Although there has been an increasing number of studies investigating media representations of the COVID-19 outbreak around the world, less international attention has been given to Chinese media outlets’ coverage of the COVID-19 outbreak than that of their western counterparts. This study employs corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis to investigate how China is linguistically represented in a state-run English-language news media. The analysis reveals that China is respectively represented as a victim, a fighter, and a cooperative/supportive country with ideological implications for global solidarity and humanitarianism. This study sheds light on the effective use of discursive strategies in promoting international cooperation and building a national image amid a global health crisis. The value of using corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis to examine national image is also highlighted.
AbbasAH (2022) Politicizing the pandemic: a schemata analysis of COVID-19 mews in two selected newspapers. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique35(3): 883–902.
2.
BakerP (2012) Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies9(3): 247–256.
3.
BakerPGabrielatosCKhosravinikM, et al. (2008) A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society19(3): 273–306.
4.
CapanoGHowlettMJarvisDSL, et al. (2020) Mobilizing policy (in)capacity to fight COVID-19: understanding variations in state responses. Policy and Society39(3): 285–308.
5.
ChanTFYuY (2023) Building a global community of health for all: a positive discourse analysis of COVID-19 discourse. Discourse and Communication17(3): 1–16.
6.
CohenJ (2020) China’s vaccine gambit. Science (New York, N.Y.)370(6522): 1263–1267.
7.
DormanD (2020) China’s global COVID-19 assistance is humanitarian and geopolitical. That’s why people are worried. Security Nexus: 1–5.
Editorial (2021a) Anti-China animosity mars next stage of coronavirus origin study: commissioner of Chinese foreign ministry in HKSAR. Xinhua News Agency, 6 August. Available at: http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-08/06/c_1310111824.htm.
21.
Editorial (2021b) China Focus: China takes scientific COVID-19 control and prevention strategies for public health. Xinhua News Agency, 31 October. Available at: http://www.news.cn/english/2021-10/31/c_1310281718.htm.
KrawczykKChelkowskiTLaydonDJ, et al. (2021) Quantifying online news media coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic: text mining study and resource. Journal of Medical Internet Research23(6): 1–16.
35.
KwanYKChowGC (1995) Estimating Economic Effects of the Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution in China. Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Department of Economics.
36.
LamPWY (2018) The discursive construction and realization of the Hong Kong brand: a corpus-informed study. Text & Talk38(2): 191–215.
37.
LeeC-C (2002) Established pluralism: US elite media discourse about China policy. Journalism Studies3(3): 343–357.
LouwB (1993) Irony in the text or insincerity in the writer? The diagnostic potential of semantic prosodies. In: Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, pp. 157–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/z.64.11lou.
40.
ManheimJBAlbrittonRB (1983) Changing national images: international public relations and media agenda setting. American Political Science Review78(3): 641–657.
41.
NaeemSBBhattiR (2020) The COVID-19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal37(3): 233–239.
42.
NarteyM (2019) ‘We must unite now or perish!’ Kwame Nkrumah’s creation of a mythic discourse?Journal of Language and Politics18(2): 252–271.
43.
NimmoDDSavageRL (1976) Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods, and Findings. Los Angeles: Goodyear Publishing Company.
44.
PartingtonA (2004) Corpora and discourse, a most congruous beast. In: APartingtonJMorleyLHaarman (eds) Corpora and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang, pp.11–20.
SantosARGatterR (2020) Smoke screens: an initial analysis of the coronavirus lawsuits in the United States against China and the World Health Organization. SSRN Electronic Journal4: 1–10.
47.
ScholzSJ (2008) Political Solidarity. University Park, PA: Penn State Press.
48.
ScottM (2013) WordSmith tools version 6.0 [Computer software]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
SilverLDevlinKHuangC (2020) Unfavorable views of China reach historic highs in many countries. Pew Research Center6: 1–29.
50.
SiuLChunC (2020) Yellow peril and techno-orientalism in the time of COVID-19: racialized contagion, scientific espionage, and techno-economic warfare. Journal of Asian American Studies23(3): 421–440.
51.
StubbsM (2001) Words and Phrases: Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
52.
VenkateshAEdirappuliS (2020) Social distancing in COVID-19: what are the mental health implications?BMJ: m1379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1379.
53.
WangH (2003) National image building and Chinese foreign policy. China: An International Journal1(01): 46–72.
WiddowsonHG (2000) On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics21(2): 3–25.
56.
WodakR (2015) Critical discourse analysis, discourse-historical approach. In: KTracy (ed) The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, pp.275–288.
YuY (2022a) Legitimising a global fight for a shared future: a critical metaphor analysis of the reportage of COVID-19 in China Daily. In: RBreezeKKondoAMusolff (eds) Pandemic and Crisis Discourse: Communicating COVID-19. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp.241–254.
59.
YuY (2022b) Resisting foreign hostility in China’s English-language news media during the COVID-19 crisis. Asian Studies Review46(2): 254–271.
60.
YuYTayD (2022) Formulating a discourse of solidarity amid COVID-19: a positive discourse analysis of remarks given by China’s foreign ministry spokespersons. In: FRossette-CrakeEBuckwalter (eds) Covid, Culture and Communication. London: Routledge, pp.76–94.
