This article is a longitudinal analysis of the relation between gendered labour divisions and new data processing technologies at the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS). Following social-constructivist and evolutionary economic approaches, the authors hold that the relation between technology and work organization is a two-way process. This means that technology does not only affect the relations between men and women at work, but that these relations also influence technological choices. The proportional numbers of men and women on the labour market and changing conceptions of which work is deemed appropriate for women have been important factors in the strongly varying extent to which women participated in office work. They have also been important factors in determining the course of technological development. Shortages of women on the labour market have even determined search heuristics for new technological solutions in specific directions.
Akrich, M. (1995) ‘User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology’, pp. 167–184 in A. Rip, T.J. Misa and J. Schot (eds) Managing Technology in Society: The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. London and New York: Pinter.
2.
Austrian, G.D. (1982) Herman Hollerith: Forgotten Giant of Information Processing. New York: Columbia University Press.
3.
Beechey, V. (1982), ‘The Sexual Division of Labour and the Labour Process: A Critical Assessment of Braverman’, pp. 54–73 in S. Wood (ed.) The Degradation of Work? Skill, Deskilling and the Labour Process. London: Hutchinson.
4.
Bijker, W.E., T.P. Hughes and T. Pinch, eds (1987) The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5.
Bradley, H. (1989) Men's Work, Women's Work. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6.
Campbell-Kelly, M. (1989) ICL: A Business and Technical History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7.
Campbell-Kelly, M. (1990) ‘Punched-Card Machinery’, pp. 122–155 in W. Aspray (ed.) Computing Before Computers. Ames: Iowa State University Press.
8.
CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) (1950) Annual Report. Voorburg: CBS.
9.
Cockburn, C. (1983), Brothers: Male Dominance and Technological Change. London: Pluto Press.
10.
Cockburn, C. (1985) Machinery of Dominance. London: Pluto Press.
11.
Cockburn, C. and S. Ormrod (1993) Gender and Technology in the Making. London: Sage.
12.
Connell, R. (1987), Gender and Power: Society, the Person and Sexual Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13.
David, P.A. (1985) ‘Clio and the Economics of Qwerty’, American Economic Review75: 332–337.
14.
Davies, M.W. (1982) Woman's Place is at the Typewriter: Office Work and Office Workers 1870–1930. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
15.
De Groot, G. and M. Schrover, eds (1995) Women Workers and Technological Change, London and Bristol: Taylor & Francis.
16.
De Haan, F. (1998) Gender and the Politics of Office Work, The Netherlands 1860–1940, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
17.
De Wit, D. (1994) The Shaping of Automation. Hilversum: Verloren.
18.
Dosi, G., C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg and L. Soete, eds (1988) Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter.
19.
Edge, D. (1995) ‘The Social Shaping of Technology’, pp. 14–32 in N. Heap, R. Thomas, G. Einon, R. Mason and H. Mackay (eds) Information Technology and Society. London: Sage.
20.
Hoffmann, U. (1996) ‘Schrijvers, teksten en schrijfhandelingen. Geconstrueerde werkelijkheden in tekstverwerkingsprogrammatuur’, Kennis en Methode20(1): 9–37.
21.
Houweling, P.J. (1966) ‘De automatisering bij het Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek’, pp. 130–148 in H. Reinoud et al. (eds) Automatisering en Overheid. Utrecht: Het Spectrum.
22.
Oudshoorn, N.E.J. (1996) ‘Genderscripts in Technologie. Noodlot of uitdaging’, Inaugurale rede, University of Twente, Enschede.
23.
Plantenga, J. (1992) ‘De kantelende tijd. Opvattingen over vrouwenarbeid in de jaren vijftig’, Tijdschrift voor vrouwenstudies13(2): 140–161.
24.
Rommes, E., E. van Oost and N. Oudshoorn (1999) ‘Gender and the Design of a Digital City’, Information Technology, Communication and Society2(4): 476–495.
25.
Srole, C. (1987) ‘ “A Blessing to Mankind, and Especially to Womenkind”: The Typewriter and the Feminization of Clerical Work, Boston, 1890–1920’, pp. 84–100 in B. Drygulski Wright (ed.) Women, Work and Technology: Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
26.
van den Ende, Jan (1991) Knopen, kaarten en chips. Voorburg and Heerlen: CBS.
27.
van den Ende, Jan (1994) ‘The Number Factory: Punched-Card Machines at the Dutch Central Bureau of Statistics’, IEEE Annals of the History of Computing16(3): 15–24.
28.
van Oost, E.C.J. (1994) Nieuwe functies, nieuwe verschillen. Genderprocessen in de constructie van de nieuwe automatiseringsfuncties. Delft: Eburon.
29.
van Oost, E.C.J. (2000) ‘Making the Computer Masculine: The Historical Roots of Gendered Representations’, pp. 9–16 in E. Balka and R. Smith (eds) Women, Work and Computerization: Charting a Course to the Future. Boston, MA, Dordrecht and London: Kluwer.
30.
Wajcman, J. (1991) Feminism Confronts Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
31.
Webster, J. (1990) Office Automation: The Labour Process and Women's Work in Britain, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
32.
Webster, J. (1996) Shaping Women's Work: Gender, Employment and Information Technology. London and New York: Longman.
33.
Zimbalist, A., ed. (1979) Case Studies on the Labor Process. London and New York: Monthly Review Press.
34.
Zimmeck, M. (1995) ‘ “The Mysteries of the Typewriter”: Technology and Gender in the British Civil Service, 1870–1914’, pp. 67–69 in G. de Groot and M. Schrover (eds) Women Workers and Technological Change. London and Bristol: Taylor & Francis.
