This article examines Vietnam and unpacks how its digital media is operating somewhat successfully. It demonstrates how contemporary online content creators adapt and thrive within a platformed, social media ecology that pushes back against non-authentic media through what locals refer to as ‘online experience intermediators’. Using interviews with Vietnamese creative industry experts, online content creators and younger users, this article articulates how Vietnamese digital media is built on similar practices to its Western counterparts, but has a distinctiveness that provides positive spaces for online communication for particular groups of users. Through a pushback media lens, Vietnamese digital media, specifically social media, is broadly progressive, inclusive, at an arms-length from hate speech, misinformation and vitriol content, and provides a burgeoning digital media market for multiple industries. Vietnam demonstrates a pushback against what has been described as influencers, while at the same time hinting at a desire towards online experience intermediators.
AbidinC (2016) “Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?”: influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society2(23): 1–17.
2.
AbidinC (2018) Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
BacciniLImpullittiGMaleskyEJ (2019) Globalization and state capitalism: assessing Vietnam's accession to the WTO. Journal of International Economics119: 75–92.
7.
BishopS (2019) Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media & Society21(11): 2589–2606.
8.
CameronAPhamTHAthertonJ, et al. (2019) Vietnam’s Future Digital Economy – Towards 2030 and 2045: Summary Report. Brisbane: CSIRO.
9.
CurranJParkM-J (2000) Beyond globalization theory. In: CurranJParkM-J (eds) De-Westernizing Media Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 2–15.
10.
DucDTVDatTTLinhDH, et al. (2024) Measuring the digital economy in Vietnam. Telecommunications Policy48(3): 102683.
11.
DuffyB (2015) Amateur, autonomous, and collaborative: myths of aspiring female cultural producers in web 2.0. Critical Studies in Media Communication32(1): 48–64.
12.
FerdinandsB (2022) Exploring the exposure economy model: A study of digital practices and visibility outcomes on Instagram. PhD Monolith, University of Sydney, Sydney.
13.
GrüneAUlrichDC (2012) (De-)westernizing media and journalism studies: Demarcating, transcending and subverting borders. Global Media Journal - German Edition2(2). Retrieved from: https://globalmediajournal.de/index.php/gmj/article/view/110
14.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
15.
HallinDCManciniP (2004) Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (1995) Ethnography Principles in Practice. London: Routledge.
17.
HutchinsonJ (2017) Cultural Intermediation and Audience Participation in Media Organisations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
HutchinsonJ (2019) Microplatformization for digital activism on social media. Information Communication & Society24(1): 35–51.
19.
HutchinsonJ (2021) Digital intermediation: Unseen infrastructures for cultural production. New Media & Society25(12): 3289–3307.
20.
HutchinsonJ (2023) Digital Intermediation: Unseen Infrastrucutres for Cultural Production. New York: Routledge.
21.
LeVTHutchinsonJ (2022) Regulating social media and influencers within Vietnam. Policy & Internet14(3): 1–16.
22.
Ministry of Information and Communications (2017) White Book of Vietnam Information and Communication Technology. Hanoi, Vietnam: Information and Communications Publishing House.
23.
MorrisonSLGomezR (2014) Pushback: Expressions of resistance to the “evertime” of constant online connectivity. First Monday19(8).
Ngoc QuangNThuyDC (2023) Justice and trustworthiness factors affecting customer loyalty with mediating role of satisfaction with complaint handling: zalo OTT Vietnamese customer case. Cogent Business & Management10(2): 2211821.
26.
NguyenD (2023) Seeing with transparency: mapping the privacy-security controversy over digital contact tracing in Vietnam. International Journal of Communication17: 20. Retrieved from https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/20783/4304
27.
NguyenE (2024) How can SMEs in Vietnam use Facebook as a marketing tool to reach generation Z?Open Journal of Business and Management12(01): 158–168.
28.
NguyenHNguyenA (2020a) Covid-19 misinformation and the social (Media) amplification of risk: a Vietnamese perspective. Media and Communication8(2): 444–447.
29.
NguyenLHNguyenHP (2020b) Generation Z in Vietnam: The quest for authenticity. In: GentinaEParryE (eds) The New Generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, Differences, Digitalisation. London: Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 135–148.
30.
OpenNet Initiative (2012) Vietnam. Retrieved from https://opennet.net/research/profiles/vietnam
31.
PowersD (2015) Intermediaries and intermediation. In: BennettAWaksmanS (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Popular Music. London: Sage Publication Ltd, pp. 1–14.
32.
PowersD (2020) Towards a futuristic cultural studies. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 451–457.
33.
PrestiantaA (2021) Mapping the ASEAN YouTube uploaders. Jurnal ASPIKOM6(1): 1–12.
