In Malaysia, Chinese vernacular education has been a highly contested and much debated political issue in the mass media. This study examines how Malaysian newspapers framed Chinese primary education for a 3-year period (2015–2017) which is before the 2018 election. Findings showed that, the proximity of election has led to a surge in news reporting about Chinese primary education. Political considerations remain central in mainstream newspapers’ reporting in which official sources are dominant in shaping public understanding of the issue. Alternative newspapers serve as a counter-establishment platform through active participation of readers in public debate. A responsibility frame dominates the news coverage of Chinese primary education in both types of newspapers. Nevertheless, the alternative newspapers tend to focus on the conflict aspect of the issue by foregrounding discord between ruling and opposition politicians as well as intra-Barisan Nasional (BN) disputes. Through human interest frame, the mainstream newspapers emotionalize the issue to obtain readers’ attention. This study concludes that varying reporting strategies adopted by Malaysian newspapers can impact readers’ evaluation of education policy issues. The implications of the findings and the limitations of the study are also discussed.
AzizuddinM. S. (2014). Malaysia’s 13th general election: Political partisanship in the mainstream print media. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 61–75.
2.
Audit Bureau of Circulations Malaysia (2018). Circulation figures (July to December 2017), newspapers - West and East Malaysia states distribution. http://abcm.org.my/report/latest-audit-reports-july-to-december-2017/
3.
BartholoméG., LechelerS. & VreeseC. de (2015). Manufacturing conflict? How journalists intervene in the conflict frame building process. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 20(4), 438–457.
4.
BerkowitzD. A. (2009). Reporters and their sources. In Wahl-JorgensenK. & HanitzschT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 102–115). Routledge.
5.
BrownG. (2005). The rough and rosy road: Sites of contestation in Malaysia’s shackled media industry. Pacific Affairs, 78(1), 39–56.
6.
CarterM. J. (2013). The hermeneutics of frames and framing: An examination of the media’s construction of reality. SAGE Open, 3(2), 1–12.
7.
ChangP. K., MusaA. H. & FauziahA. (2012). Framing the contemporary education issue: Analysis of news stories from selected Malaysian daily newspapers. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities, 20(2), 455–474.
8.
Chernov HwangJ. & SadiqK. (2010). Legislating separation and solidarity in plural societies: The Chinese in Indonesia and Malaysia. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 16(2), 192–215.
9.
ChoongP. Y. (2014). Grassroots democratic movements’ dependency on new media in contemporary Malaysia: Prospects and limitations. In ChongA. & YahyaFaizal (Eds.), State, society and information technology in Asia: Alterity between online and offline politics (pp. 93–109). Routledge.
10.
CollinsA. (2006). Chinese educationalists in Malaysia: Defenders of Chinese identity. Asian Survey, 46(2), 298–318.
11.
CrouchH. (2001). Managing ethnic tensions through affirmative action: The Malaysian experience. In CollettaN. J., LimT. G. & Kelles-ViitanenA. (Eds.), Social cohesion and conflict prevention in Asia: Managing diversity through development (pp. 225–262). The World Bank.
12.
DahlgrenP. (2005). The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147–162.
13.
Department of Statistics Malaysia (2018). Current population estimates, Malaysia, 2017–2018. https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php
14.
DuanR. & TakahashiB. (2017). The two-way flow of news: A comparative study of American and Chinese newspaper coverage of Beijing’s air pollution. The International Communication Gazette, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048516656303
15.
EmbongA. R. (2002). Malaysia as a multicultural society. Macalester International, 12, 37–58.
16.
EntmanR. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
17.
GamsonW. A. & ModiglianiA. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.
18.
GansH. J. (1979). Deciding what’s news: A study of CBS evening news, NBC nightly news, Newsweek, Time. Random House.
19.
GaoX. A. & ShaoQ. (2018). Language policy and mass media. In TollefsonJ. W. & Pérez-MilansM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language policy and planning (pp. 299–317). Oxford University Press.
20.
GeorgeC. (2006). Contentious journalism and the Internet: Towards democratic discourse in Malaysia and Singapore. Singapore University Press.
21.
GeorgeC. (2018). Independent political journalism through new media and old values. Media Asia, 45(1–2), 38–40.
22.
GhanemS. (1997). Filling in the tapestry: The second level of agenda setting. In McCombsM., ShawD. L. & WeaverD. (Eds.), Communication and democracy (pp. 3–14). Lawrence Erlbaum.
23.
GillS. K. (2014). Language policy challenges in multi-ethnic Malaysia. Springer.
24.
GitlinT. (2003). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making and unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press.
25.
HalimahtonS., NguT. H. & RamanV. (2006). Covering race and religion: The Moorthy and Nyonya Tahir cases in four Malaysian newspapers. Journal of Malaysian Studies, XXIV(1&2), 185–201.
26.
HaqueM. S. (2003). The role of the state in managing ethnic tensions in Malaysia: A critical discourse. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(3), 240–266.
27.
HazriJ. & SanthiramR. R. (2012). Malaysian educational policy for national integration: Contested terrain of multiple aspirations in a multicultural nation. Journal of Language and Culture, 3(1), 20–31.
