This article discusses the findings of a national survey of the social organisation of television viewing practices in contemporary Australia. These questions are addressed through multiple correspondence analyses of the aspects of television practices and tastes covered in the survey. These go beyond channel and genre preferences to include a sample of Australian and overseas produced television programmes and of 10 Australian TV personalities. The differential distribution of tastes across Australian and overseas programmes also throws significant light on different investments in the national culture across different social groups. The survey data also includes evidence regarding viewing platform and device preferences. In concluding, the article reviews the evidence of a cluster analysis, registering the effects of major changes within the television field in Australia, including the decline of free-to-air and ‘linear’ viewing, the rise of streaming services and the erosion of brand loyalty as it relates to television channels.
AngIHawkinsGDabboussyL (2008) The SBS Story: The Challenge of Cultural Diversity. Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.
2.
BainbridgeJ (2009) Going down the hole: Beaconsfield, celebrities and the changing news culture in Australia. Cultural Studies Review15(1): 43–64.
3.
BennettJ (2011a) Architectures of participation: fame, television and web 2.0. In: BennettJStrangeN (eds) Television as Digital Media. Durham, NC; London: Duke University Press, pp. 332–357.
4.
BennettJ (2011b) Television Personalities: Stardom and the Small Screen. London; New York: Routledge.
5.
BennettT (1998) Culture: A Reformer’s Science. London: Sage.
6.
BennettTGayoM (2018) For the love (or not) of art. In: QuinMBeechDLehnertMet al. (eds) The Persistence of Taste: Art, Museums and Everyday Life after Bourdieu. London; New York: Routledge.
7.
BennettTEmmisonMFrowJ (1999) Accounting for Tastes; Australian Everyday Cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BensonRNeveuE (eds) (2005) Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television and Journalism. London: Pluto Press.
10.
CouldryN (2003) Media meta-capital: extending the range of Bourdiu’s field theory. Theory and Society32 (5-6): 653–677.
11.
De Saint MartinM (2015) From ‘Anatomie du goût’ to La Distinction: attempting to construct the social space. Some markers for the history of the research. In: CoulangeonPDuvalJ (eds) The Routledge Companion to Bourdieu’s ‘Distinction’. London: Routledge, pp. 15–28.
12.
DonnatO (2016) The rising power of screens. Changing cultural practices in France, from 1973 to 2008. In: HanquinetLSavageM (eds) Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 396–408.
13.
DriessensO (2013) Celebrity capital: redefining celebrity using field theory. Theory and Society42: 543–560.
14.
FeuerJKerrPVahimagiT (1984) MTM: ‘Quality Television’. London: British Film Institute.
15.
GripsrudJHovdenJFMoeH (2011) Changing relations: class education and cultural capital. Poetics: Journal of Empirical Research on Culture, the Media and the Arts39(6): 507–529.
16.
HallinanBStriphasT (2016) Recommended for you: the Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society18(1): 117–137.
HutchinsBRoweD (2012) Sport beyond Television: The Internet, Digital Media and the Rise of Networked Media Sport. New York; Abingdon: Routledge.
19.
JacobsJ (2001) Issues of judgement and value in television studies. International Journal of Cultural Studies4(4): 428–447.
20.
KanaiA (2015) Jennifer Lawrence, remixed: approaching celebrity through DIY digital culture. Celebrity Studies6(3): 322–340.
21.
LivingstoneSLocalC (2017) Measurement matters: difficulties in defining and measuring children’s television viewing in a changing media landscape. Media International Australia163(1): 67–76.
22.
LoganE (2016) ‘Quality television’ as a critical obstacle: explanation and aesthetics in television studies’. Screen57(2): 144–162.
23.
LoweGFMartinF (eds) (2014) The Value of Public Service Media. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
24.
LuryK (2016) Introduction: situating television studies. Screen57(2): 119–123.
25.
MackenzieAMillsRSharplesSet al. (2016) Digital sociology in the field of devices. In: HanquinetLSavageM (eds) Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 367–382.
26.
MarshallPDRedmondS (2015) A Companion to Celebrity. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
27.
MendickKAllenKHarveyL (2015) Turning to the empirical audience: the desired but denied object of celebrity studies?Celebrity Studies6(3): 374–377.
28.
MittellJ (2015) Complex TV: The Poetics of Contemporary Television Storytelling. New York: New York University Press.
29.
PiperH (2016) Broadcast drama and the problem of television aesthetics: home, nation, universe. Screen57(2): 163–183.
30.
RooseH (2016) Getting beyond the surface: using geometric data analysis in cultural sociology. In: HanquinetLSavageM (eds) Routledge International Handbook of the Sociology of Art and Culture. London; New York: Routledge, pp. 174–189.
31.
RuppertELawJSavageM (2013) Reassembling social science methods: the challenge of digital devices. Theory, Culture and Society30(4): 22–46.
32.
SilvaE (2017) Objects and materials: with, against and beyond Bourdieu. In: AdkinsLBrosnanCThreadgoldS (eds) Bourdieusian Prospects. London: Routledge, pp. 112–131.
