This article reviews goal-setting theory in terms of the causal relationships it specifies, the boundary conditions within which the causal relationships occur, and the mediators that explain the causal relationships. Three types of goals are described: performance, behavioral, and learning. Emphasis in the article is placed on findings regarding the beneficial effect of setting a specific, difficult learning goal.
AmesC.ArcherJ. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
2.
AshfordS.De StobbeleirK. (2013). Feedback, goal-setting, and task performance revisited. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 51-64). New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4.
BanduraA. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
5.
BarghJ. A. (1990). Auto-motives: Preconscious determinants of social interaction. In HiggensE. T.SorrentinoR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 2, pp. 93-130). New York, NY: Guilford.
6.
BarghJ. A.GollwitzerP. M.OettingenG. (2010). Motivation. In FiskeS.GilbertD. T.LindzayG. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 268-316). New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
BrownS. P.CronW. L.SlocumJ. (1997). Effects of goal-directed emotions on salesperson volitions, behavior, and performance. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 39-50.
8.
BrownT. C.LathamG. P. (2002). The effects of behavioural outcome goals, learning goals, and urging people to do their best on an individual’s teamwork behaviour in a group problem-solving task. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 34, 276-285.
9.
BrownT. C.LathamG. P. (2006). The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on performance effectiveness in a MBA program. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 38, 1-11.
10.
ChenX. E.LathamG. P. (2014). The effect of priming learning vs. performance goals on a complex task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125, 88-97.
11.
CianciA. M.KleinH. J.SeijtsG. H. (2010). The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: The main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 618-630.
12.
CronW. L.SlocumJ.VandewalleD.FuF. (2005). The role of goal orientation on negative emotions and goal setting when initial performance falls short of one’s performance goal. Human Performance, 18, 55-80.
13.
Drach-ZahavyA.ErezM. (2002). Challenge versus threat effects on the goal-performance relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 88, 667-682.
14.
DurhamC. C.PoonJ.LockeE. A.McLeodP. (2000). Effects of group goals and time pressure on group efficacy, information-seeking strategy, and performance. Human Performance, 13, 115-138.
15.
DweckC. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
16.
DweckC. S.LeggettE. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.
17.
EarleyP. C.ConnollyT.EkergrenG. (1989). Goals, strategy development, and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 24-33.
18.
FlanaganJ. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327-358.
19.
FrayneC. A.LathamG. P. (1987). The application of social learning theory to employee self-management of attendance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 387-392.
20.
KanferR.AckermanP. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: An integrative/aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 657-690.
21.
KozlowskiS. W.BellB. S. (2006). Disentangling achievement orientation and goal setting: Effects on self-regulatory processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 900-916.
22.
KramerW. S.ThayerA. L.SalasE. (2013). Goal setting in teams. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal and task performance (pp. 287-310). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
LathamG. P.ArshoffA. S. (2013). The relevance of goal setting theory for human resource management. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal and task performance (pp. 331-342). New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
LathamG. P.BrownT. C. (2006). The effect of learning vs. outcome goals on self-efficacy and satisfaction in a MBA Program. Applied Psychology, 55, 606-623.
25.
LathamG. P.BudworthM. H. (2006). The effect of training in verbal self-guidance on the self-efficacy and performance of Native North Americans in the selection interview. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68, 516-523.
26.
LathamG. P.ErezM.LockeE. A. (1988). Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application of the Erez-Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 753-772.
27.
LathamG. P.FrayneC. A. (1989). Self-management training for increasing job attendance: A follow-up and a replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 411-416.
28.
LathamG. P.LeeT. W. (1986). Goal setting. In LockeE. A. (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings for industrial-organizational psychology, organizational behavior, and human resource management (pp. 101-117). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
29.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (2007). New developments in and directions for goal setting. European Psychologist, 12, 290-300.
30.
LathamG. P.LockeE. A. (in press). Goal setting theory: Controversies and resolutions. In OnesD.AndersonN.ViswesvaranC.SinangilH. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work & organizational psychology (Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.
31.
LathamG. P.MitchellT. R.DossettD. L. (1978). The importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 163-171.
32.
