Despite the rapid evolution in the way in which we watch television – through digitalisation and the introduction of video on demand (VOD) and catch-up services – the inaccessibility of television content remains an issue, specifically for people who are Deaf or hard of hearing. This article revisits the claim from 2014 that VOD providers were ‘working on’ providing closed captions. Building on Ellis’ 2014 research, the accessibility of television in Australia in 2016 is analysed using a cross study of current subscription VOD services and catch-up television providers. The research reveals that while some companies have accessibility policies and offer closed captioned content, there have been minimal changes in the provision of captioning, both within the industry and in legislation.
AlbrechtG (1992) The Disability Business: Rehabilitation in America. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
AlbrechtGBuryM (2001) The political economy of the disability marketplace. In: AlbrechtGSeelmanKBuryM (eds) Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 585–609.
DowneyG (2008) Closed Captioning: Subtitling, Stenography, and the Digital Convergence of Text with Television. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
21.
EllcessorE (2011) Captions on, off on TV, online: accessibility and search engine optimization in online closed captioning. Television & New Media13(4): 329–352.
EllcessorE (2016) Restricted Access: Media, Disability, and the Politics of Participation. New York: New York University Press.
24.
EllisK (2014) Television’s transition to the internet: disability accessibility and broadband-based TV in Australia. Media International Australia153: 53–63.
25.
EllisK (2015) Netflix closed captions offer an accessible model for the streaming video industry, but what about audio description?Communication, Politics & Culture47(3): 3–20.
26.
EllisKKentM (2015) Accessible television: the new frontier in disability media studies brings together industry innovation, government legislation and online activism. First Monday9(20). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i9.6170
FernandesNCostaDDuarteCet al (2013) Evaluating the accessibility of adaptive TV based web applications. In: BiswasPDuarteCLangdonPet al. (eds) A Multimodal End-2-End Approach to Accessible Computing. London: Springer, pp. 177–194.
31.
GoldingPMurdockG (1989) Information poverty and political inequality: citizenship in the age of privatized communications. Journal of Communication39(3): 180–195.
MurdockG (1999) Rights and representations: public discourse and cultural citizenship. In: GripsrudJ (ed.) Television and Common Knowledge. New York: Routledge, pp. 7–17.
43.
MurdockG (2011) Political economies as moral economies: commodities, gifts, and public goods. In: WaskoJMurdockGSousaH (eds) The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 11–40.
44.
OliverM (1984) The politics of disability. Critical Social Policy4(11): 21–32.
45.
OliverM (1990) The Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
UtrayFde CastroMMorenoLet al. (2012) Monitoring accessibility services in digital television. International Journal of Digital Multimedia Broadcasting2012: 294219. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/294219
VPAAC (2011) Closed captioning of video programming delivered using Internet protocol. First report of the Video Programming Accessibility Advisory Committee on the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act of 2010. FCC, 13July. Available at: https://transition.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/VPAAC/First_VPAAC_Report_to_the_FCC_7-11-11_FINAL.pdf (accessed 18 March 2017).
