This article looks at mobile media access in the Philippines and the kind of social intimacies that have emerged from it. To frame our discussion, we use the concept of ‘glocal intimacies’. This pertains to how mobile technologies have normalised and intensified the entanglement of people’s relationships of closeness with the ever-shifting and constantly negotiated flows between global modernity and local everyday life. We show that the uneven access that Filipinos have has led to equally uneven ways in which they imagine and enact intimate relationships. Drawing on case studies emblematic of the country’s key income clusters, we point out the emergence of a contradictory situation, wherein those with relatively high-quality access are those who are least dependent on mobile media for their glocal intimacies. Meanwhile, those with relatively low-quality access are those who are actually most dependent on mobile-mediated communication for such intimacies.
AcederaKAFYeohBSA (2019) ‘Making time’: long-distance marriages and the temporalities of the transnational family. Current Sociology67(2): 250–272.
2.
AlampayEA (2006) Beyond access to ICTs: measuring capabilities in the information society. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology2(3): 4–22.
3.
AlbertJRGSantosAGFVizmanosJFV (2018) Profile and determinants of the middle-income class in the Philippines. Discussion Paper Series No. 2018-20. Quezon, Philippines: Philippine Institute of Development Studies (PIDS).
AroraP (2019) The Next Billion Users. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
AroraPScheiberL (2017) Slumdog romance: Facebook love and digital privacy at the margins. Media, Culture & Society39(3): 408–422.
7.
BaldassarLMerlaL (2014) Introduction: transnational family caregiving through the lens of circulation. In: BaldassarLMerlaL (Eds) Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care: Understanding Mobility and Absence in Family Life. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–24.
8.
BlumlerJGMcLeodJMRosengrenKE (1992) An introduction to comparative communication research. In: BlumlerJGMcLeodJMRosengrenKE (eds) Comparatively Speaking: Communication and Culture across Space and Time. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 3–18.
9.
CabalquintoECB (2020) [Dis]connected households: transnational family life in the age of mobile internet. In: HunsingerJAllenMKlastrupL (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 83–103.
10.
CabandaEAriffM (2002) Performance gains through privatization and competition of Asian telecommunications. ASEAN Economic Bulletin19(3): 254–279.
11.
CabañesJVA (2019) Information and communication technologies and migrant intimacies: the case of Punjabi youth in Manila. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(9): 1650–1666.
12.
CabañesJVAAcederaKAF (2012) Of mobile phones and mother-fathers: calls, text messages, and conjugal power relations in mother-away Filipino families. New Media & Society14(6): 916–930.
13.
CabañesJVACollantesCF (2020) Dating apps as digital flyovers: mobile media and global intimacies in a postcolonial city. In: CabañesJVAUy-TiocoCS (eds) Mobile Media and Social Intimacies in Asia, Mobile Communication in Asia: Local Insights, Global Implications. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 97–114.
14.
CabañesJVAUy-TiocoCS (eds) (2020) Mobile Media and Social Intimacies in Asia: Local Insights, Global Implications. Dordrecht: Springer.
15.
CaguioRLomboyO (2014) Understanding how overseas Filipino workers engage on national issues in Pinoy OFW Facebook page. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences155: 417–421
16.
CastellsMFernandez-ArdevolMQuiJL, et al. (2007) Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
DICT (2017) National Broadband Plan: Building Infostructures for a Digital Nation. Quezon, Philippines: Department of Information and Communications and Technology.
18.
DobsonASRobardsBCarahN (eds) (2018) Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. New York: Palgrave.
19.
DonnerJ (2008) Research approaches to mobile use in the developing world: a review of the literature. The Information Society24(3): 140–159.
20.
DonnerJ (2015) After Access: Inclusion, Development, and a More Mobile Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
FifeE (ed.) (2018) The Philippines: Mobilizing an archipelago. Pacific Telecommunications Council Broadband Reports, No. 4. Honolulu, HI:: Pacific Telecommunications Council.
22.
GillespieM (ed.) (2005) Media Audiences. Maidenhead and New York: Open University Press.
23.
Glick-SchillerNBaschLBlanc-SzantonC (eds) (1992) Towards a Transnational Perspective on Migration: Race, Class, Ethnicity, and Nationalism Reconsidered. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
24.
HarveyD (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
25.
HjorthLLimSS (2012) Mobile intimacy in an age of affective mobile media. Feminist Media Studies12(4): 477–484.
26.
IllouzE (2012) Why Love Hurts. Cambridge: Polity.
27.
