easterby-SmithMLylesMA (2003) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
34.
Easterby-SmithMLylesMA (2011) Handbook of Organizational Learning & Knowledge Management. 2nd edn. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
35.
Easterby-SmithMAraujoLBurgoyneJ (1999) Learning around Organizations: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: SAGE.
36.
Easterby-SmithMCrossanMMNicoliniD (2000) Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies37(6): 783–796.
37.
ElkjærB (1988) Hvor der er liv, er der håb. Om et møde med Dorothy Dinnerstein (Where life exists, there is hope. About a meeting with Dorothy Dinnerstein). Kvindeforskning1(2): 16–24.
38.
ElkjaerB (1999) In search of a social learning theory. In: Easterby-SmithMAraujoLBurgoyneJ (eds) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: Developments in Theory and Practice. London: Sage, 75–91.
39.
ElkjaerB (2018) Pragmatism: Learning as creative imagination. In: IllerisK (ed.) Contemporary Theories of Learning. Learning Theorists … in Their Own Words. 2nd edn. Oxon; New York: Routledge, 66–82.
40.
ElkjaerBNickelsenNCM (2015) Researching critical reflection in management education. In: FookJCollingtonVRossF, et al (eds) Researching Critical Reflection: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. London; New York: Routledge, 145–157.
41.
ElkjaerBNickelsenNCM (2016) Intervention as workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning28(5): 266–279.
42.
FenwickT (2008) Understanding relations of individual-collective learning in work: A review of research. Management Learning39(3): 227–243.
43.
FenwickT (2010) Re-thinking the “thing”: Sociomaterial approaches to understanding and researching learning in work. Journal of Workplace Learning22(1): 104–116.
44.
FiolCMO’ConnorEJ (2017a) Unlearning established organizational routines—Part I. The Learning Organization24(1): 13–29.
45.
FiolCMO’ConnorEJ (2017b) Unlearning established organizational routines—Part II. The Learning Organization24(2): 82–92.
46.
FloodRLRommNRA (2018) A systemic approach to processes of power in learning organizations: Part I—Literature, theory, and methodology of triple loop learning. The Learning Organization25(4): 260–272.
47.
FoxS (2009) “This interpreted world”: Two turns to the social in management learning. Management Learning40(4): 371–378.
48.
GherardiS (2009) Knowing and learning in practice-based studies: An introduction. The Learning Organization16(5): 352–359.
49.
GherardiS (2015) How turn to practice may contribute to working life studies. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies5(3a): 13–25.
50.
GherardiSCozzaMPoggioB (2018) Organizational members as storywriters: On organizing practices of reflexivity. The Learning Organization25(1): 51–62.
51.
GherardiSNicoliniDOdellaF (1998) Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations. the notion of situated curriculum. Management Learning29(3): 273–297.
52.
GiorgiA (2002) The question of validity in qualitative research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology33(1): 1–18.
53.
GreyC (2005 [2017]) A Very Short, Fairly Interesting and Reasonably Cheap Book about Studying Organizations. London: SAGE.
54.
HaslePSørensenOH (2013) Employees as individually and collectively acting subjects—Key contributions from Nordic working life research. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies3(3): 9–29.
55.
JainAKMorenoA (2015) Organizational learning, knowledge management practices and firm’s performance: An empirical study of a heavy engineering firm in India. The Learning Organization22(1): 14–39.
56.
JamesW (1898) Philosophical conceptions and practical results. In: BurkhardtFH (ed.) Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57.
JørgensenKM (2018) Spaces of performance: A storytelling approach to learning in higher education. The Learning Organization25(6): 410–421.
58.
KelemenMRumensNVoLC (2019) Questioning and organization studies. Organization Studies40(10): 1529–1542.
59.
KvaleS (1996) Interviews. An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
LevittBMarchJG (1988) Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology14: 319–340.
62.
McKenzieJVarneyS (2018) Energizing middle managers’ practice in organizational learning. The Learning Organization26(6): 383–398.
63.
McQueenRJJansonA (2016) Accelerating tacit knowledge building of client-facing consultants. The Learning Organization23(4): 202–217.
64.