28.
HolstF. (2012). Ethnicization and identity construction in Malaysia. Routledge.
29.
HolstiO. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Addison-Wesley.
30.
JosephC. (2018). Malaysian geopolitics, ethnoscapes and education policy. In JosephC. (Ed.), Policies and politics in Malaysian education: Education reforms, nationalism and neoliberalism (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
31.
KimH. & KimS.-H. (2018). Framing marijuana: How U.S. newspapers frame marijuana legalization stories (1995–2014). Preventive Medicine Reports, 11, 196–201.
32.
LeeT. H. (2011). Chinese schools in Peninsular Malaysia: The struggle for survival. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
33.
LentJ. A. (1978). Malaysia’s national language mass media: History and present status. South East Asian Studies, 15(4), 598–612.
34.
LumsdenL. J. (2013). How independent? An analysis of GE13 coverage by Malaysia’s online news portal coverage. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 29(2), 1–30.
35.
Malaysian Digital Association (2018). MDA releases rankings of top web entities in Malaysia for July 2018. [Press release]. http://www.malaysiandigitalassociation.org.my/report/july-2018-mda-releases-rankings-of-top-web-entities-in-malaysia/
36.
MatthesJ. (2012). Framing politics: An integrative approach. American Behavioral Scientist, 56(3), 247–259.
37.
MatthewsJ. (2013). Journalists and their sources: The twin challenges of diversity and verification. In Fowler-WattK. & AllanS. (Eds.), Journalism: New challenges (pp. 242–258). Centre for Journalism & Communication Research, Bournemouth University.
38.
MustafaK. A. (2010). Packaging the PM: The art and ideology of political advertising. In YeohS. G. (Ed.), Media, culture and society in Malaysia (pp. 46–63). Routledge.
39.
MustafaK. A. (2014). Election advertising in the mainstream print media: Politics for sale during Malaysia’s 2013 General Election. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 24(1), 77–94.
40.
NgM. L. & LeeY. B. (2018). Malaysian Chinese language newspapers and national identity: A study of the roles of Sin Chew Daily in Chinese cultural preservation and nation building. Journal of Malaysian Studies, 36(1), 63–103.
41.
Nielsen (2018). State of the media-the Malaysian media landscape in 2017. https://www.nielsen.com/my/en/insights/reports/2018/state-of-the-media-malaysian-media-landscape-2017.html
42.
PowersM. (2018). NGOs as newsmakers: The changing landscape of international news. Columbia University Press.
43.
QuandtT. & SingerJ. B. (2009). Convergence and cross-platform content production. In Wahl-JorgensenK. & HanitszchT. (Eds.), The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 130–144). Routledge.
44.
SamuelM., KhanM. H., NgL. L. & CheangK. W. (2012). Articulation of medium of instruction politics in the Malaysian Chinese press. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(2), 205–218.
45.
SanthiramR. R. & TanY. S. (2015). The development of Chinese education in Malaysia: Problems and challenges. ISEAS Working Papers (No. 2). https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/WP2015-02.pdf
46.
SemetkoH. A. & ValkenburgP. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
47.
ShaoB. & Nik NormaN. H. (2014). Journalistic roles among Chinese-language press journalists in China and Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155, 277–282.
48.
SteeleJ. (2009). How Malaysiakini challenges authoritarianism. International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(11), 91–111.
49.
TanY. S. & SezaliM. D. (2015). The emergence and widening of ethnic divide in the Malaysian educational system. Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
50.
TapsellR. (2013). The media freedom movement in Malaysia and the electoral authoritarian regime. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 43(4), 613–635.
51.
TollefsonJ. W. & TsuiB. M. A. (2004). Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda?. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
52.
TollefsonJ. W. (2015). Language policy-making in multilingual education: Mass media and the framing of medium of instruction. Current Issues in Language Planning, 16(1–2), 132–148.
53.
VreeseC. H. de (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62.
54.
WangL. K. (2001). Media and democracy in Malaysia. The Public, 8(2), 67–88.
55.
WeissM. L. (2012). Politics in cyberspace: New media in Malaysia. Friedrih-Ebert-Stiftung. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/iez/09068.pdf
56.
WelshB. (2015). Elections in Malaysia: Voting behavior and electoral integrity. In WeissM. L. (Ed.), Routledge handbook of contemporary Malaysia (pp. 11–21). Routledge.
57.
YangL. F. & Md. SidinA. I. (2012). Framing controversy over language policy in Malaysia: The coverage of PPSMI reversal (teaching of mathematics and science in English) by Malaysian newspapers. Asian Journal of Communication, 22(5), 449–473.
58.
YangL. F. & Md. SidinA. I. (2015). Gatekeeping in the coverage of interethnic conflicts: An analysis of mainstream and alternative newspapers in Malaysia. SEARCH, 7(1), 23–51.
59.
ZairilK. J. & ChanN. (2018). The need for decentralization: A historical analysis of Malaysia’s education system. In JosephC. (Ed.), Policies and politics in Malaysian education: Education reforms, nationalism and neoliberalism (pp. 198–214). Routledge.