IntalPSJr (1995) Visions for Philippines 2000: the challenge of economic restructuring towards sustained economic growth. Journal of Philippine Development22(1): 1–42.
28.
LaborJ (2020) Mobile sexuality: presentations of young Filipinos in dating apps. Plaridel: A Philippine Journal of Communication, Media, and Society17(1): 247–278.
29.
LicoppeC (2004) ‘Connected’ presence: the emergence of a new repertoire for managing social relationships in a changing communication technoscape. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space22(1): 135–156.
30.
LimSS (ed.) (2016) Mobile Communication and the Family: Asian Experiences in Technology Domestication. Dordrecht: Springer.
31.
LivingstoneS (2003) On the challenges of cross-national comparative media research. European Journal of Communication18(4): 477–500.
32.
LorenzanaJA (2018) Effervescence, resonance and emotive practice on social media: public expressions of heartbreak among young Filipino Twitter users. In: DobsonA.RobardsB.CarahN. (eds) Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media. Palgrave Studies in Communication for Social Change. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.145–160.
33.
LorenzanaJA (2019) Resilient love: intimacy, social media surveillance and (dis) trust in metro Manila. In: AthiqueABaulchE (eds) Digital Transactions in Asia Digital Transactions in Asia Economic, Informational, and Social Exchanges. New York and London: Routledge, pp.209–223.
34.
McChesneyR (2008) The Political Economy of Media: Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press.
35.
McKayDCC (2016) An Archipelago of Care: Filipino Migrants and Global Networks. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
36.
McKayDCC (2017) Sent home: mapping the absent child into migration through polymedia. Global Networks18(1): 133–150.
37.
MadianouMMillerD (2013) Polymedia: towards a new theory of digital media in interpersonal communication. International Journal of Cultural Studies16(2): 169–187.
MasseyD (1994) Space, Place, and Gender. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
MendesSAlampayESorianoE, et al. (2007) The Innovative Use of Mobile Applications in the Philippines: Lessons for Africa. Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency.
41.
MirandillaMGP (2007) Achieving universal access through liberalization, regulation, and deregulation: the case of the Philippine telecommunications and ICT sector. In: Communication Policy Research (CPR) south2 conference, Chennai, India, 15–17.
42.
NollRG (1999) Telecommunications Reform in Developing Countries. AEI-Bookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=181030 (accessed 10 June 2020).
43.
ParagasF (2006) Eccentric networks: patterns of interpersonal communication, organizational participation, and mass media use among overseas Filipino workers. PhD Dissertation, Ohio University, Athens, OH.
44.
ParagasF (2008) Migrant workers and mobile phones: technological, temporal, and spatial simultaneity. In: LingR (ed.) The Reconstruction of Space and Time: Mobile Communication Practices. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–66.
45.
PertierraR (2003) Science Technology, and Everyday Culture in the Philippines. Quezon, Philippines: Institute of Philippine Culture.
QiuJL (2009) Working Class Network Society: Communication Technology and the Information Have-less in Urban China. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48.
RobertsonR (1994) Globalisation or glocalisation?Journal of International Communication1(1): 33–52.
49.
San PascualRS (2019) Harnessing the potential of communication for the well-being of transnational families. In: DuttaMZapataD (eds) Communicating for Social Change. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 155–172.
50.
SorianoCR (2019) Communicative assemblages of the Pisonet and the Translocal context of ICT for the ‘have-less’: innovation, inclusion, stratification. International Journal of Communication13: 4682–4701.
51.
SorianoCRRLimSSRivera-SanchezM (2015) The Virgin Mary with a mobile phone: ideologies of mothering and technology consumption in Philippine television advertisements. Communication, Culture, and Critique8(1): 1–19.
52.
Uy-TiocoCS (2007) Overseas Filipino workers and text messaging: reinventing transnational mothering. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies21(2): 253–265.
53.
Uy-TiocoCS (2017) Transnational ties: Elite Filipino migrants and polymedia environments. In: LopezLKPhamVN (eds) The Routledge Companion to Asian American Media. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 249–260.
54.
Uy-TiocoCS (2019) ‘Good enough’ access: digital inclusion, social stratification, and the reinforcement of class in the Philippines. Communication Research and Practice5(2): 156–171.
55.
Uy-TiocoCSCabalquintoECB (2020) Transnational mobile carework: Filipino migrants, family intimacy, and mobile media. In: CabañesJVAUy-TiocoCS (eds) Mobile Media and Social Intimacies in Asia, Mobile Communication in Asia: Local Insights, Global Implications. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 153–170.
