Social media are prominent channels to foster the social debate about climate change. This research explores the strategies that institutions supporting scientific consensus on climate change undertake in order to communicate through social media. We conducted 21 semi-structured interviews with community managers and communication directors of organizations of different characteristics in several countries. From the responses we have identified strategies that are based on communicators’ perceptions and experience. We identified strategies that: (a) orientate the communication objectives, (b) help to approach citizens in an effective way, and (c) create interaction with the users. This provides a repertoire of well-grounded strategies that can work as a guide that may help organizations to design their actions to communicate climate change through social media. We conclude that including higher levels of interaction in social media strategies remains a challenge that could lead to a more effective social debate on climate change.
AndersonA (2017) Effects of social media use on climate change opinion, knowledge, and behavior. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-369/ (accessed 10 March 2019). DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.369.
2.
ArltDHoppeIWollingJ (2011) Climate change and media usage: Effects on problem awareness and behavioral intentions. International Communication Gazette73(1–2): 45–63.
3.
BallantyneAG (2016) Climate change communication: What can we learn from communication theory?Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change7(3): 329–344.
4.
BarnoskyAMatlockTChristensenJ, et al. (2016) Chapter 9. Establishing common ground: Finding better ways to communicate about climate disruption. Collabra2(1): 1–20.
5.
BerloD (1977) Communication as process review and commentary. In RubenBD (ed.) Communication Yearbook 1. New Brunswick, N.J: Transaction Books, 11–27.
6.
BoykoffMT (2011) Who Speaks for the Climate?: Making Sense of media Reporting of Climate Change.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1080/10584609.2013.776870.
7.
BoykoffMT (2019) Creative (Climate) Communications: Productive Pathways for Science, Policy and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781108164047.
8.
BucchiM (2008) Of deficits deviations and dialogues. Theories of public communication of science. In BucchiMTrenchB (eds.) Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. London: Routledge, 57–76. DOI: 10.4324/9781003039242.
9.
CareyJ (1989) Communication as Culture: Essays on media and Society. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
10.
CodyEMReaganAJMitchellL, et al. (2015). Climate change sentiment on twitter: An unsolicited public opinion poll. PloS One10(8): e0136092.
DaftRLLengelRH (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science32(5): 554–571.
13.
DalrympleKEYoungRTullyM (2016) “Facts, not fear”: Negotiating uncertainty on social media during the 2014 ebola crisis. Science Communication38(4): 442–467.
14.
DownesEJMcMillanSJ (2000). Defining interactivity: A qualitative identification of key dimensions. New Media and Society2(2): 157–179.
15.
EdsonCTandocECJrEngN (2017) Climate change communication on Facebook, Twitter, Sina Weibo and other social media platforms. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/climatescience/climatescience/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228620-e-361 (accessed 15 March 2019). DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.361.
16.
GeigerNSwimJKFraserJ (2017) Creating a climate for change: Interventions, efficacy and public discussion about climate change. Journal of Environmental Psychology51: 104–116.
17.
GruzdARoyJ (2014) Investigating political polarization on twitter: A Canadian perspective. Policy and internet6(1): 28–45.
18.
HabermasJ (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
19.
HortaACarvalhoASchmidtL (2017) The hegemony of global politics: News coverage of climate change in a small country. Society and Natural Resources30(10): 1246–1260.
20.
Jensen JF (1998) ‘Interactivity’: Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review19(1): 185–204.
21.
KahanDMPetersEWittlinM, et al. (2012) The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks. Nature Climate Change2(10): 732–735. DOI: 10.1038/nclimate1547.
22.
KaplanAMHaenleinM (2010) Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons53(1): 59–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
23.
KelleherT (2009) Conversational voice, communicated commitment, and public relations outcomes in interactive online communication. Journal of Communication (59):172–188. DOI:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01410.x.
24.
KentMTaylorM (1998) Building dialogic relationships through the world wide web, Public Relations Review24(3): 321–334. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80143-X.
25.
KiousisS (2002) Interactivity: A concept explication. New Media and Society4(3): 355–383. DOI: 10.1177/146144402320564392.
26.
MarkowitzEMGuckianML (2018) Climate change communication: Challenges, insights, and opportunities. In: ClaytonSManningC (eds) Psychology and Climate Change: Human Perceptions, Impacts, and Responses. London: Academic Press, 35–63. DOI: 10.23923/pap.psicol2019.2902.
27.
MavrodievaAVRachmanOKHarahapVB, et al. (2019) Role of social media as a soft power tool in raising public awareness and engagement in addressing climate change. Climate7(10): 122. DOI: 10.3390/cli7100122.
28.
MintzbergH (1987) The strategy concept I: Five Ps For strategy. California Management Review30(1): 11. DOI: 10.2307/41165263.
29.
OlteanuACastilloCDiakopoulosN, et al. (2015) Comparing events coverage in online news and social media: The case of climate change. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media9(1): 288–297. Available at: https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/14626.
30.
PainterJKristiansenSSchäferMS (2018) How ‘digital-born’ media cover climate change in comparison to legacy media: A case study of the COP 21 summit in Paris. Global Environmental Change48: 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.003.
31.
PearceWNiedererSÖzkulaSM, et al. (2019) The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change10(2): e569. DOI: 10.1002/wcc.569.
32.
QiaoF (2019) Conceptualizing interactivity on social media and exploring the effects of interactivity on consumers’ engagement with online social-interactions. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies9(3): 1–13. DOI: 10.29333/ojcmt/5781.
33.
RogersE (1994) A History of Communication Study: A Biographical Approach. New York: The Free Press.
34.
SapienzaZSVeenstraASKirtkiklissK, et al. (2016) The transmission model of communication: Toward a multidisciplinary explication, ETC: A Review of General Semantics73 (4): 321–341.
35.
SegerbergA (2017) Online and social media campaigns for climate change engagement. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science.
36.
SegerbergABennettWL (2011) Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. Communication Review14(3): 197–215.
37.
ShannonCWeaverW (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
38.
ShortJWilliamsEChristieB (1976) The Social Psychology of Telecommunications. London; New York: Wiley. DOI: 10.2307/2065899.
39.
ShuklaJ (2017) Challenges and strategies for enhancing climate change communication and environmental engagement. Research Review4(3): 271–278.
40.
SundarSSKalyanaramanSBrownJ (2003) Explicating web site interactivity impression formation effects in political campaign sites. Communication Research30(1): 30–59.
41.
ThompsonJLSchweizerS (2008) The conventions of climate change communication. In Annual Meeting of the NCA 94th Annual Convention,TBA, San Diego. Available at: http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p257(accessed 20 August 2019).
VragaEKAndersonAAKotcherJE, et al. (2015) Issue-specific engagement: How Facebook contributes to opinion leadership and efficacy on energy and climate issues. Journal of Information Technology and Politics12(2): 200–218.
45.
WeberEU (2016) What shapes perceptions of climate change? New research since 2010. WIREs Climate Change7(1):125–134.
46.
WhitingAWilliamsD (2013). Why people use social media: A uses and gratifications approach. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal16(4): 362–369.
47.
WilliamsHTMcMurrayJRKurzT, et al. (2015) Network analysis reveals open forums and echo chambers in social media discussions of climate change. Global Environmental Change32: 126–138.
48.
Zolkepli IAKamarulzamanY (2015) Social media adoption: The role of media needs and innovation characteristics. Computers in Human Behavior43: 189–209.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
