This paper examines how sociology can think cinematically through the creation of sociological film, achieved by blending sociological and filmic imaginations. While traditional visual sociology often treats film as a tool for data collection, this study argues that cinema functions as a medium of thought that constructs and communicates social knowledge through image, rhythm and affect. Drawing on Just Black? (1992), Talking Heads (1980), Anything Can Happen (1995) and Chronicle of a Summer (1961), the paper demonstrates how cinematic form can embody key dimensions of sociological imagination, such as lived experience, structure–actor relations and reflexivity. By analysing how interviews and framing translate sociological inquiry into visual language, it highlights film's potential to generate affective, collaborative and public modes of understanding. The study concludes that sociological film transforms the camera from an instrument of observation into a participant in thought, making the sociological imagination visible and experiential.
BaptisteAK (2016) Can a research film be considered a stand-alone academic publication? An assessment of the film Climate Change, Voices of the Vulnerable: the Fishers’ Plight. Area48(4): 463–471.
2.
BergerRJQuinneyR (2005) Storytelling Sociology: Narrative As Social Inquiry. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
3.
BorishDCunsoloAMauroI, et al. (2021) Moving images, moving methods: advancing documentary film for qualitative research, International Journal of Qualitative Methods20: 1–14.
4.
CavellS (1979) The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film. Enlarged ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
CollingwoodRG (1958) The Principles of Art. New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
CrawfordPI (1992) Film as discourse: The invention of anthropological realities. In: PICTurtonD (eds) Film as Ethnography. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 66–82.
7.
DeamerD (2022) Section II second Introduction: A series of images and signs. In: Deleuze’s Cinema Books.Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 82–86.
8.
de HeuschL (1962) The Cinema And Social Science: A Survey Of Ethnographic And Sociological Films. Paris: UNESCO.
9.
DeleuzeG (1986) Cinema 1: The Movement-Image.Translated by H Tomlinson and B Habberjam.London: Athlone Press.
10.
DeleuzeG (1989) Cinema 2: The Time-Image.Translated by H Tomlinson and R Galeta.London: Athlone Press.
11.
DenzinN (2011) The cinematic society and the reflexive interview. In: Performance Ethnography. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc, 57–76. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985390.n3.
12.
FordJ (2014) Fugitivity and the filmic imagination. Black Camera : The Newsletter of the Black Film Center/Archives5(2): 4.
13.
GilfillanP (2025) Sociology as science of liberation: a case study of manual laborers. International Review of Sociology35(2): 240–265.
14.
GriersonJ (1933) The documentary producer. Cinema Quarterly2(1): 7–9.
15.
GriffinT (2018) Constructionism: The making of meaning in tourism and hospitality research. In: Handbook of Research Methods for Tourism and Hospitality Management. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785366284.00008
16.
HaltofM (2015) Photographing people’s feelings: the patient eye of Kieślowski and Karabasz. Short Film Studies5(1): 27–30.
17.
HarperD (1988) Visual sociology: expanding sociological vision. The American Sociologist19(1): 54–70.
HarrisA (2020) Ethnocinema. In: The Routledge International Handbook of Ethnographic Film and Video. London: Routledge, 183–192.
20.
HassardJBurnsDHydeP, et al. (2018) A visual turn for organizational ethnography: embodying the subject in video-based research. Organization Studies39(10): 1403–1424.
21.
HennyLM (2012) Trend report: Theory and practice of visual sociology. In: HughesJ (ed.) SAGE Visual Methods.London: Sage Publications, 39–46.
22.
Hickey-MoodyAPageT (2015) Arts, Pedagogy And Cultural Resistance: New Materialisms. London: Rowman & Littlefield International.
23.
JonesK (2017) Performative Social Science. In: MatthesJDavisCSPotterRF (eds) The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Hoboken: NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118901731.iecrm0183.
24.
JonesK (2021) Doing Performative Social Science: Creativity in Doing Research and Reaching Communities.London and New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003187745
25.
KaczmarekJ (2020) Visual sociological research using film and video, on the example of urban studies. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Sociologica73: 5–19.
26.
KieślowskiK (dir) (1980) Talking Heads [Film].
27.
KnoblauchHSchnettlerBTumaR (2013) Video analysis and videography. In: FlickU (ed) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage, 435–449. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446282243.n30.
