This article addresses the epistemology of learning, as reflected in some discourses of the learning organization. The article is inspired by, and draws substantially from, Lewis Carroll’s ‘Hunting of the Snark’. It employs a broadly systemic theoretical perspective. The article highlights relevant characteristics of Carroll’s fiction and argues for the importance of differentiation between orders of learning, following Bateson’s model of levels of learning. Building on this differentiation of orders of learning, and on the notion of the inevitable paradoxical nature of organizations, the article explores a possible conceptual integration of ‘learning’ and ‘politics’, which Easterby-Smith et al. consider desirable. A question raised is of whether experiences cited as paradigmatic of ‘the learning organization’ are most likely to be transient and emergent. The analysis questions the extent to which such states can be produced through intention and design, and therefore to what extent the wish for these to become permanent states may parallel the hunt for the Snark.
Abma, T. A. (2003) ‘Learning by Telling: Storytelling Workshops as an Organizational Learning Intervention’ , Management Learning34(2): 221-240 .
2.
Alderfer, C. P. (1987) ‘An Intergroup Perspective on Group Dynamics’, in J. Lorsch (ed.) Handbook of Organisational Behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall .
3.
Antonacopoulou, E. (1999) ‘Developing Learning Managers within Learning Organizations: The Case of Three Major Retail Banks’, in M. Easterby-Smith , J. Burgoyne and L. Araujo (eds) (1999) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization, pp. 217-242. London: Sage
4.
ntonacopoulou, E. (2001) ‘The Paradoxical Nature of the Relationship between Training and Learning’ , Journal of Management Studies38(3, May): 327-350 .
5.
Argyris, C. (1999) On Organizational Learning, 2nd edn.Oxford: Blackwell .
6.
Argyris, C. and Schön, D. (1978) Organizational Learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
7.
Bandler, R. and Grinder, J. (1975) The Structure of Magic: A Book about Language and Therapy. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behaviour Books .
8.
Bateson, G. (1973) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. London: Paladin, Granada .
9.
Bateson, G. (1979) Mind and Nature. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins .
10.
Bateson, G. (1991) A Sacred Unity: Further Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Cornelia and Michael Bessie, Harper Collins .
11.
Bateson, G. and Bateson, M. C. (1988) Angels Fear. London: Rider Books .
12.
Burgoyne, J. , Pedler, M. and Boydell, T. (eds) (1994) Towards the Learning Company. London: McGraw-Hill .
13.
Carroll, L. (1974) The Hunting of the Snark, ed. Martin Gardner.London: Penguin .
14.
Collins, D. (1998) Organizational Change: Sociological Perspectives. London: Routledge .
15.
Coopey, J. (1995) ‘The Learning Organization, Power, Politics and Ideology’ , Management Learning26(2): 193-213 .
16.
Dilts, R. (1998) ‘Presuppositions’, available online at: http://www.nlpu.com/Articles/artic20.htm, accessed 26.11.2001.
17.
Dovey, K. (1997) ‘The Learning Organization and the Organization of Learning: Power, Transformation and the Search for Form in Learning Organizations’ , Management Learning28(3): 331-349 .
18.
Easterby-Smith, M. , Burgoyne, J. and Araujo, L. (eds) (1999) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization. London: Sage .
19.
Elkjaer, B. (2001) ‘The Learning Organization: An Undelivered Promise’ , Management Learning32(4): 437-452 .
20.
Engeström, Y. (2000) ‘Activity Theory as a Framework for Analyzing and Redesigning Work’ , Ergonomics43(7): 960-974 .
21.
Fisher, D. , Rooke, D. and Torbert, W. (2001) Personal and Organizational Transformations Through Action Inquiry. Boston, MA: Edge/Work Press .
22.
Fisher, D. and Torbert, W. (1995) Personal and Organizational Transformations. London: McGraw-Hill .
23.
Flemons, D. (1991) Completing Distinctions. Boston, MA: Shambhala .
24.
French, R. and Bazalgette, J. (1996) ‘From “Learning Organization” to “Teaching-Learning Organization”?’ , Management Learning27(1): 113-128 .
25.
Gabriel, Y. (2000) Storytelling in Organizations: Facts, Fictions and Fantasies. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
26.
Garratt, B. (1999) ‘The Learning Organisation 15 Years On: Some Personal Reflections’ , The Learning Organization6(5): 202-206 .
