The YouTube video platform has provided fertile ground for creators outside the journalistic field to produce programs that combine elements of entertainment with information on public affairs. Behind the emergence of these practices lie important trends enabling alternative public discourses and altering the cultural production, but also an environment mainly characterized by the low trust in mainstream news organizations and high ideological polarization that seem to give shape to political entertainment contents—and especially their overt political partisanship. Based on observations of independent political entertainment YouTube channels in Mexico, this study delves into their apparently contradictory intersections with professional journalism and the constraints imposed on their practice by platform affordances.
AbidinCrystal. 2018. Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
2.
ArriagadaArturoIbáñezFrancisco. 2020. “You Need at Least One Picture Daily, If Not, You’re Dead’: Content Creators and Platform Evolution in the Social Media Ecology.” Social Media + Society6 (3): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2056305120944624.
3.
BaumgartnerJody CMorrisJonathan S.2008. “Jon Stewart Comes to Class: The Learning Effects of America (The Book) in Introduction to American Government Courses.” Journal of Political Science Education4 (2): 169–86.
4.
BeckerAmy Bree. 2021. “Imitation is the Sincerest Form of Flattery. Or is It? The Effects of Exposure to SNL Parody on Perceptions of the View.” Journalism Studies22: 992–1009.
5.
Belair-GagnonValerieHoltonE. AveryWestlundO. Oscar. 2019. “Space for the Liminal.” Media and Communication7 (4): 1–7.
6.
BishopSophie. 2018. “Anxiety, Panic and Self-Optimization: Inequalities and the YouTube Algorithm.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies24 (1): 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354856517736978.
7.
CarlsonMattPeiferJason T.2013. “The Impudence of Being Earnest: Jon Stewart and the Boundaries of Discursive Responsibility.” Journal of Communication63 (2): 333–50.
8.
CrittendenVictoria L.HopkinsLucas M.SimmonsJ. M.2011. “Satirists as Opinion Leaders: Is Social Media Redefining Roles?” Journal of Public Affairs11 (3): 174–80.
EcheverríaMartínRodeloFrida V.2021. “The Liberalization Process of Satire in Postauthoritarian Democracies: Potentials and Limits in Mexico’s Network Television.” International Journal of Communication15: 2177–95. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16024/3437.
11.
EldridgeScott A.2019. “Thank God for Deadspin”: Interlopers, Metajournalistic Commentary, and Fake News Through the Lens of Journalistic Realization.” New Media & Society21 (4): 856–78. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444818809461.
12.
GollmitzerMirjam. 2014. “Precariously employed watchdogs? Perceptions of working conditions among freelancers and interns.” Journalism Practice8 (6): 826–41.
13.
GuerreroManuel. 2014. “The ‘Captured Liberal’ Model of Media Systems in Latin America.” In Media Systems and Communication Policies in Latin America, edited by GuerreroManuelMárquez-RamírezMireya, 43–65. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14.
HouMingyi. 2019. “Social Media Celebrity and the Institutionalization of YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies25 (3): 534–53. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354856517750368.
15.
Instituto Federal de Telecomunicaciones. 2021. “Encuesta Nacional de Consumo de Contenidos Audiovisuales 2019.” http://www.ift.org.mx.
16.
LaaksonenSalla-MaariaPanttiMerviTitleyGavan. 2020. “Broadcasting the Movement and Branding Political Microcelebrities: Finnish Anti-Immigration Video Practices on Youtube.” Journal of Communication70 (2): 171–94.
LewisRebecca. 2020. “This is What the News Won’t Show You”: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-Celebrity.” Television & New Media21 (2): 201–17. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1527476419879919.
19.
MaddoxJessicaCreechBrian. 2021. “Interrogating LeftTube: ContraPoints and the Possibilities of Critical Media Praxis on Youtube.” Television & New Media22 (6): 595–615. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1527476420953549.
20.
MarwickAliceboyddanah. 2011. “To See and be Seen: Celebrity Practice on Twitter.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies17 (2): 139–58. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1354856510394539.
21.
MarwickAlice E.2013. Status Update. New Haven: Yale University Press.
22.
MorenoAlejandro. 2018. El Cambio Electoral: Votantes, Encuestas y Democracia En México. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
23.
MorrealeJoanne. 2014. “From Homemade to Store Bought: Annoying Orange and the Professionalization of YouTube.” Journal of Consumer Culture14 (1): 113–28. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1469540513505608.
24.
NewmanNicFletcherRichardSchulzAnneSimgeAndiRobertsonCraig T.NielsenRasmus Kleis. 2020. Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Reuters Institute. http://www.digitalnewsreport.org.
25.
NieborgDavid B.PoellThomas. 2018. “The Platformization of Cultural Production: Theorizing the Contingent Cultural Commodity.” New Media & Society20 (11): 4275–92. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1461444818769694.
PeerLimorKsiazekThomas B.2011. “YouTube and the Challenge to Journalism: New Standards for News Videos Online.” Journalism Studies12 (1): 45–63.
28.
PeiferJason T.2018. “Imitation as Flattery: How TV News Parody’s Media Criticism Can Influence Perceived News Media Importance and Media Trust.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly95 (3): 734–56. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1077699017713002
ReeseStephen D.RutiglianoLouHyunKideukJeongJaekwan. 2007. “Mapping the Blogosphere: Professional and Citizen-Based Media in the Global News Arena.” Journalism8 (3): 235–61.
32.
ReichZvi. 2008. “How Citizens Create News Stories: The “News Access” Problem Reversed.” Journalism Studies9 (5): 739–58.
33.
RodeloFrida V.2020. “El pulso de la república y los programas mexicanos de sátira política y periodismo ciudadano en Youtube, ¿la respuesta mexicana a Jon Stewart?” In Televisión en tiempos de Netflix. Una nueva oferta mediática, edited by OrozcoGuillermo, 185–211. Guadalajara: Universidad de Guadalajara. http://www.publicaciones.cucsh.udg.mx/kiosko/2020/television_netflix.pdf.
StraussAnselm. 2003. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36.
VonderauPatrick. 2016. “The Video Bubble: Multichannel Networks and the Transformation of YouTube.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies22 (4): 361–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856516641882
37.
WaisbordSilvio. 2013. Vox Populista. Buenos Aires: Gedisa.
38.
WilliamsBruce A.Delli-CarpiniMichael X.2011. “Real Ethical Concerns and Fake News. The Daily Show and the Challenge of the New Media Environment.” In The Stewart/Colbert Effect: Essays on the Real Impacts of Fake News, edited by AmarasingamAmarnath, 181–192. Jefferson: McFarland.
