This article investigates knowledge integration in product development projects. While much previous literature draws attention to the need for clearly specified goals, extensive knowledge sharing and close face-to-face interaction for activity and knowledge integration, alternative explanations are offered. The findings highlight the integrative capacity of individuals’ experience and tacit foreknowledge of the stacker artefact, as well as the complementary role of meetings and ad hoc problem solving. The article proposes an iterative model of the individual/collective dynamics involved and calls attention to its economizing potential. More generally, it provides an example of how the issue of knowledge integration may be reformulated into a dynamic perspective, recognizing the intergenerational learning benefits that accrue. The conclusions extend the argument of Zollo and Winter by showing how different task-related learning mechanisms may be combined and obtain their integrative capacity within an iterative process.
Allen, T. (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Alvesson, M and Sköldberg, K. (2000) Towards a Reflexive Methodology: New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage .
3.
Becker, M. C. (2004) ‘Organizational Routines: A Review of the Literature’ , Industrial and Corporate Change13(4): 643-677 .
4.
Brunsson, N. (1982) ‘The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality: Decisions, Ideologies and Organisational Actions’ , Journal of Management Studies19(1): 29-44 .
5.
Carlile, P. R. (2002) ‘A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development’ , Organization Science13(4): 442-455 .
6.
Davies, A. and Brady, T. (2000) ‘Organisational Capabilities and Learning in Complex Product Systems: Towards Repeatable Solutions’ , Research Policy29(7-8): 931-953 .
7.
Dosi, G. (1988) ‘Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’ , Journal of Economic Literature26(4): 1120-1171 .
8.
Dougherty, D. (1992) ‘Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms’ , Organization Science3(2): 179-202 .
9.
Dyer, W. G. and Wilkins, A. L. (1991) ‘Better Stories, not Better Constructs, to Generate Better Theory: A Rejoinder to Eisenhardt’ , Academy of Management Review16(3): 613-619 .
10.
Eisenhardt, K. M. and. Tabrizi, B. N. (1995) ‘Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry’ , Administrative Science Quarterly40(1): 84-110 .
11.
Foray, D. and Steinmueller, W. E. (2001) ‘Replication of Routine, the Domestication of Tacit Knowledge and the Economics of Inscription Technology: A Brave New World?’ , paper presented at the DRUID Nelson and Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark.
12.
Freeman, C. (1994) ‘Critical Survey: The Economics of Technological Change’ , Cambridge Journal of Economics18: 463-514 .
13.
Frohm, C. (2002) ‘Collective Competence in an Interdisciplinary Context’, licentiate thesis, Department of Management and Economics, Linköping University.
14.
Garcia, R. and Calantone, R. (2002) ‘A Critical Look at Technological Innovation Typology and Innovativeness Terminology: A Literature Review’ , Journal of Product Innovation Management19(2): 110-132 .
15.
Gittell, J. H. (2002) ‘Coordinating Mechanisms in Care Provider Groups: Relational Coordination as a Mediator and Input Uncertainty as a Moderator of Performance Effects’ , Management Science48(11): 1408-1426 .
16.
Grandori, A. (2001) ‘Neither Hierarchy nor Identity: Knowledge-governance Mechanisms and the Theory of the Firm’ , Journal of Management and Governance5(3): 381-399 .
17.
Grant, R. M. (1996) ‘Towards a Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm’ , Strategic Management Journal17(Winter Special Issue): 109-122 .
18.
Hansen, M. T. (1999) ‘The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits’ , Administrative Science Quarterly44(1): 82-111 .
19.
Hansen, M. T. , Nohria, N. and Tierney, T. (1999) ‘What’s Your Strategy for Managing Knowledge?’ , Harvard Business Review77(March-April): 106-116 .
20.
Hobday, M. (2000) ‘The Project-based Organization: An Ideal Form for Managing Complex Products and Systems?’ , Research Policy29(7-8): 871-893 .
21.
Hodgson, D. E. (2002) ‘Disciplining the Professional: The Case of Project Management’ , Journal of Management Studies39(6): 803-821 .