27.
Garratt, B. (2000) The Learning Organization: Developing Democracy at Work. Glasgow: Harper Collins Business .
28.
Garvin, D. (1993) ‘Building a Learning Organization’ , Harvard Business Review (July-August): 78-91 .
29.
Gherardi, S. , Nicolini, D. and Odella, F. (1998) ‘Toward a Social Understanding of How People Learn in Organizations: The Notion of a Situated Curriculum’ , Management Learning29(3): 273-297 .
30.
Grey, C. (1998) ‘Against Learning’ , paper presented at the conference on Emergent Fields in Management: Connecting Learning and Critique, University of Leeds, 15- 17 July 1998.
31.
Huysman, M. (1999) ‘Balancing Biases: A Critical Review of the Literature on Organizational Learning’, in M. Easterby-Smith , J. Burgoyne and L. Araujo (eds) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization, pp. 59-74. London: Sage .
32.
Jankowicz, D. (2000) ‘From “Learning Organization” to “Adaptive Organization”’ , Management Learning31(4): 471-490 .
33.
Keeney, B. (1983) Aesthetics of Change. New York: Guilford Press .
34.
Korzybski, A. (1933) Science and Sanity, 4th edn.Lakeville, CT: International Non-Aristotelian Library Publishing Co .
35.
Lave, J. (1996) ‘Teaching, as Learning, in Practice’ , Mind, Culture and Activity3(3): 149-164 .
36.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
37.
Lewis, M. W. (2000) ‘Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide’ , Academy of Management Review25(4): 760-776 .
38.
Marsick, V. and Watkins, K. (1999) ‘Looking Again at Learning in the Learning Organization: A Tool that can Turn into a Weapon!’ , The Learning Organization6(5): 207-210 .
39.
örtenblad, A. (2002) ‘A Typology of the Idea of Learning Organization’ , Management Learning33(2): 213-230 .
40.
Pedler, M. , Boydell, T. and Burgoyne, J. (1989) ‘Towards the Learning Company’ , Management Education and Development20(1): 1-8 .
41.
Pedler, M. , Burgoyne, J. and Boydell, T. (1991) The Learning Company. London: McGraw-Hill .
42.
Prange, C. (1999) ‘Organizational Learning—Desperately Seeking Theory?’, in M, Easterby-Smith , J. Burgoyne and L. Araujo (eds) Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization, pp. 23-43. London: Sage .
43.
Reason, P. and Hawkins, P. (1988) ‘Inquiry through Storytelling’, in P. Reason (ed.) Human Inquiry In Action: Developments in New Paradigm Research. London: Sage .
44.
Salaman, J. G. (1979) Work Organisations: Resistance and Control. London: Longman .
45.
Senge, P. (1990) The Fifth Discipline. London: Century Business, Random Century .
46.
Senge, P. M. , Roberts, C. , Ross, R. B. , Smith, B. J. and Kleiner, A. (1994) The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook: Strategies and Tools for Building a Learning Organisation. London: Nicholas Brealey .
47.
Shah, I. (1973) The Exploits of the Incredible Mulla Nasrudin. London: Picador .
48.
Smith, P. (1999) ‘The Learning Organization Ten Years On: A Case Study’ , The Learning Organization6(5): 217-223 .
49.
Snyder, Benson R. (1971) The Hidden Curriculum. New York: Knopf .
50.
Stacey, R. D. , Griffin, D. and Shaw, P. (2000) Complexity and Management: Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking?London: Routledge .
51.
Torbert, W. (1991) The Power of Balance. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
52.
Watkins, K. E and Marsick, V. J. (1993) Sculpting the Learning Organization: Lessons in the Art and Science of Systemic Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
53.
Watzlawick, P. (1986) Ultra-Solutions. New York: W.W. Norton & Co .
54.
Watzlawick, P. , Weakland, J. and Fisch, R. (1974) Change—Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton .
55.
Weick, K. (1994) ‘Cartographic Myths in Organisations’, in H. Tsoukas (ed.) New Thinking in Organizational Behaviour. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann .
56.
Wijnhoven, F. (2001) ‘Acquiring Organizational Learning Norms: A Contingency Approach for Understanding Deutero Learning’ , Management Learning32(2): 181-200 .
