This paper explores the hashtag #AboriginalLivesMatter on Instagram which was widely used in Australia as part of a global Black Lives Matter (BLM) response in 2020. We map the participants and themes of #AboriginalLivesMatter through the quantitative coding and qualitative thematic analysis of 603 Instagram posts published with this hashtag in June 2020. We find that this conversation is largely driven by celebrities and non-Indigenous participants and framed by themes including expressing the problem as first-person experience, offering solutions, reporting, performing empty statements, and expressing US-centrism. Drawing on critiques of connective action and our analysis of the Instagram platform, we suggest that these findings are indicative of the tensions negotiated between incorporating allies on platforms that prioritise sharing first-person experiences; balancing the communicative capacities of Instagram with its inherently commercialised digital cultures; and, drawing on the spreadability of global digital movements while maintaining cultural specificity for local activists.
BennettLWSegerbergA (2013) The Logic of Connective Action. Cambridgeshire: Cambridge University Press.
2.
BennettW (2012) The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns in participation. The American Academy of Political and Social Science664(1): 20–39.
3.
BennettWLSegerbergA (2012) The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society15(5): 739–768.
4.
BlueE (2016) Seeing Miss Dhu: Time to turn a light on Aboriginal deaths in custody. ABC, 14 March.
5.
BonillaYRosaJ (2015) #Ferguson: Digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. American Ethnologist42(1): 4–17.
6.
Bonilla SilvaE (2003) Racism without Racists: Color Blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in America. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
7.
BursztynskyJWhittenS (2020) Instagram users flood the app with millions of Blackout Tuesday posts. CNBC, 21 June, 30.
8.
CarlsonBFrazerR (2016) Indigenous activism and social media: A global response to #SOSBLAKAUSTRALIA. In: AMcCoskerSVivienneAJohns (eds) Negotiating Digital Citizenship: Control, Contest and Culture. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, pp.115–130.
9.
CarlsonBFrazerR (2018) Yarning circles and social media activism. Media International Australia169(1): 43–53.
10.
CarlsonBFrazerR (2020) ‘They got filters’: Indigenous social media, the settler gaze, and a politics of hope. Social Media+Society6(2): 1–11.
11.
CouldryN (2015) The myth of ‘us’: Digital networks, political change and the production of collectivity. Information, Communication and Society18: 608–626.
12.
DreherTMcCallumKWallerL (2016) Indigenous voices and mediatized policy-making in the digital age. Information, Communication and Society19: 23–39.
13.
Fransen-TaylorPNarayanB (2018) Challenging prevailing narratives with Twitter: An #AustraliaDay case study of participation, representation and elimination of voice in an archive. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science50(3): 310–321.
14.
FreelonDMcllwainCDClarkM (2016) Beyond the hashtag: #Ferguson, #BlackLivesMatter, and the online struggle for offline justice. Center for Media and Social Impact: 1–92.
15.
GastilJRichardsRC (2017) Embracing digital democracy: A call for building an online civic commons. Political Science & Politics50(3): 758–763.
16.
GlaserBGStraussAL (1999) The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Reprint, New York: Routledge, 2017.
17.
Kepios, We are Social and Hootsuite (2020) Digital in 2020. Report, Kepios, We are Social and Hootsuite, US.
18.
JacksonSJBaileyMFoucault WellesB (2020) #Hashtag Activism: Networks of Race and Gender Justice. London: MIT Press.
19.
JosephR (2018) Postracial Resistance: Black Women, Media, and the Uses of Strategic Ambiguity. New York: NYU Press.
20.
KarpfD (2013) Comment on ‘organization in the crowd: Peer production in large-scale networked protests’. Information, Communication and Society17(2): 261–263.
21.
KavadaA (2015) Creating the collective: Social media, the occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication & Society18(8): 872–886.
22.
LeaverTHighfieldTAbidinC (2020) Instagram: Visual Social Media Cultures. Cambridge: Policy Press.
23.
MaddenS (2018) Engaging collaborative communities: Dialogue and campus sexual assault. Journal of Communication Management22(3): 296–308.
24.
MarchettiE (2005) Critical reflections upon Australia’s Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody. Macquarie Law Journal5: 103–125.
25.
Matamoros-FernándezA (2017) Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of an Australian race-based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. Information, Communication & Society20(6): 930–946.
26.
MilanS (2015) When algorithms shape collective action: Social media and the dynamics of cloud protesting. Social Media+Society1(2): 1–10.
27.
OlteanuAWeberIGatica-PerezD (2015) Characterizing the demographics behind the #BlackLivesMatter movement. In: AAAI Spring Symposia on Observational Studies through Social Media and Other Human-Generated Content, Stanford, US, 17 December 2015, pp.1–9.
28.
ParmaleeJHRomanN (2019) Insta-politicos: Motivations for following political leaders on Instagram. Social Media+Society5(2): 1–12.
29.
PetrayTLHalbertK (2013) Teaching engagement: Reflections on sociological praxis. Australian Sociological Association49(4): 441–455.
30.
PetrayTLRowanC (2017) Your privilege is trending: Confronting whiteness on social media. Social Media+Society3(2): 1–10.
31.
PhillipsH (2020) Performative allyship is deadly (here’s what to do instead). Medium, 10 May.
32.
PoellTAbdullaRRiederB, et al. (2016) Protest leadership in the age of social media. Information, Communication, and Society19(7): 994–1014.
33.
PostillJ (2015) Book review: The logic of connectivec action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics20(4): 498–507.
34.
RiceESHaynesERoyceP, et al. (2016) Social media and digital technology use among Indigenous young people in Australia: A literature review. International Journal for Equity in Health15(1): 81.
35.
ShahinSNakaharaJSanchezM (2021) Black Lives Matter goes global: Connective action meets cultural hybridity in Brazil, India, and Japan. New Media & Society: 1–20.
36.
SinananJ (2020) Blackout tuesday: The black square is a symbol of online activism for non-activists.
37.
SMPerth (2021) Facts & figures: Instagram statistics for 2022. Social Media Perth, 1 September.
38.
TrottV (2017) Connected feminists: Foregrounding the interpersonal in connective action. Australian Journal of Political Science53(1): 116–129.
39.
WrightS (2015) Populism and downing street E-petitions: Connective action, hybridity, and the changing nature of organizing. Political Communication32(3): 414–433.
40.
WuriDMTambunanSMG (2018) Representing nation/homeland, gender, and religion. In: MBudiantaMBudimanAKusnoMMoriyama (eds) Positive Body Image Activism in Collective (@effyourbeautystandards) and Personal (@yourstruelymelly) Instagram Accounts: Challenging American Idealized Beauty Construction. Depok: Taylor & Francis Group, pp.297–302.
41.
YangG (2016) Narrative agency in hashtag activism: The case of #BlackLivesMatter. Media and Communication4(4): 13–17.