LathamG. P.SeijtsG. H.CrimD. (2008). The effects of learning goal difficulty level and cognitive ability on strategies and performance. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 40, 220-229.
33.
LathamG. P.WexleyK. N. (1977). Behavioral observation scales for performance appraisal purposes. Personnel Psychology, 30, 255-268.
34.
LathamG. P.WintersD. C.LockeE. A. (1994). Cognitive and motivational effects of participation: A mediator study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 49-63.
35.
LockeE. A. (Ed.). (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
36.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
37.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57, 705-717.
38.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2013). Goal setting theory: The current state. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 623-630). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
MasudaA.LockeE. A.WilliamsK. J. (2015). The effects of simultaneous learning and performance goals on performance: An inductive exploration. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 32-52.
40.
MawritzM.FolgerR.LathamG. P. (2014). Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: The mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 358-372.
41.
MillmanZ.LathamG. P. (2001). Increasing reemployment through training in verbal self-guidance. In ErezM.KleinbeckU.ThierryH. K. (Eds.), Work motivation in the context of a globalizing economy (pp. 87-98). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42.
MinerJ. B. (2003). The rated importance, scientific validity, and practical usefulness of organizational behavior theories: A quantitative review. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2, 250-268.
43.
Miron-SpektorE.BeenenG. (2015). Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127, 53-65.
44.
MitchellT. R.DanielsD. (2003). Motivation. In BormanW. C.IlgenD. R.KlimoskiR. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Industrial organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 225-254). New York, NY: Wiley.
45.
MoneM. A.ShalleyC. E. (1995). Effects of task complexity and goal specificity on change in strategy and performance over time. Human Performance, 8, 243-262.
46.
NoelT.LathamG. P. (2006). The importance of learning goals versus outcome goals for entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 7, 213-220.
47.
PinderC. C. (1998). Work motivation: Theory, issues, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
PorterR. L.LathamG. P. (2013). The effect of employee learning goals and goal commitment on departmental performance. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20, 62-68.
49.
PritchardR. D.YoungB. L.KoenigN.SchmerlingD.DixonN. W. (2013). Long term effects of goal setting on performance with the Productivity Measurement and Enhancement System (ProMES). In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal and task performance (pp. 233-245). New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
RodgersR.HunterJ. E. (1991). Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 322-336.
51.
SeijtsG. H.CrimD. (2009). The combined effects of goal type and cognitive ability on performance. Motivation and Emotion, 33, 343-352.
52.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P. (2001). The effect of learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 291-307.
53.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P. (2011). The effect of commitment to a learning goal, self-efficacy, and the interaction between learning goal difficulty and commitment on performance in a business simulation. Human Performance, 24, 189-204.
54.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P.TasaK.LathamB. W. (2004). Goal setting and goal orientation: An integration of two different yet related literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 227-239.
55.
SeijtsG. H.LathamG. P.WoodwarkM. (2013). Learning goals: A qualitative and quantitative review. In LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 195-212). New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
ShantzA.LathamG. P. (2009). An exploratory field experiment of the effect of subconscious and conscious goals on employee performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109, 9-17.
57.
ShantzA.LathamG. P. (2011). The effect of primed goals on employee performance: Implications for human resource management. Human Resource Management, 50, 289-299.
58.
TasaK.CelaniA.BellC. (2013). Goals in negotiation revisited: The impact of goal setting and implicit negotiation beliefs. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 6, 102-120.
59.
VandewalleD.CronW. L.SlocumJ. (2001). The role of goal orientation following performance feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629-640.
60.
WalfishS.McAlisterB.O’DonnellP.LambertM. J. (2012). An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110, 639-644.
61.
WintersD.LathamG. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group & Organization Management, 21, 236-250.
62.
WoodwarkM. J. (2015). Working harder, working smarter, or doing both? How the interpretation of combined learning and performance goals affects complex task performance. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository (Paper No. 3124). Retrieved from http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/3124
63.
YanarB.BudworthM. H.LathamG. P. (2009). The effect of verbal self-guidance training for overcoming employment barriers: A study of Turkish Women. Applied Psychology, 58, 586-601.
