Learning Outcomes of Microworlds for Management Education

Abstract

Computer-based simulations are important tools to support learning. In this respect, so-called microworlds may build substantial synergy between learning to think in systems frameworks and learning to deal with the complexity of actual settings. The implications of adopting microworlds are explored in terms of student learning, educational approach and course design. These implications are illustrated with data from a course in a pre-experience undergraduate programme and in a post-experience MBA programme. These data suggest that learning processes can be deepened and accelerated by creating effective combinations of readings, discussions, presentations and microworlds.

Keywords

computer simulation management education MBA programmes microworld systems thinking

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alavi, M. , Yoo, Y. and Vogel, D. R. (1997) `Using Information Technology to Add Value to Management Education', Academy of Management Journal 40: 1310-1333.

Howie, E. , Sy, S. , Ford, L. and Vicente, L. J. (2000) `Human-Computer Interface Design Can Reduce Misperceptions of Feedback', System Dynamics Review 16: 151-171.

Kember, D. and Harper, G. (1987) `Implications for Instruction Arising from the Relationship between Approaches to Studying and Academic Outcomes', Instructional Science 16: 35-46.

Leidner, D. E. and Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1993) `The Information Age Confronts Education: Case Studies on Electronic Classrooms', Information Systems Research 4: 24-54.

Maani, K E. and Cavana, R. Y. (2000) Systems Thinking and Modelling: Understanding Change and Complexity. Auckland: Prentice Hall.

Maier, F. H. and Grossler, A. (2000) `What Are We Talking About?-A Taxonomy of Computer Simulations to Support Learning', System Dynamics Review 16: 135-148.

Marsick, V. J. and O'Neil, J. (1999) `The Many Faces of Action Learning', Management Learning 30: 159-176.

Martin, E. (1999) Changing Academic Work. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Martin, E. and Balla, M. (1991) `Conceptions of Teaching and Implications for Learning', Research and Development in Higher Education 13: 298-304.

10.

Millman, I. J. (2000) `Flight Simulators for Business', paper presented at the 7th Annual EDINEB Conference `Educational Innovation in Economics and Business', Newport Beach, USA.

11.

Papert, S. (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.

12.

Reynolds, M. (1997) `Learning Styles: A Critique', Management Learning 28: 115-133.

13.

Richardson, J. T. E. (2000) Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based and Distance Education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

14.

Sadler-Smith, E. (2001) `A Reply to Reynolds's Critique of Learning Style', Management Learning 32: 291-304.

15.

Salmon, G. (2000) `Computer Mediated Conferencing for Management Learning at the Open University', Management Learning 31: 491-502.

16.

Senge, P. M. (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

17.

Senge, P. M. , Kleiner, A. , Roberts, C. , Ross, R. B. and Smith, B. J. (1996) The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook. London: Nicholas Brealey.

18.

Sterman, J. D. (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

19.

Vermunt, J. D. (1998) `The Regulation of Constructive Learning Processes', British Journal of Educational Psychology 68: 149-171.

20.

Warren, K (1999) `The Dynamics of Strategy', Business Strategy Review 10(3): 1-16.

21.

Watson, W. E. , Johnson, L. and Merrit, D. (1998) `Team Orientation, Self Orientation, and Diversity in Task Groups: Their Connection to Team Performance over Time', Group & Organization Management 23: 161-188.