28.
LeavyP (2018) Handbook of Arts-Based Research. New York: The Guilford Press.
29.
LeavyP (2020) Method Meets Art: Arts-Based Research Practice. 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
30.
LepplaD (2021) Film and the politics of negative community: Krzysztof Kieślowski’s dialectic in the late 1970s Polish People’s Republic. Widok. Teorie i Praktyki Kultury Wizualnej30: 1–53.
31.
LopateP (2024) My Affair with Art House Cinema: Essays and Reviews. New York and Chichester, West Sussex: Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/lopa21640
32.
ŁozińskiM (dir) (1995) Anything Can Happen [Film].
MacDougallD (1969) Prospects of the ethnographic film. Film Quarterly23(2): 16–30.
35.
MacDougallD (2005) The Corporeal Image: Film, Ethnography, and the Senses. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400831562
36.
MacDougallD (2019) The Looking Machine: Essays on Cinema, Anthropology and Documentary Filmmaking. Manchester: Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526134103
37.
MarguliesI (2004) Chronicle of a summer (1960) as autocritique (1959): a transition in the French left. Quarterly Review of Film and Video21(3): 173–185.
38.
McGregorR (2012) The problem of cinematic imagination. Contemporary Aesthetics10.
39.
McPhailCWohlsteinR (1982) Using film to analyze pedestrian behavior. Sociological Methods & Research10(3): 347–375.
40.
MeadMBatesonG (1977) Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson on the use of the camera in anthropology. Studies in the Anthropology of Visual Communication4(2): 78–80.
41.
MikosL (2013) Analysis of film. In: FlickU (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: Sage, 409–423.
42.
Miko-SchefzigKLearmonthMMcMurrayR (2022) A different way of looking at things: the role of social science film in organisation studies. Organization29(4): 653–672.
43.
MillsCW (1959) The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
MoghimiHA (2023) Sociological film: a medium to promote sociological imagination. The American Sociologist54(3): 466–484.
48.
NicholsB (2010) Introduction to Documentary. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
49.
PauwelsL (2015) Social scientific filmmaking and multimedia production: Key features and debates. In: In: Reframing Visual Social Science: Towards a More Visual Sociology and Anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 167–190.
50.
RouchJ (2003) Ciné-Ethnography. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Vol. 13.
51.
RouchJMorinE (dirs) (1961) Chronicle of a Summer [Film].
52.
SandercockLAttiliG (2012) Unsettling A settler society: Film, phronesis and collaborative planning in small-town Canada. In: FlyvbjergBLandmanTSchramS (eds) Real Social Science: Applied Phronesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511719912.010
SimmelG (1964) The Sociology of Georg Simmel. Wolff KH (ed).New York: Macmillan.
55.
SinnerbrinkR (2011) New Philosophies Of Film: Thinking Images. London: Continuum International Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472545770
56.
SooryamoorthyR (2007) Behind the scenes: making research films in sociology. International Sociology22(5): 547–563.
57.
SutherlandJ-AFelteyK (2013) Cinematic sociology: Social life in film. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
58.
TroyerLRobinsonDT (2006) Contributions of A sociological perspective on affect to the study of political action. In: RedlawskD (ed) Feeling Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403983114_4.
Van LanckerL (2025) Cinematic Ethnography: Experiencing Cultures through Some Audio-Visual Practices. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
61.
van LeeuwenT (2021) The semiotics of movement and mobility. Multimodality & Society1(1): 97–118.
62.
VanniniP (2018) Doing Public Ethnography: How to Create and Disseminate Ethnographic and Qualitative Research to Wide Audiences.Boca Raton, FL: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor and Francis. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315111001
63.
VardoulakisD (2006) Total imagination and ontology in R. G. Collingwood. British Journal for the History of Philosophy14(2): 303–322.
64.
WadeD (2011) Cinema, the (digital) machine of the imaginary: revisiting edgar morin in the quest to create a theory of cinema in the digital age. Recherches Sémiotiques / Semiotic Inquiry31(1–2–3): 203–221.
65.
WoodMBrownS (2011) Lines of flight: everyday resistance along England’s backbone. Organization18(4): 517–539.
66.
WoodMSalovaaraPMartiL (2018) Manifesto for filmmaking as organisational research. Organization25(6): 825–835.
