Can the teaching of leadership transform practice? What concepts and modalities are best suited to do so? This article builds on Meyer and Land’s (2003) theory of threshold concepts to examine how students learn and experience leadership as a complex and multi-faceted practice. Threshold concepts are conceptual gateways, opening up new and previously inaccessible ways of thinking about a field. In an ethnographic account using participant observation, analysis of student papers, and in-depth interviews, the authors identified two threshold concepts that had a transformational impact on students: (1) situational leadership and (2) shared leadership. In addition, they found three modalities that supported the learning of threshold concepts: (1) variation, (2) enactment, and (3) reflection. The article concludes by citing the broader implications for the research and teaching of leadership practice.
ArcherMS (2007) Making our Way through the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2.
ArgyrisCSchönDA (1978) Organizational Learning. A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
AvolioBJGardnerWLWalumbwaFOLuthansFMayDR (2004) Unlocking the mask: A look at the process by which authentic leaders impact follower attitudes and behaviors. Leadership Quarterly15(6): 801–823.
4.
BanduraA (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5.
BassBM (1985) Leadership and Performance beyond Expectations. New York: Free Press.
BlakeRRMoutonJS (1964) The Managerial Grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.
8.
BoldenRGoslingJ (2006) Leadership competencies: Time to change the tune?Leadership2(2): 147–163.
9.
BourdieuP (1977) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.
BowdenJMartonF (1998) The University of Learning. London: Kogan Page.
11.
BronfenbrennerU (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
BrownJSDuguidP (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science2: 40–57.
13.
BrownJCollinsADuguidP (1989) Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher18(1): 32–42.
14.
CaseyAJGoldmanEF (2010) Enhancing the ability to think strategically: A learning model. Management Learning41(2): 167–185.
15.
ChiMTHRoscoeRD (2002) The processes and challenges of conceptual change. In: LimonMMasonL (eds) Reconsidering Conceptual Change: Issues in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic, 3–27.
16.
ChiaRHoltR (2006) Strategy as practical coping: A Heideggerian perspective. Organization Studies27(5): 635–655.
17.
ChiaRHoltR (2008) The nature of knowledge in business schools. Academy of Management Learning & Education7: 471–486.
18.
CongerJA (1998) Qualitative research as the cornerstone methodology for understanding leadership. Leadership Quarterly9(1): 107–121.
19.
CongerJAKanungoRN (1987) Toward a behavioral theory of charismatic leadership in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review12(4): 637–647.
20.
CorbinJStraussA (2008) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd edn.Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
21.
CorradiGGherardiSVerzelloniL (2010) Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading?Management Learning41(3): 265–283.
22.
CrevaniLLindgrenMPackendorffJ (2007) Shared leadership: A postheroic perspective on leadership as a collective construction. International Journal of Leadership Studies3(1): 40–67.
23.
CunliffeAL (2009) The philosopher leader: On relationalism, ethics and reflexivity—a critical perspective to teaching leadership. Management Learning40(1): 87–101.
24.
DaviesPManganJ (2007) Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics. Studies in Higher Education32(6): 711–726.
25.
DayDVGronnPSalasE (2004) Leadership capacity in teams. Leadership Quarterly15(6): 857–880.
26.
DeRueDSAshfordSJ (2010) Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Academy of Management Review35(4): 627–647.
27.
DornerD (1996) The Logic of Failure: Why Things Go Wrong and What We Can Do to Make them Right. New York: Holt.
28.
EdenCHuxhamC (1996) Action research for the study of organizations. In: CleggSRHardyCNordWR (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, 526–542.
29.
EdmondsonA (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly44(2): 350–383.
30.
EikelandO (2009) Habitus-validity in organizational theory and research: Social research and work life transformed. In: BrøggerBEikelandO (eds) Turning to Practice with Action Research. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang, 33–66.
31.
FiedlerFE (1967) A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
FordJHardingN (2007) Move over management: We are all leaders now. Management Learning38(5): 475–493.
33.
FordP (2006) Discourses of leadership: Gender, identity, and contradiction in a UK public sector organization. Leadership2(1): 77–99.
