Automation has been central to the development of modern photography and, in the age of digital and smartphone photography, now largely defines everyday experience of the photographic process. In this article, we question the acceptance of automation as the default position for photography, arguing that discussions of automation need to move beyond binary concerns of whether to automate or not and, instead, to consider what is being automated and the degree of automation couched within the particularities of people’s practices. We base this upon findings from ethnographic fieldwork with people engaging manually with film-based photography. While automation liberates people from having to interact with various processes of photography, participants in our study reported a greater sense of control, richer experiences and opportunities for experimentation when they were able to engage manually with photographic processes.
AbidinC (2016) ‘Aren’t these just young, rich women doing vain things online?’ Influencer selfies as subversive frivolity. Social Media + Society2(2): 1–17.
2.
AndrewsG (2008) The Slow Food Story: Politics and Pleasure. London: Pluto Press.
3.
BirksMChapmanYFrancisK (2008) Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing13(1): 68–75.
4.
BourdieuP (2010) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Taylor & Francis.
5.
BurgessJE (2009) Remediating vernacular creativity: photography and cultural citizenship in the Flickr photosharing network. In: EdensorTLeslieDMillingtonSet al. (eds) Spaces of Vernacular Creativity: Rethinking the Cultural Economy. London: Routledge, pp. 116–126.
6.
CaoduroE (2014) Photo filter apps: understanding analogue nostalgia in the new media ecology. Networking Knowledge: Journal of the Meccsa Postgraduate Network7(2): 67–82.
7.
Cartier-BressonH (2014) The Decisive Moment (Reprint). Göttingen: Steidl Verlag.
8.
ChalfenR (1987) Snapshot Versions of Life. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
GillespieT (2006) Designed to ‘effectively frustrate’: copyright, technology, and the agency of users. New Media & Society8(4): 651–669.
11.
Gómez CruzEMeyerET (2012) Creation and control in the photographic process: iPhones and the emerging fifth moment of photography. Photographies5(2): 203–221.
12.
GrinterRE (2005) Words about images: coordinating community in amateur photography. Computer Supported Cooperative Work14(2): 161–188.
13.
HallnäsLRedströmJ (2001) Slow technology: designing for reflection. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing5(3): 201–212.
14.
KirkDSellenARotherCet al. (2006) Understanding photowork. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing (CHI 2006) (eds GrinterRRoddenTAokiPet al), Montreal, QC, Canada, 22–27 April, pp. 761–770. New York: ACM.
15.
LjungbladS (2007) Designing for new photographic experiences: how the lomographic practice informed context photography. In: Proceedings of the conference on designing pleasurable products and interfaces (DPPI 2007) (eds KoskinenIKeinonenT), Helsinki, 22–25 August, pp. 357–374. New York: ACM.
16.
ManovichL (1996) The automation of sight: from photography to computer vision. In: DruckreyT (ed.) Electronic Culture: Technology and Visual Representation. New York: Aperture, pp. 229–239.
MarienMW (2011) Photography: A Cultural History. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
19.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20.
PickeringMKeightleyE (2006) The modalities of nostalgia. Current Sociology54(6): 919–941.
21.
PlodererBLeongTAshkanasyS.et al (2012) A process of engagement: engaging with the process. In: Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference (eds OlivierPWrightPBlevisBet al), Newcastle Upon Tyne, 11–15 June, pp. 224–233. New York: ACM.
22.
PyeD (1968) The Nature and Art of Workmanship. London: Cambridge University Press.
23.
SchwartzD (1986) Camera clubs and fine art photography: the social construction of an elite code. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography15(2): 165–195.
24.
SennettR (2008) The Craftsman. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25.
SontagS (1990) On Photography. New York: Anchor Books.
26.
StebbinsRA (1992) Amateurs, Professionals, and Serious Leisure. Montreal, QC, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
27.
TreadawayCP (2009) Hand e-craft: an investigation into hand use in digital creative practice. In: Proceeding of the 7th conference on creativity and cognition (C&C 2009) (eds Bryan-KinnsNGrossMJohnsonHet al), Berkeley, CA, 26–30 October, pp. 185–194. New York: ACM.
28.
VivienneSBurgessJ (2013) The remediation of the personal photograph and the politics of self-representation in digital storytelling. Journal of Material Culture18(3): 279–298.