22.
Katzenbach, J. R. and Smith, D. K. (1993) The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-performance Organization. London: McGraw-Hill .
23.
Kogut, B. and Zander, U. (1992) ‘Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology’ , Organization Science3(3): 383-397 .
24.
Kreiner, K. (2002) ‘Tacit Knowledge Management: The Role of Artefacts’ , Journal of Knowledge Management6(2): 112-123 .
25.
Latour, B. (1996) Aramis or the Love of Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
26.
Lindkvist, L. (2004) ‘Governing Project-based Firms: Promoting Market-like Processes in Hierarchies’ , Journal of Management and Governance8(1): 3-25 .
27.
Lindkvist, L. (2005) ‘Knowledge Communities and Knowledge Collectivities. A Typology of Knowledge Work in Groups’ , Journal of Management Studies42(6): 1189-1210 .
28.
Lindkvist, L. and Söderlund, J. (2002) ‘What Goes on in Projects?—On Goal-directed Learning Processes’, in K. Sahlin-Andersson and A. Söderholm (eds) Beyond Project Management. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press .
29.
Lindkvist, L. , Söderlund, J. and Tell, F. (1998) ‘Managing Product Development Projects: On the Significance of Fountains and Deadlines’ , Organization Studies19(6): 931-951 .
30.
Lock, D. (1996) The Essentials of Project Management. Aldershot: Gower .
31.
Lundin, R. and Söderholm, A. (1995) ‘A Theory of the Temporary Organization’ , Scandinavian Journal of Management11(4): 437-455 .
32.
Nelson, R. R. and Winter, S. G. (1982) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press .
33.
Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge-creating Company—How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
34.
Pavitt, K. (1999) ‘The Nature of Technology’, in Technology, Management, and Systems of Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar .
35.
Project Management Institute (1996) A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. Upper Darby: Project Management Institute .
36.
Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension. Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith .
37.
Prencipe, A. and Tell, F. (2001) ‘Inter-project Learning: Processes and Outcomes of Knowledge Codification in Project-based Firms’ , Research Policy30(9): 1373-1394 .
38.
Reber, A. S. (1993) Implicit Learning: An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
39.
Sahlin-Andersson, K. (1996) ‘I styrbarhetens utmarker’, in I. Sahlin (ed.) Projektets Paradoxer, pp. 118-143. Lund: Studentlitteratur .
40.
Scarbrough, H. , Bresnen, M. , Edelman, L. F. , Laurent, S. , Newell, S. and Swan, J. (2004) ‘The Processes of Project-based Learning: An Exploratory Study’ , Management Learning35(4): 491-506 .
41.
Schön, D. A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Maurice Temple Smith .
42.
Shirouzu, H. , Miyake, N. and Masakawa, H. (2002) ‘Cognitively Active Externalization for Situated Reflection’ , Cognitive Science26: 469-501 .
43.
Silverman, D. (1993) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage .
44.
Sparrow, J. (1998) Knowledge in Organizations: Access to Thinking at Work. London: Sage .
45.
Spender, J.-C. (1996) ‘Making Knowledge the Basis of a Dynamic Theory of the Firm’ , Strategic Management Journal17(Winter Special Issue): 45-62 .
46.
Star, S. L. (1993) ‘Cooperation Without Consensus in Scientific Problem Solving: Dynamics of Closure in Open Systems’, in S. Easterbrook (ed.) CSCW: Cooperation or Conflict. London: Springer Verlag .
47.
Teece, D. J. and Pisano, G. (1994) ‘The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction’ , Industrial and Corporate Change3(3): 537-556 .
48.
Wegner, D. M. , Erber, R. and Raymond, P. (1991) ‘Transactive Memory in Close Relationships’ , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology61(6): 923-929 .
49.
Weick, K. E. (1995) Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage .
50.
Weick, K. E. and Roberts, K. H. (1993) ‘Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks’ , Administrative Science Quarterly38(3): 357-381 .
51.
Zollo, M. and Winter, S. G. (2002) ‘Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities’ , Organization Science13(3): 339-351 .