34.
GardnerH (2004) Changing Minds. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
35.
GeigerD (2009) Revisiting the concept of practice: Toward an argumentative understanding of practicing. Management Learning40(2): 129–144.
36.
GoetzJPLeCompteMD (1984) Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research. 2nd edn.Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
37.
GraeffCL (1983) The situational leadership theory: A critical review. Academy of Management Review8(2): 285–291.
38.
GraenGBUhl-BienM (1995) Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years, applying a multilevel multidomain perspective. Leadership Quarterly6(2): 219–247.
39.
GrintK (2010) The sacred in leadership: Separation, sacrifice and silence. Organization Studies31(1): 89–107.
40.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (1983) Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London: Tavistock.
41.
HardyCPhillipsNCleggS (2001) Reflexivity in organization and management theory: A study of the production of the research ‘subject’. Human Relations54(5): 531–560.
HibbertP (2009) Reflexivity as a threshold concept: Troublesome understanding. In: SolomonGT (ed.) Best Paper Proceedings of the Sixty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Chicago, 7–11August, 1–6.
JudgeTAPiccoloRFKosalkaT (2009) The bright and dark sides of leader traits: A review and theoretical extension of the leader trait paradigm. Leadership Quarterly20(6): 855–875.
46.
KeganR (1994) In Over our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
KempsterSParryKW (2011) Grounded theory and leadership research: A critical realist perspective. Leadership Quarterly22(1): 106–120.
48.
KempsterSStewartJ (2010) Becoming a leader: A co-produced autoethnographic exploration of situated learning of leadership practice. Management Learning41(2): 205–219.
49.
KileyMWiskerG (2009) Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research and Development28(4): 431–441.
50.
KnightsDWillmottH (1992) Conceptualizing leadership processes: A study of senior managers in a financial services company. Journal of Management Studies29(6): 761–782.
51.
KvaleS (1996) Interviews: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. London; New Delhi: Sage.
52.
LandRMeyerJHFSmithJ (eds) (2008) Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense.
53.
LandRCousinGMeyerJHFDaviesP (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. In: RustC (ed.) Improving Student Learning: Diversity and Inclusivity. Oxford: Oxford Brookes University, 53–64.
54.
LatherP (1998) Critical pedagogy and its complicities: A praxis of stuck places. Educational Theory48(4): 487–498.
LewisMWDehlerGE (2000) Learning through paradox: A pedagogical strategy for exploring contradictions and complexity. Journal of Management Education24(6): 708–725.
57.
LockeK (2001) Grounded Theory in Management Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58.
LordRGLevyPE (1994) Moving from cognition to action: A control theory perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review43(3): 335–367.
59.
LouisMRBartunekJM (1992) Insider/outsider research teams: Collaboration across diverse perspectives. Journal of Management Inquiry1(2): 101–110.
60.
LucasUMladenovicR (2006) Developing new world views: threshold concepts in introductory accounting. In: MeyerJHFLandR (eds) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 148–159.
61.
LuomaM (2006) A play of four arenas. Management Learning37(1): 101–123.
62.
LynchKD (2007) Modeling role enactment: Linking role theory and social cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour37(4): 379–399.
63.
McCauleyCDDrathWHPalusCJO’ConnorPMBakerBA (2006) The use of constructive-developmental theory to advance the understanding of leadership. Leadership Quarterly17(6): 634–653.
64.
McNiffJWhiteheadJ (2002) Action Research: Principles and Practice. London: Routledge.
65.
MarquardtMJ (1999) Action Learning in Action. Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black.
66.
MeyerJHFLandR (2003) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (1): Linkages to ways of thinking and practising. In: RustC (ed.) Improving Student Learning: Theory and Practice: Ten Years On. Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University, 412–424.
67.
MeyerJHFLandR (2005) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education49(3): 373–388.
68.
MeyerJHFLandR (2006) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Issues of liminality. In: MeyerJHFLandR (eds) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 19–32.
69.
MeyerJHFLandR (2008) Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (5): Dynamics of assessment. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Threshold Concepts, Threshold Concepts: From Theory to Practice, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 25–27 June.
