The main objective of this article is to explore the challenges for globalizing knowledge management theories. Adopting a practice-based view of knowledge and engaging critically with Nonaka’s SECI (socialization, externalization, combination and internalization) model, the hidden behavioral assumptions and cultural values and meanings embedded within the model are revealed so as to provide a thought experiment to explain the organizational and inter-cultural dynamics that may disrupt its translation in overseas contexts. It is argued that a successful implementation of Nonaka’s SECI model requires a ‘glocalized’ approach, which involves trade-offs between core underlying values and objectives during the process of local translation. This article contributes to current theories of knowledge management by revealing the underlying sources of cultural embeddedness and the implications for their global diffusion.
AbramsonNLaneHNagaiHTagakiH (1993) A comparison of Canadian and Japanese cognitive styles: Implication for management interaction. Journal of International Business Studies24(3): 575–587.
2.
AndrewsKDelahayeBN (2000) Influences on knowledge processes in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies37(6): 797–810.
3.
BhagatR. (2002) Cultural variations in the cross-border transfer of organizational knowledge: An integrative framework. Academy of Management Review27(2): 204–221.
4.
BlacklerF (1995) Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies16(6): 1021–1046.
5.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BourdieuP (1990) The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
7.
BrannenM (2004) When Mickey loses face: Recontextualization, semiotic fit and the semiotics of foreignness. Academy of Management Review29(4): 593–616.
8.
BrownJSDuguidP (1991) Organizational learning and communities of practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science2(1): 40–57.
9.
CarlileP (2002) A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science13(4): 442–455.
10.
CarlileP (2004) Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science15(5): 555–568.
11.
CarmonaSGronlundA (1998) Learning from forgetting: An experiential study of two European car manufacturers. Management Learning29(1): 21–38.
12.
ChikudateN (1999) The state of collective myopia in Japanese business communities: A phenomenological study for exploring blocking mechanisms for change. Journal of Management Studies36(1): 69–86.
13.
ChildJMarkoczyL (1993) Host-country managerial behavior and learning in Chinese and Hungarian joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies30(4): 611–631.
14.
ColeRE (1989) Strategies for Learning. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
CollinsonSWilsonD (2006) Inertia in Japanese organizations: Knowledge management routines and failure to innovate. Organization Studies27(9): 1359–1387.
16.
CunliffeA (2002) Reflexive dialogical practice in management learning. Management Learning33(1): 35–61.
17.
CunliffeA (2008) Orientations to social constructionism: Relationally responsive social constructionism and its implications for knowledge and learning. Management Learning39(2): 123–139.
18.
CzarniawskaBJoergesB (1996) Travel of ideas. In: CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter, 13–48.
19.
CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) (1996) Translating Organizational Change. Berlin: de Gruyter.
20.
CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Malmo: Liber.
21.
CzegledyAP (1996) New directions for organizational learning in Eastern Europe. Organization Studies17(2): 327–341.
22.
D’EreditaMBarretoC (2006) How does tacit knowledge proliferate? An episode-based perspective. Organization Studies27(12): 1821–1841.
23.
Easterby-SmithM (1998) Organizational learning and national culture: Do models of organizational learning apply outside the USA?Bolletin de Estudios Economicos53(164): 281–296.
24.
Easterby-SmithMLylesM (2003) Introduction: Watersheds of organizational learning and knowledge management. In: Easterby-SmithMLylesM (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 1–15.
25.
EdmondsonA (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 350–383.
26.
FeldmanM (2000) Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science11(6): 611–629.
27.
FeldmanMPentlandBT (2003) Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly48: 94–118.
28.
FukuyamaF (1995) Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London: Hamish Hamilton Press.
29.
GherardiS (2000) Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization7(2): 211–223.
30.
GherardiS (2010) Telemedicine: A practice-based approach to technology. Human Relations63(4): 501–524.
31.
GiulianottiRRobertsonR (2007) Forms of glocalization: Globalization and the migration strategies of Scottish football fans in North America. Sociology41(1): 133–152.
32.
GlisbyMHoldenN (2003) Contextual constraints in knowledge management theory: The cultural embeddedness of Nonaka’s knowledge creating company. Knowledge and Process Management10(1): 29–36.
33.
GourlayS (2006) Conceptualizing knowledge creation: A critique of Nonaka’s theory. Journal of Management Studies43(7): 1415–1436.
34.
GueldenbergSHeltingH (2007) Bridging ‘the great divide’: Nonaka’s synthesis of ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ knowledge concepts reassessed. Organization14(1): 101–122.
35.
HofstedeG (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values. Beverly-Hills, CA: Sage.
36.
HongJSnellR (2008) Power inequality in cross-cultural learning: The case of Japanese transplants in China. Asia Pacific Business Review14(2): 253–273.
37.
HongJEasterby-SmithMSnellR (2006a) Transferring organizational learning systems to Japanese subsidiaries in China. Journal of Management Studies43(5): 1027–1058.
38.
HongJSnellREasterby-SmithM (2006b) Cross cultural influences of organizational learning in MNCs: The case of Japanese companies in China. Journal of International Management12(4): 408–429.
39.
HongJSnellREasterby-SmithM (2009) Knowledge flow and boundary crossing at the periphery of a MNC. International Business Review18(6): 539–554.
40.
KagonoTNonakaISakakibaraKOkumuraA (1985) Strategic and Evolutionary Management: A US-Japan Comparison of Strategy and Organization. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publisher.
41.
KasperH. (2010) Thinning knowledge: An interpretive field study of knowledge sharing practices in three multinational contexts. Journal of Management Inquiry19(4): 367–381.
42.