MarchJG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science2(1): 71–87.
65.
MarchJGOlsenJP (1979 [1994]) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. 2nd edn. Oslo; Copenhagen; Stockholm; Boston, MA: Scandinavian University Press.
66.
MarsickVJ (2013) The dimensions of a learning organization questionnaire (DLOQ) introduction to the special issue examining DLOQ use over a decade. Advances in Developing Human Resources15(2): 127–132.
67.
MarsickVJWatkinsKE (1997) Lessons from informal and incidental learning. In: BurgoyneJReynoldsM (eds) Management Learning. London: SAGE, 295–311.
68.
MarsickVJWatkinsKE (2003) Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: The dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources5(2): 132–151.
69.
MongeonPPaul-HusA (2016) The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics106(1): 213–228.
70.
NguyenN (2017) The journey of organizational unlearning: A conversation with William H. Starbuck. The Learning Organization24(1): 58–66.
71.
NicoliniD (2012) Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. an Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
72.
ÖrtenbladA (2017) Editorial. Taking “The Learning Organization” into the future: Introduction of and by the new editor. The Learning Organization24(1): 2–12.
73.
ParkerM (2002) Against Management: Organization in the Age of Managerialism. Cambridge: Polity.
74.
PedlerMBurgoyneJG (2017) Is the learning organisation still alive?The Learning Organization24(2): 119–126.
75.
Popova-NowakIVCsehM (2015) The meaning of organizational learning: A meta-paradigm perspective. Human Resource Development Review14(3): 299–331.
76.
PutnamH (2009) The three enlightenments. In: LeidlmairK (ed.) After Cognitivism. A Reassessment of Cognitive Science and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Springer, 23–35.
77.
QvortrupAWibergM (2017) Dealing with Conceptualizations of Learning between Means and Aims in Theory and Practice. Rotterdam; Boston, MA; Taipei: Sense Publishers.
78.
RajRSrivastavaKB (2016) Mediating role of organizational learning on the relationship between market orientation and innovativeness. The Learning Organization23(5): 370–384.
79.
RashmanLWithersEHartleyJ (2009) Organizational learning and knowledge in public service organizations: A systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews11(4): 463–494.
ReynoldsM (2009) Wild frontiers—Reflections on experiential learning. Management Learning40(4): 387–392.
82.
ScarbroughHRobertsonMSwanJ, et al. (2007) Introduction: Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capabilities Conference Issue. London: SAGE.
83.
SchatzkiTR (2006) On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies27(12): 1863–1873.
84.
SchatzkiTR (2017) Practices and learning. In: GrootenboerPEdwards-GrovesCChoyS (eds) Practice Theory Perspectives on Pedagogy and Education. Singapore: Springer, 23–43.
85.
ScottWRDavisGF (2015) Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open Systems Perspectives. London: Routledge.
86.
SengePMKleinerARobertsC, et al. (1999) The Dance of Change. the Challenges of Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. A Fifth Discipline Resource. London: Nicholas Breadley Publishing.
87.
SimoninBL (2017) N-loop learning: Part I—Of hedgehog, fox, dodo bird and sphinx. The Learning Organization24(3): 169–179.
88.
StarbuckWH (2017) Organizational learning and unlearning. The Learning Organization24(1): 30–38.
89.
TomicW (1993) Behaviorism and cognitivism in education. Psychology30(3/4): 38–46.
90.
VinceRAbbeyGLangenhanM, et al. (2018) Finding critical action learning through paradox: The role of action learning in the suppression and stimulation of critical reflection. Management Learning49(1): 86–106.
91.
VoolaidKEhrlichÜ (2017) Organizational learning of higher education institutions: The case of Estonia. The Learning Organization24(5): 340–354.
92.
WangJ (2019) Demystifying literature reviews: What I have learned from an expert?Human Resource Development Review18(1): 3–15.
93.
WeickKEWestleyF (1996) Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In: CleggSRHardyCNordWR (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: SAGE, 440–458.
94.
ZhouWHuHShiX (2015) Does organizational learning lead to higher firm performance? An investigation of Chinese listing companies. The Learning Organization22(5): 271–288.