70.
MeyerJHFWardSCLatreilleP (2009) Threshold concepts and metalearning capacity. International Review of Economics Education8(1): 132–154.
71.
MezirowJ (1981) A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education Quarterly32(1): 3–24.
72.
MezirowJ (1990) Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A Guide to Transformative and Emancipatory Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
73.
MintzbergH (2004) Managers not MBAs. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
74.
NersessianNJ (2008) Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75.
ParkEJLightG (2009) Identifying atomic structure as a threshold concept: Student mental models and troublesomeness. International Journal of Science Education31(2): 233–245.
76.
PearceCLCongerJA (2003) Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
PedlerM (2008) Action Learning for Managers. Aldershot: Gower.
79.
PeirceCS (1992) Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. In: HouserNKloeselC (eds) The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, Vol 1. (1863–1893). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 189–199.
80.
PerkinsD (2005) Beyond Understanding: Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines. Rotterdam and Taipei: Sense.
81.
PiagetJ (1951) The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
82.
PinkerS (2007) The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature. New York: Viking.
83.
PolanyiM (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
84.
RaelinJA (2007) Learning to Engage: A Guide to Leaderful Practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
85.
RaelinJA (2001) Public reflection as the basis for learning. Management Learning32(1): 11–30.
86.
RaelinJA (2006) Does action learning promote collaborative leadership?Academy of Management Learning and Education5: 152–168.
87.
RaelinJA (2008) Work-Based Learning: Bridging Knowledge and Action in the Workplace. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
88.
RaelinJARaelinJD (2006) Developmental action learning: Toward collaborative change. Action Learning: Research and Practice3(1): 45–67.
89.
RamseyC (2011) Provocative theory and a scholarship of practice. Management Learning42(forthcoming). DOI: 10.1177/135050761039441010.1177/1350507610394410.
90.
ReasonP (1999) Integrating action and reflection through co-operative inquiry. Management Learning30(2): 207–225.
91.
RowbottomDP (2007) Demystifying threshold concepts. Journal of Philosophy of Education41(2): 263–270.
92.
RyleG (1949) The Concept of Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
SchwartzmanL (2007) Student defensiveness as a threshold to reflective learning in software design. Informatics in Education6(1): 197–214.
98.
ShondrickSJDinhJELordRG (2010) Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. Leadership Quarterly21(6): 959–978.
99.
ShotterJ (2006) Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies27(4): 585–604.
100.
SpillaneJPHalversonRDiamondJB (2004) Towards a theory of leadership practice: a distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies36(1): 3–34.
101.
StogdillRM (1948) Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Psychology25: 35–71.
102.
TaylorC (2006) Threshold concepts in biology: Do they fit the definition? In: MeyerJHFLandR (eds) Overcoming Barriers to Student Understanding: Threshold Concepts and Troublesome Knowledge. New York: Routledge, 87–99.
103.
WeberM (1970) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, GerthHMillsCW (eds). London: Routledge.
104.
WeickKE (1996) Enactment and the boundaryless career: Organizing as we work. In: ArthurMRousseauDM (eds) Boundaryless Careers. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 40–57.
105.
WeickKERobertsKH (1993) Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly38(September): 357–381.
106.
YammarinoFJDionneSDSchriesheimCADansereauF (2008) Authentic leadership and positive organizational behavior: A meso, multi-level perspective. Leadership Quarterly19(6): 693–707.
107.
YorksLO’NeilJMarsickVJ (eds) (1999) Advances in Developing Human Resources: Action learning: Successful Strategies for Individual, Team and Organizational Development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett Koehler.
108.
ZanderCBoustedtJEckerdalAMcCartneyRMoströmJERatcliffeMSandersK (2008) Threshold concepts in computer science: A multi-national empirical investigation. In: LandRMeyerJHFSmithJ (eds) Threshold Concepts Within the Disciplines. Rotterdam: Sense, 105–118.
109.
ZundelMKokkalisP (2010) Theorizing as engaged practice. Organization Studies31(9–10): 1209–1227.
