Journalism studies would benefit from a more robust understanding of symbolic representation as a constitutive political act. While the field largely rejects the possibility of an objective and accurate representation of ‘the people’, it is yet to significantly engage with the constitutive role of representation in the formation of collective identities central to all politics. The result is that in both journalism and journalism scholarship, popular political movements are largely understood for how they contravene hegemonic understandings of rational individualism and reasoned debate, rather than as an alignment of political demands.
AhvaLSteensenS (2019) Theory in journalism studies. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds)Handbook of Journalism Studies, 2nd ed.New York: Routledge, pp.38–54.
BennettWL (1996) An introduction to journalism norms and representations of politics. Political Communication13(4): 373–384.
4.
BreeseEB (2015) The perpetual crisis of journalism: cable and digital revolutions. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences8: 49–59.
5.
BunceM (2019) The Broken Estate: Journalism and Democracy in a Post-Truth World. Wellington, NZ: Bridget Williams Books.
6.
ChristiansGCGlasserTLMcQuailD, et al. (2009) Normative Theories of the Media: Journalism in Democratic Societies. Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
7.
ColpaniG (2022) Two theories of hegemony: Stuart Hall and Ernesto Laclau in conversation. Political Theory50(2): 221–246.
8.
DischL (2012) The impurity of representation and the vitality of democracy. Cultural Studies26(2-3): 207–222.
9.
DischL (2021) Making Constituencies: Representation as Mobilization in Mass Democracy. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
10.
EnrothH (2023) Crisis of authority: the truth of post-truth. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society36: 179–195.
11.
FlewTIosifidisP (2020) Populism, globalisation and social media. International Communication Gazette82(1): 7–25.
12.
GansH (1979) Deciding What's News: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Pantheon Books.
GlynosJHowarthD (2007) Logics of Critical Explanation in Social and Political Theory. Oxon: Routledge.
15.
GodlerYReichZMillerB (2020) Social epistemology as a new paradigm for journalism and media studies. New Media and Society22(2): 213–229.
16.
HabermasJ (2022) Reflections and hypotheses on a further structural transformation of the political public sphere. Theory, Culture and Society39(4): 145–171.
17.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18.
HamiltonLVieiraMBDischL, et al. (2024) The power of political representation. Contemporary Political Theory23: 456–484.
19.
HanitzschTVosT (2018) Journalism beyond democracy: a new look into journalistic roles in political and everyday life. Journalism19(2): 146–164.
20.
HartleyJ (2008) Journalism and popular culture. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds) The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.310–324.
21.
JonesJP (2013) Toward a new vocabulary for political communication research: a response to Michael X. Delli Carpini. International Journal of Communication7: 510–530.
22.
KarppinenK (2013) Uses of democratic theory in media and communication studies. SSRN Electronic Journal7(3): 1–17.
23.
LaclauE (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London & New York: Verso.
24.
LaclauE (1996) Emancipation(s). London & New York: Verso.
25.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London & New York: Verso.
26.
LaclauEMouffeC (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
27.
LewisJ and Wahl-Jorgensen (2005) Active citizen or couch potato? Journalism and public opinion. In Allan S (ed) Journalism: Critical Issues. Berkshire: Open University Press, pp.98–108.
28.
LippmannW (1920) Liberty and the News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
29.
LippmannW (1922) Public Opinion. New Brunswick (USA) & London (UK): Transaction Publishers.
30.
MaeseelePRaeijmaekersD (2017) Nothing on the news but the establishment blues? Toward a framework of depoliticization and agonistic media pluralism. Journalism21(11): 1593–1610.
31.
MarchartO (2012) Elements of protest: politics and culture in Laclau’s theory of populist reason. Cultural Studies26(2-3): 223–241.
32.
McNairB (2009) Journalism and democracy. In: Wahl-Jorgensen K and Hanitzsch T (eds)The Handbook of Journalism Studies. New York: Routledge, pp.237–249.
33.
MouffeC (1993) The Return of the Political. London & New York: Verso.
34.
MouffeC (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London & New York: Verso.
35.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political. London & New York: Routledge.
36.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London & New York: Verso.
37.
MouffeC (2022) Towards a Green Democratic Revolution: Left Populism and the Power of Affects. New York: Verso.
38.
MullerD (2021) Journalism and the Future of Democracy. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan Cham.
39.
MüllerJW (2017) What Is Populism?UK: Penguin.
40.
NeroneJ (2013) The historical roots of the normative model of journalism. Journalism14(4): 446–458.
41.
NielsenRK (2017) The one thing journalism just might do for democracy. Journalism Studies18(10): 1251–1262.
ÖrnebringHKarlssonM (2022) Journalistic Autonomy: The Genealogy of a Concept. Missouri: University of Missouri Press.
44.
PeckR (2019) Fox Populism: Branding Conservatism as Working Class. UK: Cambridge University Press.
45.
PetersJD (1993) Distrust of representation: habermas on the public sphere. Media, Culture and Society15(4): 541–571.
46.
PhelanS (2011) The media as the neoliberalized sediment: articulating Laclau’s discourse theory with Bourdieu’s field theory. In: Dahlberg L and Phelan S (eds) Discourse Theory and Critical Media Politics. UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.128–153.
47.
PhelanS (2014) Neoliberalism, Media and the Political. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
48.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkely: University of California Press.
49.
RaeijmaekersDMaeseeleP (2015) Media, pluralism and democracy: what’s in a name?Media, Culture and Society37(7): 1042–1059.
50.
RaeijmaekersDMaeseeleP (2017) In objectivity we trust? Pluralism, consensus, and ideology in journalism studies. Journalism18(6): 647–663.
51.
SchudsonM (2008) Why Democracies Need and Unlovable Press. Cambridge: Polity Press.
52.
SchudsonM (2018) Why Journalism Still Matters. Cambridge: Polity Press.
53.
SiebertFSPetersonTSchrammW (1956) Four Theories of the Press. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
54.
StarkeyG (2007) Balance and Bias in Journalism: Representation, Regulation and Democracy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
55.
StavrakakisY (2018) Paradoxes of polarization: democracy’s inherent division and the (anti-) populist challenge. American Behavioral Scientist62(1): 43–58.
56.
StavrakakisYKatsambekisGAlexandrosK, et al. (2018) Populism, anti-populism and crisis. Contemporary Political Theory17: 4–27.
57.
SutherlandM (2012) Populism and spectacle. Cultural Studies26(2-3): 330–345.
58.
ThomassenL (2019) Representing the people: laclau as a theorist of representation. New Political Science41(2): 329–344.
59.
ThomassenL (2022) The “populist” foundation of liberal democracy: Jan-Werner Müller, Chantal Mouffe, and post-foundationalism. Philosophy and Social Criticism48(7): 992–1013.
60.
WaisbordS (2018) Populism as media and communication phenomenon. In: Del La Torre C (ed)Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. London: Routledge, pp.221–234.
61.
YatesAMondonA (2025) “Get off your high horse and vote for us”: the anti-populist construction of the elite and people. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations27(3): 677–695.
62.
ZerilliLMG (2019) Rethinking the politics of post-truth with Hannah Arendt. In: Bedorf T and Herrmann S (eds) Political Phenomenology: Experience, Ontology, Episteme. Routledge.
