Typically free, accessible on-demand and easy to use, smartphone-based applications (apps) targeting mental health have expanded in recent years. This article discusses a qualitative research study with 14 young adults aged 18 to 25 years old who use apps to understand, track, and monitor their mental health. I present four vignettes drawn from a screenshot elicitation and a qualitative interview that sought to explore what is significant, socially and materially, for young adults in their usage of apps for their mental health. In this article, I examine how apps transform, interrupt, and mediate young adults’ understandings and experiences of mental (ill) health. The analysis draws on sociomaterialism to demonstrate how, at a time when digital mental health is expanding, mental (ill) health is assembled and disassembled with and through apps, and users’ experiences are enmeshed in affective intensities and entangled with technology.
AlburyKByronPShawF (2019) Introduction: the will to app: digitising public health. Media International Australia171(1): 3–8.
2.
BaradK (2003) Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society28(3): 801–831.
3.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
BeckEJMandaliaSHarlingG, et al. (2011) Protecting HIV information in countries scaling up HIV services: a baseline study. Journal of the International AIDS Society14(6).
6.
BraunVClarkeV (2019) Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health11(4): 589–597.
7.
BrennenBS (2021) Qualitative Research Methods for Media Studies. New York: Routledge.
8.
ByronP (2019) ‘Apps are cool but generally pretty pointless’: LGBTIQ+ young people’s mental health app ambivalence. Media International Australia171(1): 51–65.
CarahN (2020) What do participants on digital media platforms produce? Tracking the development of Hello Sunday Morning from a blog, to a social network, to a self-tracking app. International Journal of Cultural Studies23(4): 512–530.
11.
Clue (2021) Track your period and ovulation with Clue to understand how your body works. Available at:https://helloclue.com/(accessed 6 August 2021).
12.
CohenBMZ (ed) (2018) The Routledge International Handbook of Critical Mental Health. New York: Routledge.
13.
DalyA (2015) The law and ethics of ‘self-quantified’ health information: an Australian perspective. International Data Privacy Law5(2): 144–155.
FloreJ (2021) Ingestible sensors, data, and pharmaceuticals: subjectivity in the era of digital mental health. New Media & Society23(7): 2034–2051.
17.
FullagarSRichEFrancombe-WebbJ (2017a) New kinds of (ab)normal? Public pedagogies, affect, and youth mental health in the digital age. Social Sciences6(3): 99.
18.
FullagarSRichEFrancombe-WebbJ, et al. (2017b) Digital ecologies of youth mental health: apps, therapeutic publics and pedagogy as affective arrangements. Social Sciences6(4): 135.
19.
GoodingP (2019) Mapping the rise of digital mental health technologies: emerging issues for law and society. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry63: 1–11.
20.
HendryN (2020) Young women’s mental illness and (in-)visible social media practices of control and emotional recognition. Social Media + Society6(4): 1–10.
21.
HjorthLBurgessJRichardsonI (eds) (2012) Studying Mobile Media: Cultural Technologies, Mobile Communication and the iPhone. New York: Routledge.
22.
Hohmann-MarriottB (2021) Periods as powerful data: user understandings of menstrual app data and information. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 23 August 2021. DOI: 10.1177/14614448211040245.
23.
HuysQJMMaiaTVFrankMJ (2016) Computational psychiatry as a bridge from neuroscience to clinical applications. Nature Neuroscience19(3): 404–413.
24.
InselTR (2018) Digital phenotyping: a global tool for psychiatry. World Psychiatry17(3): 276–277.
25.
JarzabkowskiPBednarekRLeJK (2014) Producing persuasive findings: demystifying ethnographic textwork in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization12(4): 274–287.
26.
JaynesV (2019) The social life of screenshots: the power of visibility in teen friendship groups. New Media & Society22(8): 1378–1393.
27.
JudeJ (2017) African Indigenous oral traditional endarkened feminist practice: indigenous knowledge and new materialism. Murmurations: Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice1(1): 57–67.
28.
LevinaM (2017) Disrupt or die: mobile health and disruptive innovation as body politics. Television & New Media18(6): 548–564.
29.
LomborgSFrandsenK (2016) Self-tracking as communication. Information, Communication and Society19(7): 1015–1027.
30.
LuptonD (2016) Towards critical digital health studies: reflections on two decades of research in health and the way forward. Health20(1): 49–61.
31.
LuptonD (2019a) The thing-power of the human-app health assemblage: thinking with vital materialism. Social Theory & Health17: 125–139.
32.
LuptonD (2019b) ‘It’s made me a lot more aware’: A new materialist analysis of self-tracking. Media International Australia171(1): 66–79.
33.
LuptonDMaslenS (2019) How women use digital technologies for health: qualitative interview and focus group study. Journal of Medical Internet Research21: e11481.
MazzeiLA (2014) Beyond an easy sense: a diffractive analysis. Qualitative Inquiry20(6): 742–746.
36.
McCoskerA (2017) Networks of Advocacy & Influence: Peer Mentors in Beyondblue’s Mental Health Forums. Melbourne: Swinburne University Social Innovation Research Institute.
37.
MindDoc (2022) MindDoc. Available at:https://minddoc.de/(accessed 12 November 2021).
38.
OurHerd (2021) Share stories, create change. Available at:https://www.ourherd.io/(accessed 15 December 2021).
39.
OwnbyT (2017) Visual images as data within qualitative research. In: MAllen (ed.) The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp.1863–1865.
40.
RoseNAbi-RachedJ (2013) Neuro: The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
41.
SanderLBLemorMLVan der SlootRJA, et al. (2021) A systemic evaluation of mobile health applications for the prevention of suicidal behavior or non-suicidal self-injury. Frontiers in Digital Health3: 689692.
42.
ShawFMcCoskerA (2019) Mental health support apps and ‘proper distance’: Relational ethics in mHealth. Media International Australia171(1): 9–22.
