This study analyses the use of modals as stance markers in newspaper editorials. Corpora of the study comprised of 500 editorials published in Pakistani English newspapers, that is, The Daily Dawn and The Daily News (250 editorials from each newspaper) which were analysed with the help of AntConc 3.4.4.0. Results show Pakistani editorial writers use all types of modals (i.e., prediction, possibility, necessity, modal adverbs, reporting verbs, knowledge verbs and generic phrases). The editorial writers use these modals to mark personal stance while commenting, reporting or informing about the state of affairs. Among these modals the use of prediction markers is the most frequent which indicates that prediction is a characteristic feature as well as function in the said newspaper editorials. Results also reveal that there is a difference in the use of modal adverbs in the editorials of both newspapers. In addition, the results reveal that the editorial writers of The Daily Dawn make less use of prediction markers as compared to the editorial writers of The Daily News. The study creates awareness of the stance of editorial writers’ and how it might affect readers’ opinions.
Al-ShunnagM. A. (2014). Stance in political discourse: Arabic translations of American newspaper opinion articles on the ‘Arab Spring’ (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Salford.
2.
AndersonR., DardenneR. W., & KillenbergG. M. (1994). The conversation of journalism: Communication, community, and news. Praeger.
3.
BednarekM. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse: Analysis of a newspaper corpus. Continuum.
4.
BenvenisteE. (1971). Problems in general linguistics (MeekMary E., Trans.). University of Miami Press.
5.
BiberD. (2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. John Benjamins.
BiberD., & FineganE. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text-Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 9(1), 93–124.
8.
BiberD., JohanssonS., LeechG., ConradS., & FineganE. (1999). Grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.
9.
BistaK. (2009). On ‘yes, we can’: Linguistic power and possibility. Journal of English for Specific Purpose, 3(24), 34–50.
10.
BonyadiA. (2011). Linguistic manifestations of modality in newspaper editorials. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1–13.
11.
BreezeR. (2016). Negotiating alignment in newspaper editorials. Pragmatics, 26(1), 1–19.
12.
ChafeW. L., & NicholsJ. (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Ablex.
13.
ConradS. & BiberD. (2000). Adverbial marking of stance in speech and writing. In HunstonS. & ThompsonG. (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 56–73). Oxford University Press.
14.
Du BoisJ. (2007). The stance triangle. In EnglebretsonR. (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction (pp. 139–182). John Benjamins.
15.
Du BoisJ. W., & KärkkäinenE. (2012). Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text & Talk, 32(4), 433–451.
16.
DuryR. (2018). A brief glossary of modality. www.unibg.it/anglistica/slin/modgloss.htm
17.
EnglebretsonR. (2007). Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (Vol. 164). John Benjamins Publishing.
18.
FillmoreC. J. (2003). Double-decker definitions: The role of frames in meaning explanations. Sign Language Studies, 3(3), 263–295.
19.
FowlerR. (2013). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. Routledge.
20.
HallH. L. (2003). Junior high journalism. Taylor & Francis.
21.
HallidayM. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
22.
HayatN., & JulianaA. W. (2016). A comparative analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: The case of Taliban’s attack on Malala Yousafzai. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 24(3), 1087–1101.
23.
HeY., & WangH. (2012, July). A corpus-based study of epistemic modality markers in Chinese research articles. In Workshop on Chinese Lexical Semantics (pp. 199–208), Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
24.
HenryF. & TatorC. (2002). Discourse of domination: Racial bias in the Canadian English- Language Press. University of Toronto Press.
25.
HolmesJ. (1988). Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 9(1), 21–44.
26.
HunstonS. (1994). Evaluation and organization in a sample of written academic discourse. In CoulthardM. (Ed.), Advances in Written Text Analysis (pp. 191–218). Routledge.
27.
HunstonS. (2011). Corpus approaches to evaluation: Phraseology and evaluative language. Routledge.
28.
HunstonS., & ThompsonG. (2000). Evaluation in text: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse: Authorial stance and the construction of discourse. Oxford University Press.
29.
HylandK. (1994). Hedging in academic writing and EAP textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 13(3), 239–256.
30.
HylandK. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Longman
31.
HylandK. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192.
32.
HylandK.(1996). Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics, 17, 433–454.
33.
IwasakiS., & YapF. H. (2015). Stance-marking and stance-taking in Asian languages. Journal of Pragmatics, 83, 1–9.
34.
JaffeA. (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. USA: Oxford University Press.
35.
KärkkäinenE. (2006). Stance taking in conversation: From subjectivity to intersubjectivity. Text & Talk, 26(6), 699–731.
36.
KhalidP. Z. B. M. (2013). Modality analysis of the newspaper articles about the Scottish Ship RMS Queen Elizabeth. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(9), 458–461.
37.
