The extant scholarship of media ownership, largely drawn from Anglo-Saxon studies, focuses on how corporate excesses translate to abuses of the public interest goal of journalism, paying less attention to ‘political instrumentalism’. This research aims to study how the complex interplay of business and political instrumentalism influences editorial policies in diversely owned, regional and national news media through a case study of commercially run newspapers’ coverage of anti-industrialization protests in the East Indian city of Kolkata. Through political–economic critiques and thematic analysis of newspaper articles and qualitative interviews, this research asserts the importance of the role of the ‘proprietor-editor’ and the binaries of regional/ national newspaper markets in the interplay of business and political instrumentalism in diversely owned news media.
Annual Reports (2006, 2007, 2012 & 2013). Audit Bureau of Circulations, India.
2.
BalH. (2021). The New Khalistan Conspiracy. Published in the website of The Caravan. https://caravanmagazine.in/politics/republic-day-khalistan-conspiracy-government-playing-dangerous-game-punjab-disaster
3.
BanerjeeS. (2011). Rabindranath - A liberal humanist fallen among Bigoted Bhadraloks. Economic and Political Weekly, 6(24), 51–59.
4.
BarnhurstK.G. & NeroneJ. (2009). Journalism history. In Wahl-JorgensenK. & HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook Of journalism studies (pp. 17–28). Routledge.
5.
Basu openly expresses displeasure on Singur incident. (2006, May27). Anandabazar Patrika, p. 1.
6.
BasuP. P. (2007). “Brand Buddha” in India’s West Bengal: The Left Reinvents Itself. Asian Survey, 47(2), 288–306.
7.
BensonR. (2016). Institutional forms of media ownership and their modes of power. In EideM., SjovaagH., & LarsenL. O. (Eds.), Journalism reexamined digital challenges and professional reorientations lessons from Northern Europe (pp. 29–47). Intellect.
8.
BhushanB. (2015). The changing structure of media and ethics in India. In RaoS. & WassermanH. (Eds.), Media ethics and justice in the age of globalization (pp. 194–209). Palgrave Macmillan.
9.
BraunV., & ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
10.
ChakrabortyA., & BanerjeeF. (2006, November14). Land sold, but what about future?The Times of India, p. 2.
11.
ChakravarttyP., & RoyS. (2013). Media pluralism Redux: Towards new frameworks of comparative media studies “Beyond the west”. Political Communication, 30, 349–370.
12.
ChakravarttyP., & RoyS. (2015). Mr. Modi goes to Delhi: Mediated populism and the 2014 Indian Elections. Political Communication, 30, 349–370.
13.
ColeridgeN. (1993). Paper tigers: The latest, greatest newspaper tycoons and how they won the world. Random House Books.
14.
CroteauD., & HoynesW. (2001). Corporate media and the public interest. Pine Forge Press.
15.
DasguptaK. (1984). Shwadhinota Uttor Gono Andolon. In ChakrabartyR. (Ed.), Gono Andolon O Sangbadpatra (pp. 119–128). Mandas.
16.
Farmers won’t give land in Singur at any cost. (2006, May29). Bartaman, p. 6.
17.
FICCI-KPMG. (2019). India’s digital future: Mass of niches. Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report 2019. FICCI-KPMG.
18.
GeorgeC., ZengY., & MazumdarS. (2019). Navigating conflicts of interest: Ethical policies of 12 exemplary Asian media organisations. Journalism, 22(6), 1279–1295.
19.
GhosalJ. (2006, September26). Decision to pay more than 52 per cent of market price for compensation. Anandabazar Patrika, p. 1.
20.
GundimedaS. (2015). Caste, media and political power in Andhra Pradesh: The case of Eenadu. History and Sociology of South Asia, 11(2), 192–203.
21.
HossainM. (2006, May31). Who gave the leaders the absolute right to displace farmers from their land. Bartaman, p. 6.
22.
Industry, not land reforms, is revolution for Left. (2006, July10). The Times of India. p. 3.
23.
JeffreyR. (2000). India’s newspaper revolution capitalism politics and the Indian-language press 1977–1999. Hurst & Company.
24.
JeffreyR. (2010). Mission, money and machinery: Indian Newspapers in the Twentieth Century. (Working Paper, 117). ISAS.
25.
Kohli-KhandekarV. (2010). The Indian Media Business (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
26.
McChesneyR. W. (2008). The political economy of media enduring issues, emerging dilemmas. Monthly Review Press.
27.
McManusJ. M. (2009). The commercialization of news. In Wahl-JorgensenK. & HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 218–236). Routledge.
28.
MenonN., & NigamA. (2007). Power and contestation India since 1989. Fernwood Publishing; Zed Books.
29.
MukherjeeR. (2012). A centenary tribute - Asoke Kumar Sarkar (1912–1983). Published in the website of The Telegraph. https://www.telegraphindia.com/opinion/a-centenary-tribute-asoke-kumar-sarkar-1912-1983/cid/375119
30.
MurdockG., & GoldingP. (2005). Culture, communications and political economy. In CurranJ. & Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 60–84). Arnold.
31.
NeyaziT. (2018). Political communication and mobilisation: The Hindi media in India. Cambridge University Press.
32.
NielsenK. B. (2009). Four narratives of a social movement in West Bengal. Journal of South Asian Studies, 32(3), 448–468.
33.
NinanS. (2013). The Hindu returns to the family fold. The Hoot. http://asu.thehoot.org/media-watch/media-business/the-hindu-returns-to-the-family-fold-7102
34.
Party workers quitting the CPIM for their land being taken away forcibly. (2006, September, 30). Bartaman, p. 1.
35.
PaulA. (2012). Bengali newspapers: a price war brewing. Live Mint. http://www.livemint.com/Companies/VROLybhy8qfaE5JVSClrRM/Bengali-newspapers-a-price-war-brewing.html
36.
Promise of more employment for the poor. (2006, May29). Ganashakti, p. 1 and p. 7.
SahaA. (2007, January9). Not just Singur-Nandigram. It’s a fight for the entire state. Ganashakti, p. 6.
40.
SahaS. (2006, December4). Women farmers start fasting in Singur. Dainik Statesman, p. 1.
41.
SahaS. (2006a, December3). Police terror in villages, sticks and teargas. Dainik Statesman, p. 1.
42.
Singur farmers will not be allowed to construct houses if they oppose. (2006, September, 16). Anandabazar Patrika, p. 1 and p. 5.
43.
StirlingA.J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
44.
Strike faces stumbling block at the heart of Singur, 60 farmers sell land. (2006, October10). Anandabazar Patrika, p. 1 and p. 7.
45.
ThakurtaP. G. (2012). Media ethics truth, fairness, and objectivity (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
46.
The administration progresses with work in Singur by managing dissent. (2006, December3). Anandabazar Patrika, p. 1 and p. 5.
47.
The Times of India. (2006, July10). Industry, not land reforms, is revolution for Left, p. 3.
48.
UdupaS. (2015). Making news in Global India: Media, publics, politics. Cambridge University Press.
49.
WaisbordS. (2009). Advocacy journalism in a global context. In Wahl-JorgensenK. & HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 371–385). Routledge.