KoikeK (1984) Skill formation systems in the US and Japan. In: AokiM (ed.) The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing, 47–75.
43.
KumonS (1992) Japan as a network society. In: KumonSRosovskyH (eds) The Political Economy of Japan. Vol. 3. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 109–141.
44.
LamA (2003) Organizational learning in multinationals: R and D networks of Japanese and US MNEs in the UK. Journal of Management Studies40(3): 673–703.
45.
LatourB (1986) The powers of association. In: LawJ (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 264–280.
46.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
LawJ (1992) Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. System Practice5(4): 379–393.
48.
LervikJELunnanR (2004) Contrasting perspectives on the diffusion of management knowledge: Performance management in a Norwegian multinational. Management Learning35(3): 287–302.
49.
MichailovaSHustedK (2003) Knowledge-sharing hostility in Russian firms. California Management Review45(3): 59–77.
50.
MinamiH (1971) Psychology of Japanese People (Translated by IkomaAI). Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press.
51.
NelsonRWinterS (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52.
NicoliniD (2007) Stretching out and expanding work practices in time and space: The case of telemedicine. Human Relations60(6): 889–920.
53.
NicoliniD (2009) Zooming in and out: Studying practices by switching theoretical lens and trailing connections. Organization Studies30(12): 1391–1418.
54.
NicoliniD (2010) Medical innovation as a process of translation: A case from the field of telemedicine. British Journal of Management21: 1011–1126.
55.
NonakaI (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science5(1): 14–37.
56.
NonakaIJohanssonJK (1985) Japanese management: What about the hard skills?Academy of Management Review10(2): 181–191.
57.
NonakaIKonoN (1998) The concept of ‘ba’: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review40(3): 1–15.
58.
NonakaITakeuchiK (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. New York: Oxford University Press.
59.
NonakaIToyamaR (2007) Strategic management as distributed practical wisdom (phronesis). Industrial and Corporate Change16(3): 371–394.
60.
NonakaIvon KroghG (2009) Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science20(3): 635–652.
61.
NonakaIToyamaRHirataT (2008) Managing Flow: A Process Theory of the Knowledge-Based Firm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
62.
NonakaIToyamaRKonnoN (2000) SECI, ba and leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning33(1): 5–34.
OrlikowskiW (2002) Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science13(3): 249–273.
65.
OuchiW (1980) Markets, bureaucracies and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly25: 129–141.
66.
PentlandBFeldmanM (2005) Organizational routine as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change14(5): 793–815.
67.
PentlandBRueterH (1994) Organizational routines as grammars of action. Administrative Science Quarterly39: 484–510.
68.
PolanyiM (1962) Personal Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69.
PorterMTakeuchiHSakakibaraM (2000) Can Japan Compete?London: Macmillan.
70.
RibeiroRCollinsH (2007) The bread making machine: Tacit knowledge and two types of action. Organization Studies28(9): 1417–1433.
71.
RobertsonR (1994) Globalization or glocalization?Journal of International Communication1(1): 33–52.
72.
SakaA (2004) The cross-national diffusion of work systems: Translation of Japanese operation in the UK. Organization Studies25(2): 209–228.
73.
Saka-HelmhoutA (2009) Agency-based view of learning within multinational corporations. Management Learning40(3): 259–274.
74.
SaralaRVaaraE (2010) Cultural differences, convergence, and crossvergence as explanations of knowledge transfer in international acquisition. Journal of International Business Studies41(8): 1365–1390.
75.
ShenkarOLouYYeheskelO (2008) From ‘distance’ to ‘friction’: Substituting metaphors and redirecting intercultural research. Academy of Management Review33(4): 905–923.
76.
SoleDEdmondsonA (2002) Situated knowledge and learning in dispersed teams. British Journal of Management13(S2): S17–S34.
77.
SpenderJC (1996) Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal17(winter special issue): 45–62.
78.
TakeoD (1962) Amae: A key concept for understanding Japanese personality. In: SmithRJBeardsleyRK (eds) Japanese Culture: Its Development and Characteristics. Chicago, IL: Aldine, 132–138.
79.
TakeuchiHNonakaI (1986) The new product development game. Harvard Business ReviewJan–Feb: 137–146.
80.
TeeceD (2008) Foreword: From the management of R and D to knowledge. In: NonakaIToyamaRHirataT (eds) Managing Flow: A Process Theory of the Knowledge-Based Firm. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan, ix–xvii.
81.
TsoukasH (2003) Do we really understand tacit knowledge? In: Easterby-SmithMLylesM (eds) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 410–427.
82.
TsoukasHVladimirouE (2001) What is organizational knowledge?Journal of Management Studies38(7): 973–993.
83.
UekiHUekiMLinowesRMrockowskiT (2011) A comparative study of enablers of knowledge creation in Japan and US-based firms. Asian Business and Management10(2): 113–132.
84.
von KroghGIchijoKNonakaI (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
85.
von KroghGNonakaIIchijoK (1997) Develop knowledge activists!European Management Journal15(5): 475–483.
86.
WeirDHutchingsK (2005) Cultural embeddedness and contextual constraints: Knowledge sharing in Chinese and Arab cultures. Knowledge and Process Management12(2): 89–98.
87.
WengerE (1998) Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88.
WilkesmannUWilkesmannMVirgillitoA (2009) The absence of cooperation is not necessarily defection: Structural and motivational constraints of knowledge transfer in a social dilemma situation. Organization Studies30(10): 1141–1164.
89.
WongM (2001) Internationalizing Japanese expatriate managers: Organizational learning through international assignment. Management Learning32(2): 237–251.
90.
YoshimuraNAndersonP (1997) Inside the Kaisha: Demystifying Japanese Business Behavior. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