LawalO. A. (2015). Pragmatics of truth and modality in newspaper editorials: An example of the punch and the tribune. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(4), 688–693.
38.
LeE. (2004). Active participation within written argumentation: Metadiscourse and editorialist’s authority. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 687–714.
39.
LyonsJ., & JohnL. (1995). Linguistic semantics: An introduction. Cambridge University Press.
40.
MartinJ. R. (2000). Beyond exchange: Appraisal systems in English. In HunstonS. & ThompsonG. (Eds.), Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse (pp. 142–175). Oxford University Press.
41.
MartinJ. R., & WhiteP. R. R. (2005). The language of evaluation: Appraisal in English. Palgrave Macmillan.
42.
McQuailD. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction. SAGE Publications.
43.
MirahayuniN. K. (2002). Investigating textual structure in native and non-native English research articles: Strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. University of New South Wales.
44.
MolinaS. (2012). Non-verbal markers of modality and evidentiality in MarENG. LFE. Revista de Lenguas para Fines Específicos18, 45–70.
45.
MoskowichI., & CrespoB. (2019). Arguments that could possibly be urged: Modal verbs and tentativeness in the Coruña corpus. Languages, 4(57), 1–12.
46.
NarteyM., & YanksonF. E. (2014). A semantic investigation into the use of modal auxiliary verbs in the manifesto of a Ghanaian political party. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(3), 21–304.
47.
NgulaR. S. (2017). Epistemic modal verbs in research articles written by Ghanaian and international scholars: A corpus-based study of three disciplines. Brno Studies in English, 43(2), 5–27.
48.
NtsaneM. F. S. (2015). The management of writer-reader interaction in newspaper editorials. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 4(2), 108–123.
49.
OrtaI. V. (2010). A contrastive analysis of the use of modal verbs in the expression of epistemic stance in business management research articles in English and Spanish. Ibérica: Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para fines específicos (AELFE), (19), 77–96.
50.
PalmerF. R. (2001). Mood and modality. Cambridge University Press.
51.
QunZ. (2010). Modality and generic features in Chinese EFL writings. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics (Foreign Language Teaching & Research Press), 33(5), 40–51.
52.
RicketsonM., & GrahamC. (2018). The state of feature writing today. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 28(2), 205–217.
53.
SadiaS., & GhaniM. (2019). Modality in editorials of Pakistani English newspapers: A corpus based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 144–151.
54.
SiddiqueA. R. (2017). Metadiscourse analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus based study (Unpublished Master Thesis). Department of Applied Linguistics, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
55.
SiddiqueA. R., MahmoodM. A., & IqbalJ. (2018). Metadiscourse analysis of Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus-based study. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(1), 146–163.
56.
SiddiqueA. R., MahmoodM. A., AkhterN., & ArslanF. (2018). Hedges as metadiscourse in Pakistani English newspaper editorials: A corpus based study. International Journal of Development Research, 8(5), 20478–20486.
57.
SiddiqueA. R., ShahS. K., & AhmadM. (2019). Modality in an autobiography ‘If I am assassinated’ by Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto in English and its Urdu translation. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 6, 1–36.
58.
SimpsonP. (1993). Language, ideology and point of view. Routledge.
Tawab (2000). Editorial coverage of women right (Unpublished Master Thesis). Punjab University, Lahore, Pakistan.
61.
TenutaA. M., OliveiraA. L. A., & OrfanóB. M. (2015). How Brazilian learners express modality through verbs and adverbs in their writing: A corpus-based study on n-grams. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Ling✓ística Teórica e Aplicada, 31(2), 333–357.
62.
TimucinM. (2010). Different language styles in newspapers: An investigative framework. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 6(2), 104–126.
63.
TrajkovaP. Z. (2011). Toning down statements in newspaper editorials. The Journal for Languages and Literatures of the Faculty of Philosophy in Novi Sad, 1, 71–84.
64.
TraugottE. C. (2012). Intersubjectification and clause periphery. English Text Construction, 5(1), 7–28.
65.
Van DijkT. A. (1992). Racism and argumentation: Race riot rhetoric in tabloid editorials. In van EemerenF. H., GrootendorstR., BlairJ. A., & WillardC. A. (Eds.), Argumentation Illuminated (pp. 243–59). SICSAT.
66.
Van DijkT. A. (1998). Opinions and ideologies in the press. In BellA. & GarrettP. (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse (pp. 21–63). Blackwell.
67.
Von FintelK. (2006). Modality and language. In BorchertDonald M.. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy – Second Edition. MacMillan Reference USA. http://mit.edu/fintel/www/modality.pdf
68.
WhiteP. R. (2001). Appraisal: An overview. http://www.grammatics.com/appraisal/AppraisalGuide/Framed/Appraisal-Overview.htm.
