This study uses news photographs and interviews with journalists to explore how Australia’s unprecedented 2019–2020 bushfire season was depicted for Australian and non-Australian audiences in order to extend transnational understanding of iconicity’s tenets and how news values vary across contexts. It does so first by examining the Sydney Morning Herald’s coverage over 3 months and then by contrasting this with international coverage that began in early 2020 once the issue spilled onto the world stage. Australia’s coverage focused intensely on human actors involved in the disaster while the vast numbers of affected animals were virtually absent. In contrast, international media visually depicted the disaster as an environmental and ecological issue with global consequences. The results suggest a need for a definition of iconicity that is inclusive to non-human actors and to inanimate forces that are personified. It also extends our cross-cultural understanding of the visual expression of news values.
BaberiniMColemanCLSlovicP, et al. (2015) Examining the effects of photographic attributes on sympathy, emotions, and donation behavior. Visual Communication Quarterly22(2): 118–128.
4.
Ball-RokeachSJDeFleurML (1976) A dependency model of mass-media effects. Communication Research3(1): 3–21.
BorahP (2009) Comparing visual framing in newspapers: Hurricane Katrina versus tsunami. Newspaper Research Journal30(1): 50–57.
7.
BucyEP (2010) Nonverbal communication, emotion, and political evaluation. In: DovelingKScheveCVKonjinEA (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Emotions and Mass Media. Abingdon: Routledge, p. 195.
8.
BurtCDStrongmanK (2005) Use of images in charity advertising: improving donations and compliance rates. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour8(8): 571–580.
CapleH (2019) Photojournalism Disrupted: The View from Australia. Abingdon: Routledge.
12.
ChangCTLeeYK (2009) Framing charity advertising: influences of message framing, image valence, and temporal framing on a charitable appeal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology39(12): 2910–2935.
13.
DahmenNSMillerA (2012) Redefining iconicity: A five-year study of visual themes of Hurricane Katrina. Visual Communication Quarterly19(1): 4–19.
14.
FahmySKellyJDKimYS (2007) What Katrina revealed: a visual analysis of the hurricane coverage by news wires and US newspapers. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly84(3): 546–561.
15.
GamsonWACroteauDHoynesW, et al. (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology18: 373–393.
GreenwoodKThomasRJ (2015) Locating the journalism in citizen photojournalism: the use and content of citizen-generated imagery. Digital Journalism3(4): 615–633.
18.
HarimanRLucaitesJL (1999) No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
HarimanRLucaitesJL (2007) No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
MessarisP (1998) Visual aspects of media literacy. Journal of Communication48(1): 70–80.
29.
MillerARobertsS (2010) Visual agenda-setting & proximity after Hurricane Katrina: A study of those closest to the event. Visual Communication Quarterly17(1): 31–46.
MortensenTMHullKBolingKS (2017) Really social disaster: an examination of photo sharing on twitter during the# SCFlood. Visual Communication Quarterly24(4): 219–229.
SchillD (2012) The visual image and the political image: a review of visual communication research in the field of political communication. Review of Communication12(2): 118–142.
ThomsonTJGreenwoodK (2017) I ‘Like’ that: exploring the characteristics that promote social media engagement with news photographs. Visual Communication Quarterly24(4): 203–218.
45.
ThomsonTJ (2019) To See and Be Seen: The Environments, Interactions and Identities Behind News Images. London, UK: Rowman & Littlefield International.
