Management education programs increasingly use group work as a tool for developing teamwork knowledge and skills. A critical factor identified in prior research to influence group performance in student groups is goal-setting. We test in a sample of 37 groups the effect of group goal configurations and goal difficulty on group performance. We show that goal distance (as the distance between the lowest goal in the group and the rest of individual goals) has a positive impact on group performance. Moreover, we provide empirical evidence for an inverted U-shape association between goal difficulty and group performance. Therefore, our results question the linearity assumptions on the relation between goal difficulty and group performance and open new research directions in group goal-setting.
AckermanDSGrossBL (2010) Instructor feedback: How much do students really want?Journal of Marketing Education32: 2172–2181.
2.
AggarwalPO’BrienCL (2008) Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effects on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education30(3): 255–264.
3.
AikenLWestS (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
4.
AlbersDJReidCDantzigGB (1986) An interview with George B. Dantzig: The father of linear programming. College Mathematics Journal17: 292–314.
5.
AntoniC (2005) Management by objectives—An effective tool for teamwork?International Journal of Human Resource Management16(2): 174–184.
6.
BaumeisterRFBratslavskyEFinkenauerC. (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology5: 323–370.
7.
BuiHTMBaruchY (2012) Learning organizations in higher education: An empirical evaluation within an international context. Management Learning43: 515–544.
8.
BurchGSJAndersonN (2004) Measuring person-team fit: Development and validation of the team selection inventory. Journal of Managerial Psychology19(4): 406–426.
9.
CaseyA (2005) Enhancing individual and organizational learning: A sociological model. Management Learning36(2): 131–147.
10.
ChenGDonahueLMKlimoskiRJ (2004) Training undergraduates to work in organizational teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education3: 27–40.
11.
CottleRW (2006) George B. Dantzig: A legendary life in mathematical programming. Mathematical Programming105: 1–8.
12.
CovingtonMV (2000) Goal theory, motivation, and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology51: 171–200.
13.
CurşeuPPluutH (2013) Student groups as learning entities: The effect of group diversity and teamwork quality on groups’ cognitive complexity. Studies in Higher Education38(1): 87–103.
14.
CurşeuPSchruijerS (2012) Normative interventions, emergent cognition and decision rationality in ad-hoc and established groups. Management Decision50(6): 1062–1075.
15.
DaviesWM (2009) Groupwork as a form of assessment: Common problems and recommended solutions. Higher Education58: 563–584.
16.
DevineDJClaytonLDPhilipsJL. (1999) Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research6: 678–711.
17.
DommeyerCJ (2007) Using the diary method to deal with social loafers on the group project: Its effects on peer evaluations, group behavior and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Education29(2): 175–188.
18.
ErhardtN (2011) Is it all about teamwork? Understanding the processes in team-based knowledge work. Management Learning42(1): 87–112.
19.
FelpsWMitchellTRByingtonE (2006) How, when, and why bad apples spoil the barrel: Negative group members and dysfunctional groups. Research in Organizational Behavior27: 175–222.
20.
FreemanLGreenacreL (2011) An examination of socially destructive behaviors in group work. Journal of Marketing Education33(1): 5–17.
21.
GabrielYGriffithsDS (2008) International learning groups: Synergies and dysfunctions. Management Learning39(5): 503–518.
22.
HallingerPLuJ (2011) Assessing the instructional effectiveness of problem-based management education in Thailand. Management Learning42(3): 279–299.
23.
HarrisDN (2010) How do school peers influence student educational outcomes? Theory and evidence from economics and other social sciences. Teachers College Record112: 1163–1197.
24.
HoxbyCMWeingarthG (2005) Taking race out of the equation: School reassignment and the structure of peer effects. Unpublished manuscript.
25.
HuxhamCVangenS (2005) Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. London: Routledge.
26.
IsenbergDJ (1986) Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology50(6): 1141–1151.
27.
JohnsonDWJohnsonFP (1975) Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
28.
JonesCConnollyMGearA. (2006) Collaborative learning with group interactive technology: A case study with postgraduate students. Management Learning37(3): 377–396.
29.
KerrNLRumbleACParkES. (2009) “How many bad apples does it take to spoil the whole barrel?” Social exclusion and toleration for bad apples. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45(4): 603–613.
30.
KleinKJKozlowksiSWJ (2000) From micro to meso: Critical steps in conceptualizing and conducting multilevel research. Organizational Research Methods3: 211–236.
31.
KleingeldAvan MierloHArendsL (2011) The effect of goal setting on group performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology96: 1289–1304.
32.
Kristof-BrownALStevensCK (2001) Goal congruence in project teams: Does the fit between members’ personal mastery goals and performance goals matter?Journal of Applied Psychology86: 1083–1095.
O’Leary-KellyAMMartocchioJJFrinkDD (1994) A review of the influence of group goals on group performance. Academy of Management Journal37: 1285–1301.
38.
PerritonLHodgsonV (2013) Positioning theory and practice question(s) within the field of management learning. Management Learning44(2): 144–160.
39.
RollinsonDBroadfieldAEdwardsDJ (1998) Organisational Behaviour and Analysis: An Integrated Approach. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.
40.
SanchezRJBauerTNParontoME (2006) Peer-mentoring freshman: Implications for satisfaction, commitment, and retention to graduation. Academy of Management Learning & Education5: 25–37.
41.
SwartJHarcupJ (2012) “If I learn do we learn?”: The link between executive coaching and organizational learning. Management Learning. Epub ahead of print 12 June 2012. DOI: 10.1177/1350507612447916.
42.
TrankCQRynesSLBretzRD (2002) Attracting applicants in the war for talent: Differences in work preferences among high achievers. Journal of Business and Psychology16(3): 331–345.
43.
VancouverJBSchmittNW (1991) An exploratory examination of person-organization fit: Organizational goal congruence. Personnel Psychology44: 333–352.
44.
VangenSHuxhamC (2011) The tangled web: Unraveling the principle of common goals in collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Epub ahead of print 21 December 2011. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mur065.
45.
WidmeyerWNDucharmeK (1997) Team building through team goal setting. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology9: 97–113.
46.
WrightPM (1992) A theoretical examination of the construct validity of operationalizations of goal difficulty. Human Resource Management Review2: 275–298.
47.
ZanderA (1980) The origins and consequences of group goals. In: FestingerL (ed.) Retrospections on Social Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 205–235.
48.
ZimmermanDJ (2003) Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics85: 9–23.
49.
ZimmermanDKGallagherSR (2006) Creativity and team environment: An exercise illustrating how much one member can matter. Journal of Management Education30(4): 617–625.
